Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquets: Clinically Important Increases in Pressure in Aortic Zone 1 and Zone 3 in a Cadaveric Study Directly Relevant to Combat Medics Treating Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage.

Thomas Smith, Ian Pallister, Paul J Parker
{"title":"Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquets: Clinically Important Increases in Pressure in Aortic Zone 1 and Zone 3 in a Cadaveric Study Directly Relevant to Combat Medics Treating Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage.","authors":"Thomas Smith, Ian Pallister, Paul J Parker","doi":"10.55460/KWGY-MP81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"Non-compressible\" torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is the leading cause of preventable battlefield death, requiring rapid surgical or radiological intervention, which is essentially precluded close to the point of injury. UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) analysis 2002-2012 showed 85.5% NCTH mortality. JTTR vascular injury data 2003-2008 revealed 100% mortality in named truncal vessel injuries. Gas insufflation and hyper-pressure intraperitoneal fluid animal studies have demonstrated significant reductions in blood loss in splanchnic injuries. We hypothesized that the noninvasive Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquet - Stabilized ( AAJT-S) would be a forward combat medic-delivered intervention to tamponade bleeding from vessels of the celiac trunk in descending aorta zone 1 by generating clinically significant proximal epigastric compartment pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four cadaveric donors each had two manometric water-filled balloons placed intra-peritoneally (1 epigastric, 1 retropubic), con- nected to manometer tubing. Baseline pressures of 8cmH2O were set (equating mean intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). AAJT-S was applied and inflated to 250mmHg. Pressures were contemporaneously recorded. AAJT-S was removed, along with the epigastric manometer. We added 500mL of water to simulate blood through the epigastric aperture. The manometer was replaced and reset to 8cmH2O. AAJT-S was reapplied to 250mmHg, and IAP steady pressures were again recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Proximal compartment pressures reached a mean of 54.6cmH2O (40.2mmHg); distal compartment pressures achieved a mean of 46cmH2O (34mmHg.) With 500mL intra peritoneal fluid, proximal compartment achieved a mean of 52.25cmH2O (38.4mmHg); distal compartment achieved a mean of 35cmH2O (25.7mmHg.) BMI had a statistically significant inverse effect on epigastric pressure, in this study range (BMIs, 16.7-22.9kg/m2). This proved clinically insignificant, with sufficient pressure still achieved in all tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AAJT-S at 250mmHg achieves proximal epigastric compartment pressures of 40mmHg, with or without 500mL simulated free blood in the abdomen. This represents a highly significant and titratable reduction in blood flow within the celiac trunk branches. BMI does not have a clinically significant effect. AAJT-S application also produces zone 3 aortic and inferior vena cava occlusion. AAJT-S may be a point-of-injury intervention for forward medics that contributes to non-surgical hemorrhage control and likely clot stabilization for zone 1 vascular and solid organ injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/KWGY-MP81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: "Non-compressible" torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is the leading cause of preventable battlefield death, requiring rapid surgical or radiological intervention, which is essentially precluded close to the point of injury. UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) analysis 2002-2012 showed 85.5% NCTH mortality. JTTR vascular injury data 2003-2008 revealed 100% mortality in named truncal vessel injuries. Gas insufflation and hyper-pressure intraperitoneal fluid animal studies have demonstrated significant reductions in blood loss in splanchnic injuries. We hypothesized that the noninvasive Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquet - Stabilized ( AAJT-S) would be a forward combat medic-delivered intervention to tamponade bleeding from vessels of the celiac trunk in descending aorta zone 1 by generating clinically significant proximal epigastric compartment pressure.

Methods: Four cadaveric donors each had two manometric water-filled balloons placed intra-peritoneally (1 epigastric, 1 retropubic), con- nected to manometer tubing. Baseline pressures of 8cmH2O were set (equating mean intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). AAJT-S was applied and inflated to 250mmHg. Pressures were contemporaneously recorded. AAJT-S was removed, along with the epigastric manometer. We added 500mL of water to simulate blood through the epigastric aperture. The manometer was replaced and reset to 8cmH2O. AAJT-S was reapplied to 250mmHg, and IAP steady pressures were again recorded.

Results: Proximal compartment pressures reached a mean of 54.6cmH2O (40.2mmHg); distal compartment pressures achieved a mean of 46cmH2O (34mmHg.) With 500mL intra peritoneal fluid, proximal compartment achieved a mean of 52.25cmH2O (38.4mmHg); distal compartment achieved a mean of 35cmH2O (25.7mmHg.) BMI had a statistically significant inverse effect on epigastric pressure, in this study range (BMIs, 16.7-22.9kg/m2). This proved clinically insignificant, with sufficient pressure still achieved in all tests.

Conclusion: The AAJT-S at 250mmHg achieves proximal epigastric compartment pressures of 40mmHg, with or without 500mL simulated free blood in the abdomen. This represents a highly significant and titratable reduction in blood flow within the celiac trunk branches. BMI does not have a clinically significant effect. AAJT-S application also produces zone 3 aortic and inferior vena cava occlusion. AAJT-S may be a point-of-injury intervention for forward medics that contributes to non-surgical hemorrhage control and likely clot stabilization for zone 1 vascular and solid organ injuries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹主动脉结缔组织止血带:在一项尸体研究中,与战斗医务人员治疗不可压缩性躯干出血直接相关的主动脉1区和3区压力升高具有临床意义。
背景:“不可压缩性”躯干出血(NCTH)是可预防的战场死亡的主要原因,需要快速手术或放射干预,基本上是在接近受伤点的地方被排除。英国联合手术室创伤登记处(JTTR) 2002-2012年分析显示,nth死亡率为85.5%。2003-2008年JTTR血管损伤数据显示,命名的躯干血管损伤死亡率为100%。动物研究表明,充气和高压腹腔内液体可以显著减少内脏损伤的失血量。我们假设无创腹主动脉结缔组织稳定止血带(AAJT-S)可以通过产生临床上显著的近端胃隔室压力,作为一种前沿战斗医疗干预手段,用于压塞降主动脉1区腹腔干血管出血。方法:4例尸体供体分别在腹膜内(1个上腹部,1个耻骨后)放置2个测压充水气球,并连接测压管。设定8cmH2O的基线压力(等于平均腹内压(IAP))。应用AAJT-S,充气至250mmHg。同时记录压力。取下AAJT-S,同时取下上腹压力计。我们加入500mL的水来模拟血液通过上胃孔。更换压力计并复位为8cmH2O。再次应用AAJT-S至250mmHg,再次记录IAP稳定压力。结果:近端室压平均达到54.6cmH2O (40.2mmHg);远端腔室压力平均达到46cmH2O (34mmHg)。腹腔积液500mL时,近端腔室平均为52.25cmH2O (38.4mmHg);远端腔室平均达到35cmH2O (25.7mmHg)。在本研究范围内(BMI, 16.7-22.9kg/m2), BMI对上胃压有统计学上显著的反作用。这在临床上被证明是不显著的,在所有的测试中仍然有足够的压力。结论:AAJT-S在250mmHg时达到上腹部近端腔室压40mmHg,腹腔有或无500mL模拟游离血。这表明腹腔主干分支内的血流显著减少,可滴定。BMI在临床上没有显著的影响。AAJT-S的应用也产生3区主动脉和下腔静脉闭塞。AAJT-S可能是前方医护人员的一种损伤点干预,有助于非手术出血控制和1区血管和实体器官损伤的可能凝块稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
The Use of Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Devices by Medics on a Manikin with Night Vision Goggles: A Pilot Study. Special Operations Forces Lessons Learned: Beirut Blast. Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquets: Clinically Important Increases in Pressure in Aortic Zone 1 and Zone 3 in a Cadaveric Study Directly Relevant to Combat Medics Treating Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage. Chronicity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison of Special Operators and Conventional Forces. On Saving - The Psychosocial Benefit of Saving Lives in War and Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1