Feasibility and Acceptability of the We See You, Sis Sister Circle for Black Women With Depression Symptoms

Kia Skrine Jeffers, Felica Jones, O. Kenrik Duru
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of the We See You, Sis Sister Circle for Black Women With Depression Symptoms","authors":"Kia Skrine Jeffers,&nbsp;Felica Jones,&nbsp;O. Kenrik Duru","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test the feasibility and acceptability of We See You, Sis, a therapeutically grounded virtual sister circle intervention for Black women with depression symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A two-group quasi-experimental design.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Virtual on the Zoom version 5.13 platform.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Black women who were at least 40 years of age, with current depression symptoms, who had reliable access to Zoom (<em>N</em> = 30).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We See You, Sis is a virtual sister circle intervention that is therapeutically grounded in the core processes of Pulling Out of Fire, a culturally adapted version of acceptance and commitment therapy. Groups 1 and 2 received the 6-week intervention during Weeks 1 through 6 and 7 through 12, respectively. The main outcomes were feasibility (recruitment, retention, and completion) and acceptability. The theoretical framework of acceptability informed the focus group guide used to assess acceptability. We used thematic analysis to code the qualitative data and to identify salient themes across participants’ narratives.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Recruitment (70%), retention (83.3%), and completion (82%) rates demonstrated that the intervention was feasible. Participants perceived the intervention to be acceptable, especially because it fit with their personal and collective values. We generated two overarching themes: <em>Becoming More Whole</em> and <em>Having a Trusted Space to Address Depression Symptoms and Related Experiences</em>, which represented the interconnected processes of personal growth and collective healing that occurred throughout the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings provide evidence to support the delivery of peer-delivered mental health interventions for middle-age and older Black women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"54 1","pages":"Pages 32-37.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088421752400337X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To test the feasibility and acceptability of We See You, Sis, a therapeutically grounded virtual sister circle intervention for Black women with depression symptoms.

Design

A two-group quasi-experimental design.

Setting

Virtual on the Zoom version 5.13 platform.

Participants

Black women who were at least 40 years of age, with current depression symptoms, who had reliable access to Zoom (N = 30).

Method

We See You, Sis is a virtual sister circle intervention that is therapeutically grounded in the core processes of Pulling Out of Fire, a culturally adapted version of acceptance and commitment therapy. Groups 1 and 2 received the 6-week intervention during Weeks 1 through 6 and 7 through 12, respectively. The main outcomes were feasibility (recruitment, retention, and completion) and acceptability. The theoretical framework of acceptability informed the focus group guide used to assess acceptability. We used thematic analysis to code the qualitative data and to identify salient themes across participants’ narratives.

Results

Recruitment (70%), retention (83.3%), and completion (82%) rates demonstrated that the intervention was feasible. Participants perceived the intervention to be acceptable, especially because it fit with their personal and collective values. We generated two overarching themes: Becoming More Whole and Having a Trusted Space to Address Depression Symptoms and Related Experiences, which represented the interconnected processes of personal growth and collective healing that occurred throughout the intervention.

Conclusion

The findings provide evidence to support the delivery of peer-delivered mental health interventions for middle-age and older Black women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人抑郁症女性“我们看到你,姐妹”圈子的可行性和可接受性
目的:检验基于治疗基础的虚拟姐妹圈干预黑人抑郁女性的可行性和可接受性。设计:两组准实验设计。设置:Zoom平台上的虚拟。参与者:至少40岁,目前有抑郁症状,有可靠途径使用Zoom的黑人女性(N = 30)。方法:我们看到你,姐姐是一个虚拟的姐妹圈干预,以治疗为基础的核心过程拔出火,一个文化适应版本的接受和承诺治疗。1组和2组分别在第1 ~ 6周和第7 ~ 12周接受为期6周的干预。主要结果是可行性(招募、保留和完成)和可接受性。可接受性的理论框架为评估可接受性的焦点小组指南提供了依据。我们使用主题分析对定性数据进行编码,并确定参与者叙述中的突出主题。结果:招募率(70%)、保留率(83.3%)和完成率(82%)表明干预是可行的。参与者认为这种干预是可以接受的,特别是因为它符合他们的个人和集体价值观。我们产生了两个总体主题:变得更加完整和拥有一个值得信赖的空间来解决抑郁症状和相关经历,这代表了在整个干预过程中发生的个人成长和集体治愈的相互关联的过程。结论:本研究结果为中老年黑人妇女提供同伴心理健康干预提供了证据支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Call to Action to Quantify Non-Severe and Severe Maternal Morbidity. Ventilatory Assistance Before Umbilical Cord Clamping in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Barriers to Diagnosis and Innovations in Care for Endometriosis. Nursing Safety on the Job: Workplace Violence and Personal Protection. Qualitative Study of Experiences with an Interprofessional Perinatal Care Team Among Women Who Used Substances During the Perinatal Period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1