International experts consensus on optimal central vascular access device selection and management for patients with cancer.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1177/11297298241300792
Mohammad Jahanzeb, Ching-Yang Wu, Howard Lim, Kei Muro, Lichao Xu, Manjiri Somashekhar, S P Sampige Prasannakumar Somashekhar, Xiaotao Zhang, Xiaoxia Qiu, Ying Fu, Mauro Pittiruti
{"title":"International experts consensus on optimal central vascular access device selection and management for patients with cancer.","authors":"Mohammad Jahanzeb, Ching-Yang Wu, Howard Lim, Kei Muro, Lichao Xu, Manjiri Somashekhar, S P Sampige Prasannakumar Somashekhar, Xiaotao Zhang, Xiaoxia Qiu, Ying Fu, Mauro Pittiruti","doi":"10.1177/11297298241300792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with cancer, the choice of an appropriate venous access device is crucial for effective treatment, minimizing complications, and reducing healthcare costs. Key management decisions, such as the timing of device removal post-therapy, can impact clinical outcomes. As current international guidelines lack specific directives for these issues, a global consensus of experts, representing different countries, was deemed appropriate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 11 experts from three continents, including oncologists and healthcare professionals, was chosen. After a comprehensive review of clinical trials and guidelines on central venous access devices (CVAD) in oncology published between January 2013 and December 2023, the panel developed and voted on specific recommendations for the selection and management of CVADs in patients with cancer, during a 2-day meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel reached consensus on 10 issues concerning (a) indications for a CVAD, (b) available options for CVADs, (c) role of the staff and patients in the choice of CVAD, (d) factors influencing the selection of a port over an external catheter, (e) logistical requirements for port and external catheter insertion, (f) stakeholders responsible for port and external catheter insertion, (g) factors determining the removal of a port after completing the definitive therapy, and (h) recommended frequency of flushing when the CVAD is not in use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the consensus may offer healthcare professionals a global view of some critical issues concerning CVADs for cancer therapy, helping to establish recommendations for local clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298241300792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241300792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with cancer, the choice of an appropriate venous access device is crucial for effective treatment, minimizing complications, and reducing healthcare costs. Key management decisions, such as the timing of device removal post-therapy, can impact clinical outcomes. As current international guidelines lack specific directives for these issues, a global consensus of experts, representing different countries, was deemed appropriate.

Methods: A panel of 11 experts from three continents, including oncologists and healthcare professionals, was chosen. After a comprehensive review of clinical trials and guidelines on central venous access devices (CVAD) in oncology published between January 2013 and December 2023, the panel developed and voted on specific recommendations for the selection and management of CVADs in patients with cancer, during a 2-day meeting.

Results: The panel reached consensus on 10 issues concerning (a) indications for a CVAD, (b) available options for CVADs, (c) role of the staff and patients in the choice of CVAD, (d) factors influencing the selection of a port over an external catheter, (e) logistical requirements for port and external catheter insertion, (f) stakeholders responsible for port and external catheter insertion, (g) factors determining the removal of a port after completing the definitive therapy, and (h) recommended frequency of flushing when the CVAD is not in use.

Conclusions: The results of the consensus may offer healthcare professionals a global view of some critical issues concerning CVADs for cancer therapy, helping to establish recommendations for local clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际专家对癌症患者最佳中央血管通路装置的选择和管理达成共识。
背景:在癌症患者中,选择合适的静脉通路装置对于有效治疗、减少并发症和降低医疗费用至关重要。关键的管理决策,如治疗后器械移除的时间,可以影响临床结果。由于目前的国际准则缺乏针对这些问题的具体指示,代表不同国家的专家达成全球共识被认为是适当的。方法:选择了来自三大洲的11位专家,包括肿瘤学家和医疗保健专业人员。在对2013年1月至2023年12月期间发表的肿瘤中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)的临床试验和指南进行全面审查后,该小组在为期2天的会议上制定并投票了针对癌症患者中心静脉通路装置的选择和管理的具体建议。结果:专家组就10个问题达成共识,涉及(a) CVAD的适应症,(b) CVAD的可用方案,(c)工作人员和患者在CVAD选择中的作用,(d)影响选择端口而非外部导管的因素,(e)端口和外部导管插入的后勤要求,(f)负责端口和外部导管插入的利益相关者,(g)完成最终治疗后决定移除端口的因素。(h)当CVAD不使用时,建议的冲洗频率。结论:共识的结果可能为医疗保健专业人员提供有关心血管疾病治疗癌症的一些关键问题的全球观点,有助于为当地临床实践建立建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Centrally inserted central catheter placement using a novel, handheld, image-guided, robotic device: Results of initial feasibility trial in patients. Establishing an advanced nursing vascular access programme in a children's hospital: A successful journey. Retraction: Novel electrospun polyurethane grafts for vascular access in rats. Feasibility and Safety of bedside placement of tunneled dialysis catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Retained foreign body in radial artery: Endovascular retrieval and salvage of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1