Where do we go from here? Reconciling implementation failure of PrEP for Black women in the South. Leveraging critical realism to identify unaddressed barriers as we move forward.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2024.1449554
Whitney C Irie, Anais Mahone, Renee Heffron, Latesha Elopre
{"title":"Where do we go from here? Reconciling implementation failure of PrEP for Black women in the South. Leveraging critical realism to identify unaddressed barriers as we move forward.","authors":"Whitney C Irie, Anais Mahone, Renee Heffron, Latesha Elopre","doi":"10.3389/frph.2024.1449554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PrEP, a highly effective HIV prevention measure, provides autonomy to individuals in managing their HIV acquisition vulnerability. Despite its availability in tenofovir-based oral pills and injectable cabotegravir formulations, PrEP uptake among Black cisgender women in the U.S. South, a region with a high HIV burden, remains critically low. This demographic faces a disproportionately high rate of new HIV diagnoses, yet fewer than 10% of women in the US who could benefit from PrEP are currently receiving it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a critical realism interpretative framework, this narrative review employed a tri-level analysis strategy to examine the empirical, actual, and real domains influencing PrEP implementation among Black women in the Southern U.S. The empirical level refers to observable events and data (e.g., PrEP uptake rates), the actual level encompasses experiences and actions that may not always be directly observed (e.g., healthcare interactions and community engagement), and the real level involves the deeper structures and mechanisms (e.g., systemic racism and cultural narratives) that shape these outcomes. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed and other sources was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake in this population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed significant barriers, including structural violence, socioeconomic disparities, medical mistrust, stigma, and inadequate healthcare policies. Empirical data showed variability in PrEP awareness and interest among Black women, while actual experiences highlighted misaligned marketing strategies, financial constraints, and interpersonal dynamics. At the real level, underlying mechanisms such as systemic racism and cultural narratives were identified as critical impediments to PrEP uptake.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Addressing these multifaceted barriers requires a comprehensive, multi-level approach that integrates personalized, community-centric strategies. Emphasizing the need for healthcare providers, community leaders, researchers, and policymakers to collaborate, the review proposes actionable strategies to enhance PrEP implementation, focusing on education, structural reforms, and policy changes to improve access and acceptability among Black women in the South.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1449554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2024.1449554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: PrEP, a highly effective HIV prevention measure, provides autonomy to individuals in managing their HIV acquisition vulnerability. Despite its availability in tenofovir-based oral pills and injectable cabotegravir formulations, PrEP uptake among Black cisgender women in the U.S. South, a region with a high HIV burden, remains critically low. This demographic faces a disproportionately high rate of new HIV diagnoses, yet fewer than 10% of women in the US who could benefit from PrEP are currently receiving it.

Methods: Utilizing a critical realism interpretative framework, this narrative review employed a tri-level analysis strategy to examine the empirical, actual, and real domains influencing PrEP implementation among Black women in the Southern U.S. The empirical level refers to observable events and data (e.g., PrEP uptake rates), the actual level encompasses experiences and actions that may not always be directly observed (e.g., healthcare interactions and community engagement), and the real level involves the deeper structures and mechanisms (e.g., systemic racism and cultural narratives) that shape these outcomes. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed and other sources was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake in this population.

Results: The analysis revealed significant barriers, including structural violence, socioeconomic disparities, medical mistrust, stigma, and inadequate healthcare policies. Empirical data showed variability in PrEP awareness and interest among Black women, while actual experiences highlighted misaligned marketing strategies, financial constraints, and interpersonal dynamics. At the real level, underlying mechanisms such as systemic racism and cultural narratives were identified as critical impediments to PrEP uptake.

Discussion: Addressing these multifaceted barriers requires a comprehensive, multi-level approach that integrates personalized, community-centric strategies. Emphasizing the need for healthcare providers, community leaders, researchers, and policymakers to collaborate, the review proposes actionable strategies to enhance PrEP implementation, focusing on education, structural reforms, and policy changes to improve access and acceptability among Black women in the South.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们从这里往哪里走?调和南方黑人妇女PrEP实施失败。利用批判现实主义,在我们前进的过程中找出尚未解决的障碍。
前言:PrEP是一种非常有效的艾滋病毒预防措施,它为个人提供了管理其艾滋病毒感染脆弱性的自主权。尽管有以替诺福韦为基础的口服药片和可注射的卡波特韦制剂,但在美国南部这个艾滋病病毒负担高的地区,非性别黑人妇女的PrEP使用率仍然非常低。这一人群面临着不成比例的高艾滋病毒新诊断率,但在美国,只有不到10%的可能受益于PrEP的女性目前正在接受这种治疗。方法:利用批判现实主义解释框架,本叙述性综述采用三层次分析策略来检查影响美国南部黑人妇女实施PrEP的经验、实际和真实领域。经验层面是指可观察到的事件和数据(例如,PrEP吸收率),实际层面包括可能并不总是直接观察到的经验和行动(例如,医疗保健互动和社区参与)。真正的层面涉及塑造这些结果的更深层次的结构和机制(例如,系统性的种族主义和文化叙事)。对PubMed和其他来源的同行评议文献进行了全面搜索,以确定该人群接受PrEP的障碍和促进因素。结果:分析揭示了显著的障碍,包括结构性暴力、社会经济差异、医疗不信任、耻辱和不充分的医疗保健政策。经验数据显示,黑人女性在PrEP意识和兴趣方面存在差异,而实际经验则突出了不一致的营销策略、财务限制和人际关系动态。在现实层面,诸如系统性种族主义和文化叙事等潜在机制被认为是预防PrEP吸收的关键障碍。讨论:解决这些多方面的障碍需要一个综合的、多层次的方法,整合个性化的、以社区为中心的策略。该综述强调医疗保健提供者、社区领导人、研究人员和政策制定者合作的必要性,提出了加强PrEP实施的可行战略,重点放在教育、结构改革和政策变化上,以改善南方黑人妇女的获取和接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges faced by community health volunteers in offering sexual and reproductive health care services to young women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Khwisero and Nairobi in Kenya. Primary dysmenorrhea and its associated factors among female high school students in Nekemte town, East Wallaga Zone, Western Oromia, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Experiences of infertility among couples in Morocco. Identification of deleterious variants associated with male infertility genes in a cohort of idiopathic hypospermatogenesis patients. Critical appraisal and narrative review of the literature in IVF/ICSI patients with adenomyosis and endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1