Exploring pre-requisites for clinical learning indicators: A scoping review.

Evelyn B Chilemba, Felistas Chiundira, Chrissie Phiri, Felix Chisoni
{"title":"Exploring pre-requisites for clinical learning indicators: A scoping review.","authors":"Evelyn B Chilemba, Felistas Chiundira, Chrissie Phiri, Felix Chisoni","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Understanding how clinical learning takes place and what could stand as an indicator of clinical learning is crucial. There are existing challenges in the clinical learning environment that require clinical indicators. These serve as accountability standards in settings that have challenges of human resources and material poverty. Thus, clinical indicators are pre-requisites for self-regulation and self-directedness to promote lifelong learning. The reality that exists in today's Malawian health education institutions and clinical settings requires that those in training receive support and guidance on how essential competencies and skills can be acquired during training.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> The objective of this scoping review was to identify current literature on clinical learning indicators among health professional students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> The Joanna Briggs Institute's (May 2020) standards for scoping reviews including narrative synthesis were followed in the conduct of this review. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/yj9nr.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The results generated seven themes on clinical learning process and these are (1) planning for learning, (2) awareness of self-directedness in clinical learning, (3) knowledge of achievement of learning outcomes, (4) educators' evidence of students' clinical learning, (5) students' perspective on clinical learning, (6) students' knowledge of achievement in practice and (7) impact of prior knowledge on clinical learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Clinical learning indicators among undergraduate health professionals are essential and clinical learning should be a planned endeavour by the students before the clinical placement settings.Contribution: This study contributed to understanding clinical learning indicators and self-regulated learning practices among healthcare students.</p>","PeriodicalId":93959,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"47 1","pages":"e1-e14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Understanding how clinical learning takes place and what could stand as an indicator of clinical learning is crucial. There are existing challenges in the clinical learning environment that require clinical indicators. These serve as accountability standards in settings that have challenges of human resources and material poverty. Thus, clinical indicators are pre-requisites for self-regulation and self-directedness to promote lifelong learning. The reality that exists in today's Malawian health education institutions and clinical settings requires that those in training receive support and guidance on how essential competencies and skills can be acquired during training.

Objectives:  The objective of this scoping review was to identify current literature on clinical learning indicators among health professional students.

Method:  The Joanna Briggs Institute's (May 2020) standards for scoping reviews including narrative synthesis were followed in the conduct of this review. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/yj9nr.

Results:  The results generated seven themes on clinical learning process and these are (1) planning for learning, (2) awareness of self-directedness in clinical learning, (3) knowledge of achievement of learning outcomes, (4) educators' evidence of students' clinical learning, (5) students' perspective on clinical learning, (6) students' knowledge of achievement in practice and (7) impact of prior knowledge on clinical learning.

Conclusion:  Clinical learning indicators among undergraduate health professionals are essential and clinical learning should be a planned endeavour by the students before the clinical placement settings.Contribution: This study contributed to understanding clinical learning indicators and self-regulated learning practices among healthcare students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索临床学习指标的先决条件:范围审查。
背景:了解临床学习是如何发生的以及什么可以作为临床学习的指标是至关重要的。临床学习环境存在挑战,需要临床指标。在面临人力资源和物质贫困挑战的环境中,这些标准可作为问责标准。因此,临床指标是自我调节和自我指导以促进终身学习的先决条件。今天马拉维保健教育机构和临床环境的现实情况要求培训人员在培训期间如何获得基本能力和技能方面得到支持和指导。目的:本综述的目的是确定当前有关卫生专业学生临床学习指标的文献。方法:本综述遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所(2020年5月)的范围评估标准,包括叙事综合。该方案已在开放科学框架https://osf.io/yj9nr.Results中注册:结果产生了七个关于临床学习过程的主题,它们是(1)学习计划,(2)临床学习的自我指导意识,(3)学习成果的实现知识,(4)教育者对学生临床学习的证据,(5)学生对临床学习的看法,(6)学生对实践成就的认识和(7)先验知识对临床学习的影响。结论:本科卫生专业人员临床学习指标是必要的,临床学习应是学生在临床实习前有计划的努力。贡献:本研究有助于了解卫生保健专业学生的临床学习指标和自我调节学习实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do socio-cultural practices by elderly women influence obstetric complications? A study in Limpopo province. Corrigendum: Mental health review board members' understanding of the policy guideline on 72-hour assessment. Perceptions of Lesotho nurse-midwives regarding post-partum depression management. Empowering a Limpopo rural community to Integrate Ubuntu in caring for PLWHIV/AIDS or TB. Exploring pre-requisites for clinical learning indicators: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1