Overthinking over Screens: Girls Ruminate More After Negative Social Media Interactions with Peers Compared to In-Person Interactions

Abstract

With the rise and ubiquity of social media (SM), the context for peer interactions has changed drastically for adolescents, yet, little is known about how digital peer interactions compare to in-person interactions in their impact on adolescents’ emotional experiences. Adolescents employ various emotion regulation (ER) strategies to navigate the complexities of peer interactions, with varying strategy adaptiveness and efficacy. This study delves into the prevalence of ER strategies following daily negative peer interactions on SM, exploring to what extent context (SM or in-person) influences the selection of ER strategies. Over 16 days, 106 U.S. adolescent girls, aged 11–13 (half at high risk for developing an affective disorder), participated in ecological momentary assessments, detailing their worst recent peer interactions, the context (SM or in-person), and the subsequent ER strategies employed. Multilevel models revealed that teens were more prone to rumination after negative peer interactions on SM than in-person (OR = 2.08, p = .031), after adjusting for the overall prevalence of SM and in-person interactions. No other significant differences emerged in ER strategy selection based on the context of the interaction. Findings highlight that although adolescents may adapt their ER strategy selection to suit the demands of specific interpersonal situations across contexts, negative peer interactions on SM may lead to more rumination, potentially contributing to the link between SM use and depression. We discuss how unique features of SM might elicit rumination, such as SM’s lack of physical social cues and its permanent, public, and asynchronous nature.