Adolescents’ Digital Technology Use, Emotional Dysregulation, and Self-Esteem: No Evidence of Same-Day Linkages

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Affective science Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s42761-024-00282-w
Madison E. Taylor, Stephen M. Schueller, Michael A. Russell, Rick H. Hoyle, Candice L. Odgers
{"title":"Adolescents’ Digital Technology Use, Emotional Dysregulation, and Self-Esteem: No Evidence of Same-Day Linkages","authors":"Madison E. Taylor,&nbsp;Stephen M. Schueller,&nbsp;Michael A. Russell,&nbsp;Rick H. Hoyle,&nbsp;Candice L. Odgers","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00282-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Concerns regarding the potential negative impacts of digital technology use on youth mental health and well-being are high. However, most studies have several methodological limitations: relying on cross-sectional designs and retrospective reports, assessing technology use as an omnibus construct, and focusing on between- instead of within-person comparisons. This study addresses these limitations by prospectively following young adolescents (<i>n</i> = 388) over a 14-day ecological momentary assessment study to test whether adolescents’ digital technology use is linked with self-reported emotional dysregulation and self-esteem and whether these relationships are stronger for adolescent girls than boys. We found no evidence that adolescents experienced higher emotional dysregulation (<i>b</i> = − .02; <i>p</i> = .07) and lower self-esteem (<i>b</i> = .004; <i>p</i> = .32) than they normally do on days where they use more technology than they normally do (within-person). Adolescents with higher average daily technology use over the study period did not experience lower levels of self-esteem (between-person, <i>b</i> = − .02; <i>p</i> = .13). Adolescents with higher average daily technology use across the two-week period did report higher levels of emotional dysregulation (<i>p</i> = .01), albeit the between-person relation was small (<i>b</i> = .08). There was no evidence that gender moderated the associations, both between and within adolescents (<i>b</i>s = − .02–.13, <i>p</i> = .06 − .55). Our findings contribute to the growing counter-narrative that technology use does not have as large of an impact on adolescents’ mental health and well-being as the public is concerned about.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 4","pages":"458 - 467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-024-00282-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00282-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns regarding the potential negative impacts of digital technology use on youth mental health and well-being are high. However, most studies have several methodological limitations: relying on cross-sectional designs and retrospective reports, assessing technology use as an omnibus construct, and focusing on between- instead of within-person comparisons. This study addresses these limitations by prospectively following young adolescents (n = 388) over a 14-day ecological momentary assessment study to test whether adolescents’ digital technology use is linked with self-reported emotional dysregulation and self-esteem and whether these relationships are stronger for adolescent girls than boys. We found no evidence that adolescents experienced higher emotional dysregulation (b = − .02; p = .07) and lower self-esteem (b = .004; p = .32) than they normally do on days where they use more technology than they normally do (within-person). Adolescents with higher average daily technology use over the study period did not experience lower levels of self-esteem (between-person, b = − .02; p = .13). Adolescents with higher average daily technology use across the two-week period did report higher levels of emotional dysregulation (p = .01), albeit the between-person relation was small (b = .08). There was no evidence that gender moderated the associations, both between and within adolescents (bs = − .02–.13, p = .06 − .55). Our findings contribute to the growing counter-narrative that technology use does not have as large of an impact on adolescents’ mental health and well-being as the public is concerned about.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年数字技术使用、情绪失调和自尊:无当日联系证据
人们高度关注数字技术使用对青少年心理健康和福祉的潜在负面影响。然而,大多数研究都有一些方法上的局限性:依赖于横断面设计和回顾性报告,评估技术使用作为一个综合结构,并侧重于人与人之间的比较,而不是人与人之间的比较。本研究通过前瞻性跟踪年轻青少年(n = 388)进行为期14天的生态瞬时评估研究来解决这些局限性,以测试青少年的数字技术使用是否与自我报告的情绪失调和自尊有关,以及这些关系是否在青春期女孩中比男孩更强。我们没有发现证据表明青少年经历了更高的情绪失调(b = - 0.02;P = .07)和较低的自尊(b = .004;P = .32)比他们平时(面对面)使用更多技术的日子做得更多。在研究期间,平均每天使用更多科技产品的青少年并没有经历更低水平的自尊(人与人之间,b = - 0.02;p = .13)。在两周的时间里,平均每天使用更多科技产品的青少年确实报告了更高水平的情绪失调(p = 0.01),尽管人与人之间的关系很小(b = 0.08)。没有证据表明性别调节了青少年之间和青少年内部的关联(bs = - 0.02 -)。13, p = .06 - .55)。我们的研究结果有助于反驳越来越多的说法,即技术使用对青少年心理健康和福祉的影响并不像公众所关注的那样大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain expression and decoding as intergroup phenomena. Interdependent Partners Experience Stronger Affective Responses to Simultaneous Positive and Negative Social Feedback. Anhedonia and Daily Emotional Experiences Among Mothers of Preschool Children: an Experiential Sampling Study Investigating the Structure of Emotion: Tools, Pitfalls and Recommendations Do Children’s Attachment Security and Empathy Facilitate Story Appreciation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1