Facebook Groups for Multiracial People: A Latent Profile Analysis Reveals Unique User Subtypes and Links with Depressive Symptoms

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Affective science Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1007/s42761-024-00268-8
Rebecca Godard, Susan Holtzman
{"title":"Facebook Groups for Multiracial People: A Latent Profile Analysis Reveals Unique User Subtypes and Links with Depressive Symptoms","authors":"Rebecca Godard,&nbsp;Susan Holtzman","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00268-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social media (SM) groups can connect users to similar others and may be particularly valuable for marginalized populations who lack support in their offline lives. Prior research highlights substantial heterogeneity in users’ engagement with and experience in SM groups, which may relate to social and emotional health in important ways. The current study used a cross-sectional survey of users of Facebook groups for multiracial people (<i>N</i> = 424) to identify user profiles and test how profiles relate to depressive symptoms and global sense of belonging. Latent profile analysis identified three profiles: (1) <i>casual users</i> (62% of users), who engaged more passively yet experienced moderate levels of belonging in the group; (2) <i>invested users</i> (21%), who reported high active participation, self-disclosure, belonging, and perceived similarity; and (3) <i>dissatisfied users</i> (17%), who reported moderate active and passive use and self-disclosure, yet low belonging and high negative experiences. <i>Invested</i> users reported significantly greater depressive symptoms compared to <i>dissatisfied</i> users (<i>d</i> = .46) and significantly lower global belonging compared to <i>casual</i> users (<i>d</i> =  − .33). Men were more likely to be <i>dissatisfied</i> users, and LGBTQIA + individuals were more likely to be <i>invested</i> users. Findings support the social compensation hypothesis of SM use and the importance of considering gender and sexual orientation in the realm of online group participation. Although further research is needed to clarify causal pathways, findings suggest the potential value of SM groups as a source of connection and support for those who are distressed or lack access to offline support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 4","pages":"468 - 476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00268-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media (SM) groups can connect users to similar others and may be particularly valuable for marginalized populations who lack support in their offline lives. Prior research highlights substantial heterogeneity in users’ engagement with and experience in SM groups, which may relate to social and emotional health in important ways. The current study used a cross-sectional survey of users of Facebook groups for multiracial people (N = 424) to identify user profiles and test how profiles relate to depressive symptoms and global sense of belonging. Latent profile analysis identified three profiles: (1) casual users (62% of users), who engaged more passively yet experienced moderate levels of belonging in the group; (2) invested users (21%), who reported high active participation, self-disclosure, belonging, and perceived similarity; and (3) dissatisfied users (17%), who reported moderate active and passive use and self-disclosure, yet low belonging and high negative experiences. Invested users reported significantly greater depressive symptoms compared to dissatisfied users (d = .46) and significantly lower global belonging compared to casual users (d =  − .33). Men were more likely to be dissatisfied users, and LGBTQIA + individuals were more likely to be invested users. Findings support the social compensation hypothesis of SM use and the importance of considering gender and sexual orientation in the realm of online group participation. Although further research is needed to clarify causal pathways, findings suggest the potential value of SM groups as a source of connection and support for those who are distressed or lack access to offline support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多种族人群的Facebook群组:一项潜在的分析揭示了独特的用户亚型和抑郁症状的联系
社交媒体(SM)群体可以将用户与相似的人联系起来,对于在线下生活中缺乏支持的边缘人群来说,这可能特别有价值。先前的研究强调了SM群体中用户参与和体验的实质性异质性,这可能在重要方面与社会和情感健康有关。目前的研究采用了一项针对多种族人群的Facebook群组用户的横断面调查(N = 424),以确定用户的个人资料,并测试个人资料与抑郁症状和全球归属感之间的关系。潜在特征分析确定了三种特征:(1)休闲用户(62%的用户),他们更被动地参与,但在群体中具有中等程度的归属感;(2)投资用户(21%),他们报告了高度的积极参与、自我披露、归属感和感知相似性;(3)不满意的用户(17%),他们报告了适度的主动和被动使用和自我披露,但归属感低,负面体验高。与不满意的用户相比,投入用户报告的抑郁症状明显更严重(d = 0.46),与普通用户相比,整体归属感明显更低(d = - 0.33)。男性更有可能是不满意的用户,LGBTQIA +个体更有可能是投入的用户。研究结果支持SM使用的社会补偿假说,以及在网络群体参与领域考虑性别和性取向的重要性。虽然需要进一步的研究来澄清因果关系,但研究结果表明,SM群体作为那些痛苦或缺乏线下支持的人的联系和支持来源的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adolescents’ Digital Technology Use, Emotional Dysregulation, and Self-Esteem: No Evidence of Same-Day Linkages Introduction to the Special Section Commentaries Affectivism and the Emotional Elephant: How a Componential Approach Can Reconcile Opposing Theories to Serve the Future of Affective Sciences A Developmental Psychobiologist’s Commentary on the Future of Affective Science What Instagram Means to Me: Links Between Social Anxiety, Instagram Contingent Self-worth, and Automated Textual Analysis of Linguistic Authenticity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1