Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Ambulation and Wheelchair Transfer Ability in Spina Bifida.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.11.013
Gina McKernan, Matt Mesoros, Brad E Dicianno
{"title":"Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Ambulation and Wheelchair Transfer Ability in Spina Bifida.","authors":"Gina McKernan, Matt Mesoros, Brad E Dicianno","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine which statistical techniques enhance our ability to predict ambulation and transfer ability in people with spina bifida (SB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-five US outpatient SB clinic sites.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals (n=4589) with SB aged 5-73 years (median age=13.59y).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Ambulation ability, which consisted of the following categories: community ambulators, household ambulators, therapeutic ambulators, and nonambulators.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcome: </strong>Wheelchair transfer ability, as defined by the ability to transfer in and out of a wheelchair unassisted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A recurrent neural network (RNN) using a multilayer perceptron discarded 76 cases during case processing, resulting in 4513 that were run through the RNN. The predictions in the resulting testing dataset were 83.22% accurate. Recall was 93.21% for community ambulators, 10.00% for household ambulators, 23.96% for therapeutic ambulators, and 76.70% for nonambulators. Precision was 85.34% for community ambulators, 16.05% for household ambulators, 16.67% for therapeutic ambulators, and 93.47% for nonambulators. Total predictions included 68.39% for community ambulators, 2.25% for household ambulators, 3.83% for therapeutic ambulators, and 25.53% for nonambulators. Correspondingly, the model accurately classified 70% of wheelchair transfers while correctly identifying 97.3% of those able to transfer unassisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RNN models hold promise for the prediction of functional outcomes such as ambulation and transfer ability in people with SB, particularly for community ambulators and nonambulators. Compared with the previous work using traditional logistic regression approaches which misclassified 16% of cases, the RNN resulted in greater prediction accuracy with fewer than 7% of cases misclassified.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.11.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine which statistical techniques enhance our ability to predict ambulation and transfer ability in people with spina bifida (SB).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Thirty-five US outpatient SB clinic sites.

Participants: Individuals (n=4589) with SB aged 5-73 years (median age=13.59y).

Intervention: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Ambulation ability, which consisted of the following categories: community ambulators, household ambulators, therapeutic ambulators, and nonambulators.

Secondary outcome: Wheelchair transfer ability, as defined by the ability to transfer in and out of a wheelchair unassisted.

Results: A recurrent neural network (RNN) using a multilayer perceptron discarded 76 cases during case processing, resulting in 4513 that were run through the RNN. The predictions in the resulting testing dataset were 83.22% accurate. Recall was 93.21% for community ambulators, 10.00% for household ambulators, 23.96% for therapeutic ambulators, and 76.70% for nonambulators. Precision was 85.34% for community ambulators, 16.05% for household ambulators, 16.67% for therapeutic ambulators, and 93.47% for nonambulators. Total predictions included 68.39% for community ambulators, 2.25% for household ambulators, 3.83% for therapeutic ambulators, and 25.53% for nonambulators. Correspondingly, the model accurately classified 70% of wheelchair transfers while correctly identifying 97.3% of those able to transfer unassisted.

Conclusions: RNN models hold promise for the prediction of functional outcomes such as ambulation and transfer ability in people with SB, particularly for community ambulators and nonambulators. Compared with the previous work using traditional logistic regression approaches which misclassified 16% of cases, the RNN resulted in greater prediction accuracy with fewer than 7% of cases misclassified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测脊柱裂患者行走和轮椅移动能力的机器学习算法。
目的:确定哪些统计技术可以提高我们预测脊柱裂(SB)患者行走和转移能力的能力。设计:回顾性队列研究设置:35个美国SB门诊站点参与者:SB年龄5-73岁的个体(n=4,589)(中位年龄=13.59)干预措施:不适用主要结局测量:行走能力,包括以下类别:社区救护车、家庭救护车、治疗救护车和非救护车。次要结局:轮椅移动能力,定义为在没有辅助的情况下进出轮椅的能力。利用多层感知器的递归神经网络(RNN)在案例处理过程中丢弃了76个案例,结果通过RNN运行了4513个案例。结果测试数据集中的预测准确率为83.22%。社区门诊车的召回率为93.21%,家庭门诊车为10.00%,治疗门诊车为23.96%,非门诊车为76.70%。社区门诊车、家庭门诊车、治疗门诊车和非门诊车的准确率分别为85.34%、16.05%、16.67%和93.47%。预测结果中,社区救护车68.39%,家庭救护车2.25%,治疗救护车3.83%,非救护车25.53%。相应地,该模型准确分类了70%的轮椅转移,而正确识别了97.3%的能够独立转移的轮椅转移。结论:RNN模型有望预测SB患者的功能结果,如行走和转移能力,特别是对于社区和非行走者。与之前使用传统逻辑回归方法的工作(错误分类16%的病例)相比,RNN的预测精度更高,错误分类的病例少于7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Physiotherapy and Activity Coaching in Multiple Sclerosis (IPAC-MS): Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparative Cost Analysis of Neck Pain Treatments for Medicare Beneficiaries. Corrigendum. Prevalence of Chronic Health Conditions Among People with Disabilities in the United States. Exploring rest advice in fatigue interventions in rehabilitation among adults with long-term conditions: a systematic scoping review of the reporting of rest in randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1