Retinal detachments secondary to inferior retinal breaks: anatomic outcomes following the use of different surgical techniques.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001812
Enrico Bernardi, Lorenzo Ferro Desideri, Dmitri Artemiev, Martin Zinkernagel, Rodrigo Anguita
{"title":"Retinal detachments secondary to inferior retinal breaks: anatomic outcomes following the use of different surgical techniques.","authors":"Enrico Bernardi, Lorenzo Ferro Desideri, Dmitri Artemiev, Martin Zinkernagel, Rodrigo Anguita","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone versus PPV with the addition of a scleral buckle in treating inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comparative, retrospective cohort study including patients who were diagnosed with primary inferior RRD, defined as RRD with one or more retinal tears located between 4 and 8 hours, and divided into two treatment groups. Group 1 patients were treated with PPV and gas tamponade alone, whereas group 2 patients were treated with PPV, gas tamponade and the addition of an encirclement band. Demographic and clinical features were collected, and surgical outcomes of both groups were analysed. A univariable logistic regression model evaluated the factors influencing surgical success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 eyes were included in the study. The average age at diagnosis was 64.1 years. There was a male predominance (66.5%), and most patients had macula-off detachments (54%). Group 1 included 75 eyes (43.1%), whereas group 2 included 86 eyes (56.9%). Baseline best-corrected visual acuity was 1.00 logMAR, improving to 0.62 logMAR at the last visit (p=0.003). No significant difference in primary success rate was observed between the two groups (86.0% with encirclement band vs 80.0% without; p=0.3). The mean follow-up period was 29 weeks (SD 39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPV alone may be as effective as PPV with an encirclement band when treating inferior RRDs. The choice of tamponade does not appear to significantly influence anatomical success, and short-acting gas can be considered sufficient for favourable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone versus PPV with the addition of a scleral buckle in treating inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs).

Methods: Comparative, retrospective cohort study including patients who were diagnosed with primary inferior RRD, defined as RRD with one or more retinal tears located between 4 and 8 hours, and divided into two treatment groups. Group 1 patients were treated with PPV and gas tamponade alone, whereas group 2 patients were treated with PPV, gas tamponade and the addition of an encirclement band. Demographic and clinical features were collected, and surgical outcomes of both groups were analysed. A univariable logistic regression model evaluated the factors influencing surgical success.

Results: A total of 161 eyes were included in the study. The average age at diagnosis was 64.1 years. There was a male predominance (66.5%), and most patients had macula-off detachments (54%). Group 1 included 75 eyes (43.1%), whereas group 2 included 86 eyes (56.9%). Baseline best-corrected visual acuity was 1.00 logMAR, improving to 0.62 logMAR at the last visit (p=0.003). No significant difference in primary success rate was observed between the two groups (86.0% with encirclement band vs 80.0% without; p=0.3). The mean follow-up period was 29 weeks (SD 39).

Conclusions: PPV alone may be as effective as PPV with an encirclement band when treating inferior RRDs. The choice of tamponade does not appear to significantly influence anatomical success, and short-acting gas can be considered sufficient for favourable outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜脱离继发于下视网膜断裂:使用不同手术技术后的解剖结果。
目的:比较单纯玻璃体切除(PPV)与巩膜扣加玻璃体切除(PPV)治疗下孔源性视网膜脱离(rrd)的解剖和功能结果。方法:比较、回顾性队列研究,纳入诊断为原发性下位RRD的患者,定义为RRD在4 ~ 8小时内出现一个或多个视网膜撕裂,并分为两个治疗组。组1患者采用单纯PPV和气体填塞治疗,组2患者采用PPV、气体填塞加围带治疗。收集两组患者的人口学和临床特征,分析两组患者的手术结果。单变量logistic回归模型评估影响手术成功的因素。结果:本研究共纳入161只眼。平均诊断年龄为64.1岁。男性居多(66.5%),多数患者有黄斑脱落(54%)。1组75只眼(43.1%),2组86只眼(56.9%)。基线最佳矫正视力为1.00 logMAR,最后一次就诊时改善至0.62 logMAR (p=0.003)。两组初次成功率无显著差异(有围带组86.0% vs无围带组80.0%;p = 0.3)。平均随访时间为29周(SD 39)。结论:单纯PPV治疗下发性rrd与围带PPV治疗效果相同。填塞的选择似乎对解剖成功没有显著影响,短效气体可以被认为足以获得良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Willingness to donate eyes and associated factors among adults in Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods approach. Association of arterial stiffness and eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of ethnicity and other sociodemographic factors on attendance at ophthalmology appointments following referral from a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme: a retrospective cohort study. Comparative evaluation of funduscopy, PCR and serology in the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis at ECWA Eye Hospital, Kano. Deep learning-based anterior segment identification and parameter assessment of primary angle closure disease in ultrasound biomicroscopy images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1