Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: 5-year follow-up from the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-177 study.

IF 56.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Annals of Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.annonc.2024.11.012
T André, K-K Shiu, T W Kim, B V Jensen, L H Jensen, C J A Punt, D Smith, R Garcia-Carbonero, J Alcaide-Garcia, P Gibbs, C de la Fouchardiere, F Rivera, E Elez, D T Le, T Yoshino, Y Zuo, D Fogelman, D Adelberg, L A Diaz
{"title":"Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: 5-year follow-up from the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-177 study.","authors":"T André, K-K Shiu, T W Kim, B V Jensen, L H Jensen, C J A Punt, D Smith, R Garcia-Carbonero, J Alcaide-Garcia, P Gibbs, C de la Fouchardiere, F Rivera, E Elez, D T Le, T Yoshino, Y Zuo, D Fogelman, D Adelberg, L A Diaz","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Results from the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study established pembrolizumab as a new first-line standard of care for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Previous results from KEYNOTE-177 showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy ± bevacizumab/cetuximab in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Results after >5 years of follow-up are reported.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Adults with untreated MSI-H/dMMR mCRC were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or chemotherapy. Patients assigned to chemotherapy could cross over to pembrolizumab after centrally confirmed progressive disease. Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At data cut-off (17 July 2023), median follow-up was 73.3 months (range, 64.9-89.2 months). Overall, 307 patients were assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n = 153) or chemotherapy (n = 154). Fifty-seven (37.0%) patients assigned to chemotherapy crossed over to pembrolizumab per protocol; 39 (25.3%) received a programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitor off protocol (effective crossover rate, 62%). Median OS was 77.5 months with pembrolizumab versus 36.7 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.99); 5-year OS rates were 54.8% versus 44.2%. Median PFS was 16.5 months with pembrolizumab and 8.2 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.79). Median duration of response was 75.4 months (range, 2.3+ to 80.1+ months) with pembrolizumab versus 10.6 months (range, 2.8 to 71.5+ months) with chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy, fewer patients in the pembrolizumab arm experienced adverse events (80% versus 99%; grade 3-5, 22% versus 67%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With >5 years of follow-up, responses to pembrolizumab remained durable. Median OS was more than twice as long in patients treated with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in first line despite an effective crossover rate of 62%. Pembrolizumab remains a standard of care for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.11.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Results from the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study established pembrolizumab as a new first-line standard of care for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Previous results from KEYNOTE-177 showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy ± bevacizumab/cetuximab in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Results after >5 years of follow-up are reported.

Patients and methods: Adults with untreated MSI-H/dMMR mCRC were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or chemotherapy. Patients assigned to chemotherapy could cross over to pembrolizumab after centrally confirmed progressive disease. Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety.

Results: At data cut-off (17 July 2023), median follow-up was 73.3 months (range, 64.9-89.2 months). Overall, 307 patients were assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n = 153) or chemotherapy (n = 154). Fifty-seven (37.0%) patients assigned to chemotherapy crossed over to pembrolizumab per protocol; 39 (25.3%) received a programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitor off protocol (effective crossover rate, 62%). Median OS was 77.5 months with pembrolizumab versus 36.7 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.99); 5-year OS rates were 54.8% versus 44.2%. Median PFS was 16.5 months with pembrolizumab and 8.2 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.79). Median duration of response was 75.4 months (range, 2.3+ to 80.1+ months) with pembrolizumab versus 10.6 months (range, 2.8 to 71.5+ months) with chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy, fewer patients in the pembrolizumab arm experienced adverse events (80% versus 99%; grade 3-5, 22% versus 67%).

Conclusions: With >5 years of follow-up, responses to pembrolizumab remained durable. Median OS was more than twice as long in patients treated with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in first line despite an effective crossover rate of 62%. Pembrolizumab remains a standard of care for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pembrolizumab对微卫星不稳定性高或错配修复缺陷转移性结直肠癌的化疗:来自随机3期KEYNOTE-177研究的5年随访
背景:KEYNOTE-177 iii期研究的结果确定派姆单抗是微卫星不稳定性高或错配修复缺陷(MSI-H/dMMR)转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的新的一线护理标准。KEYNOTE-177先前的结果显示,在MSI-H/dMMR mCRC中,派姆单抗与化疗±贝伐单抗/西妥昔单抗相比,在无进展生存期(PFS)方面具有统计学意义和临床意义的改善。随访50 ~ 50年,报告随访结果。患者和方法:未经治疗的MSI-H/dMMR mCRC的成人随机按1:1分配,每3周静脉注射200 mg派姆单抗或化疗。在中央确认疾病进展后,分配化疗的患者可以切换到派姆单抗。双重主要终点是RECIST v1.1的PFS和总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括反应持续时间(DOR)和安全性。结果:截至数据截止(2023年7月17日),中位随访时间为73.3个月(范围64.9-89.2)。总体而言,307名患者被分配接受派姆单抗(n=153)或化疗(n=154)。57名(37.0%)患者被分配到化疗方案中使用派姆单抗;39例(25.3%)接受PD-(L)1抑制剂关闭方案(有效交叉率,62%)。派姆单抗组的中位OS为77.5个月,化疗组为36.7个月(风险比[HR], 0.73;95% ci, 0.53-0.99);5年生存率分别为54.8%和44.2%。pembrolizumab组的中位PFS为16.5个月,化疗组为8.2个月(HR, 0.60;95% ci, 0.45-0.79)。pembrolizumab组的DOR中位数为75.4个月(范围,2.3+至80.1+),而化疗组的DOR中位数为10.6个月(范围,2.8 +至71.5+)。与化疗相比,派姆单抗组出现不良事件的患者较少(80%对99%;3-5级,22%对67%)。结论:在50年的随访中,派姆单抗的反应仍然持久。尽管有效交叉率为62%,但一线接受派姆单抗治疗的患者的中位生存期是化疗患者的两倍多。派姆单抗仍然是MSI-H/dMMR mCRC的标准治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Oncology
Annals of Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
63.90
自引率
1.00%
发文量
3712
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine. The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings. Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
期刊最新文献
Teliso-V and osimertinib: the METamorphosis of EGFR-mutant lung cancer? Survival Among Patients Treated with Total Mesorectal Excision or Selective Watch-and-Wait After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Pooled Analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA Randomized Phase II Trials. ESMO Global Consortium Study on the availability, out-of-pocket costs, and accessibility of cancer medicines: 2023 update. A randomised phase III study of bevacizumab and carboplatin-pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without atezolizumab, as first-line treatment for advanced pleural mesothelioma: results of the ETOP 13 18 BEAT-meso trial. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with left-sided resectable pancreatic cancer: an international multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1