Measuring the effectiveness of a radiology-based lecture series on both confidence and career prospects of UK-based undergraduate medical students: a survey-based quantitative study
A. Mushtaq , N. Cinti , M. Yaseen , R. Ho , L. Clunie
{"title":"Measuring the effectiveness of a radiology-based lecture series on both confidence and career prospects of UK-based undergraduate medical students: a survey-based quantitative study","authors":"A. Mushtaq , N. Cinti , M. Yaseen , R. Ho , L. Clunie","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Studies investigating Radiology Teaching within the undergraduate population suggest that medical students do not feel adequately trained in radiological scan interpretation. This study aims to address this shortfall by designing and evaluating a longitudinal teaching series based upon the nationally recognised RCR Curriculum. By doing this, a framework can be provided for other centres to reproduce and develop their own teaching programme.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Participants were pre-clinical and clinical medical students across the United Kingdom. The course consisted of 2 sessions per anatomical system across 6 systems, one covering anatomy and the other pathology. These were Thorax, Abdomen, Musculoskeletal (MSK), Central Nervous System (CNS), Paediatric and Trauma Radiology. Surveys were filled before and after each session with questions on level of training, confidence in interpreting radiological scans out of 10 and outlook on Radiology as a career.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis of 59 pre-lecture and 60 post-lecture feedback forms showed an overall increase in confidence in scan interpretation, from 4/10 points (3-5) which increased to 7/10 points (6-8) (p<0.001). In those who filled both forms, the increase was 51%, from 4.3 ± 1 points to 6.5 ± 1.3 points (p=0.04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results show a promising increase in participants' subjective confidence in interpretation, which can help medical students post-graduation. With most participants reporting their exposure to radiology in medical school being inadequate, this course can serve as a base for formal teaching which educational institutions can refine upon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 106711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024005592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
Studies investigating Radiology Teaching within the undergraduate population suggest that medical students do not feel adequately trained in radiological scan interpretation. This study aims to address this shortfall by designing and evaluating a longitudinal teaching series based upon the nationally recognised RCR Curriculum. By doing this, a framework can be provided for other centres to reproduce and develop their own teaching programme.
Materials and Methods
Participants were pre-clinical and clinical medical students across the United Kingdom. The course consisted of 2 sessions per anatomical system across 6 systems, one covering anatomy and the other pathology. These were Thorax, Abdomen, Musculoskeletal (MSK), Central Nervous System (CNS), Paediatric and Trauma Radiology. Surveys were filled before and after each session with questions on level of training, confidence in interpreting radiological scans out of 10 and outlook on Radiology as a career.
Results
Analysis of 59 pre-lecture and 60 post-lecture feedback forms showed an overall increase in confidence in scan interpretation, from 4/10 points (3-5) which increased to 7/10 points (6-8) (p<0.001). In those who filled both forms, the increase was 51%, from 4.3 ± 1 points to 6.5 ± 1.3 points (p=0.04).
Conclusion
The results show a promising increase in participants' subjective confidence in interpretation, which can help medical students post-graduation. With most participants reporting their exposure to radiology in medical school being inadequate, this course can serve as a base for formal teaching which educational institutions can refine upon.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including:
• Computed tomography
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Ultrasonography
• Digital radiology
• Interventional radiology
• Radiography
• Nuclear medicine
Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.