Ten-year health impact, economic impact and return on investment of the South African molecular diagnostics programme for HIV, tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2.
Brooke E Nichols, Alexandra de Nooy, Naseem Cassim, Lucia Hans, Manuel Pedro da Silva, Kamy Chetty, Kyra H Grantz, Alvin X Han, Andrew N Phillips, Lise Jamieson, Lesley E Scott, Wendy S Stevens
{"title":"Ten-year health impact, economic impact and return on investment of the South African molecular diagnostics programme for HIV, tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"Brooke E Nichols, Alexandra de Nooy, Naseem Cassim, Lucia Hans, Manuel Pedro da Silva, Kamy Chetty, Kyra H Grantz, Alvin X Han, Andrew N Phillips, Lise Jamieson, Lesley E Scott, Wendy S Stevens","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To ensure there is adequate investment into diagnostics, an understanding of the magnitude of impact and return on investment is necessary. We, therefore, sought to understand the health and economic impacts of the molecular diagnostic programme in South Africa, to deepen the understanding of the broad value of diagnostics and guide future healthcare investments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the 10-year (where data were available) total cost and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted associated with molecular testing for tuberculosis diagnosis (2013-2022), HIV viral load monitoring (2013-2022), early infant diagnosis of HIV infection (2013-2022) and SARS-CoV-2 testing (2020-2022), based on the actual number of molecular tests conducted in South Africa for the respective time periods. We then calculated the economic value associated with those health gains and subsequent return on investment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since the inception of the molecular diagnostics programme in South Africa, approximately 4.3 million DALYs (uncertainty range (UR): 2.8-5.8 million) have been averted as a direct consequence of this programme. This has generated an estimated US$28.3 billion in economic value due to these health gains (UR$18.4-UR$38.7 billion). The return on investment varied by specific diagnostic test (20.3 (UR 15.2-25.4) for tuberculosis, 7.7 (UR 1.6-13.9) for HIV viral load testing, 63.0 (UR 63.0-65.5) for early infant diagnosis of HIV and 2.5 (UR 0.7-4.6) for SARS-CoV-2), for an average of 13.9 (UR 9.0-18.9) for the entire molecular diagnostics programme or US$13.9 of value for each UR$1 invested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The molecular diagnostics programme in South Africa generated a significant amount of health gains and economic value associated with these health gains. The return on investment rivals other high-impact public health interventions such as childhood vaccination. The molecular diagnostics programme in South Africa is highly impactful and will continue to be an excellent investment in South African public health expenditure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: To ensure there is adequate investment into diagnostics, an understanding of the magnitude of impact and return on investment is necessary. We, therefore, sought to understand the health and economic impacts of the molecular diagnostic programme in South Africa, to deepen the understanding of the broad value of diagnostics and guide future healthcare investments.
Methods: We calculated the 10-year (where data were available) total cost and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted associated with molecular testing for tuberculosis diagnosis (2013-2022), HIV viral load monitoring (2013-2022), early infant diagnosis of HIV infection (2013-2022) and SARS-CoV-2 testing (2020-2022), based on the actual number of molecular tests conducted in South Africa for the respective time periods. We then calculated the economic value associated with those health gains and subsequent return on investment.
Results: Since the inception of the molecular diagnostics programme in South Africa, approximately 4.3 million DALYs (uncertainty range (UR): 2.8-5.8 million) have been averted as a direct consequence of this programme. This has generated an estimated US$28.3 billion in economic value due to these health gains (UR$18.4-UR$38.7 billion). The return on investment varied by specific diagnostic test (20.3 (UR 15.2-25.4) for tuberculosis, 7.7 (UR 1.6-13.9) for HIV viral load testing, 63.0 (UR 63.0-65.5) for early infant diagnosis of HIV and 2.5 (UR 0.7-4.6) for SARS-CoV-2), for an average of 13.9 (UR 9.0-18.9) for the entire molecular diagnostics programme or US$13.9 of value for each UR$1 invested.
Conclusions: The molecular diagnostics programme in South Africa generated a significant amount of health gains and economic value associated with these health gains. The return on investment rivals other high-impact public health interventions such as childhood vaccination. The molecular diagnostics programme in South Africa is highly impactful and will continue to be an excellent investment in South African public health expenditure.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.