Quality and quantity of carbohydrates, faecal short-chain fatty acids and gastrointestinal symptoms – results from a randomised, controlled trial (CARBFUNC)

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.11.041
Caroline Jensen , Cathrine Horn Sommersten , Johnny Laupsa-Borge , Inghild Storås , Jørgen Valeur , Gunnar Mellgren , Jutta Dierkes , Simon N. Dankel , Gülen Arslan Lied
{"title":"Quality and quantity of carbohydrates, faecal short-chain fatty acids and gastrointestinal symptoms – results from a randomised, controlled trial (CARBFUNC)","authors":"Caroline Jensen ,&nbsp;Cathrine Horn Sommersten ,&nbsp;Johnny Laupsa-Borge ,&nbsp;Inghild Storås ,&nbsp;Jørgen Valeur ,&nbsp;Gunnar Mellgren ,&nbsp;Jutta Dierkes ,&nbsp;Simon N. Dankel ,&nbsp;Gülen Arslan Lied","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.11.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>Diet is a key determinant of gastrointestinal (GI) health, in part in association with microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). However, we need more knowledge of the relative impact of dietary carbohydrate amount and quality on GI symptoms, GI-associated quality of life (QoL) and faecal SCFAs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>193 males and females with obesity were randomly allocated to follow one of three isocaloric, iso-proteinic dietary patterns (2000 kcal/day for females, 2500 kcal/day for males): a higher-carbohydrate lower-fat diet with refined carbohydrate sources (acellular diet, A-HCLF, comparator arm), a higher-carbohydrate lower-fat diet with minimally refined carbohydrate sources (intact cellular structures, cellular diet, C-HCLF), or a low-carbohydrate high-fat diet (LCHF), all low in added sugars. Secondary outcomes of this randomised controlled trial (CARBFUNC) were assessed, i.e., changes in abdominal symptoms (irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system (IBS-SSS)), reflux symptoms (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ)), GI-related QoL (Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI)) and fatigue (Fatigue Impact Scale), and faecal SCFAs concentrations after following the diets for 3 and 12 months. Group differences were analysed by constrained linear mixed effect modelling (cLMM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>118 and 57 participants completed 3 and 12 months of the dietary intervention, respectively, with no significant group differences in weight loss at 12 months (5–7%). At 12 months, the mean daily fibre intake was 34 ± 7 g/day, 41 ± 14.3 g/day, and 18.5 ± 6 g/day on the A-HCLF, C-HCLF and LCHF diet, respectively, compared to 21 ± 7, 21 ± 7 and 20 ± 6 g/day at baseline. We observed no significant between-group difference in IBS-SSS sum score after 3 and 12 months. We found significant improvement in GerdQ score (change score [95 % CI]: −0.62 [−1.18, −0.048], <em>p</em> = 0.034), and SF-NDI sum score (−1.88 [−3.22, −0.52], <em>p</em> = 0.007) after 3 months on the LCHF diet compared to the A-HCLF diet, and GerdQ remained significant at 12 months (−1.03 [−1.88, −0.19], p = 0.017). Compared to the A-HCLF diet, the concentration of faecal butyric acid increased significantly more after 3 months on the C-HCLF diet (4.97 [1.71, 8.23] p = 0.003) and faecal acetic acid decreased more (−6.41 [−12.8, −0.047]. p = 0.048) on the LCHF diet. At 12 months the greater reduction in faecal acetic acid on the LCHF diet remained significant (−9.82 [−19.0, −0.67], p = 0.036), along with significantly greater reductions also in total SCFAs (−21.3 [−38.0, −4.56], p = 0.013), propionic (−4.42 [−7.79, −1.05], p = 0.010), and butyric acid (−5.05 [−9.60, −0.51], p = 0.030).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this sample of adults with obesity and mild GI symptoms at baseline, modest improvements were observed only for the LCHF diet in QoL (at 3 months) and reflux symptoms (at 3 and 12 months), which was significantly different from the acellular carbohydrate diet, and independent of total fibre intake. Concomitantly, compared to the acellular carbohydrate diet, the cellular diet significantly increased the faecal concentration of butyric acid, whereas the LCHF diet lowered acetic acid after 3 months and all the major SCFAs after 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trials identifier</h3><div>NCT03401970. <span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03401970</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424004382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims

Diet is a key determinant of gastrointestinal (GI) health, in part in association with microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). However, we need more knowledge of the relative impact of dietary carbohydrate amount and quality on GI symptoms, GI-associated quality of life (QoL) and faecal SCFAs.

Methods

193 males and females with obesity were randomly allocated to follow one of three isocaloric, iso-proteinic dietary patterns (2000 kcal/day for females, 2500 kcal/day for males): a higher-carbohydrate lower-fat diet with refined carbohydrate sources (acellular diet, A-HCLF, comparator arm), a higher-carbohydrate lower-fat diet with minimally refined carbohydrate sources (intact cellular structures, cellular diet, C-HCLF), or a low-carbohydrate high-fat diet (LCHF), all low in added sugars. Secondary outcomes of this randomised controlled trial (CARBFUNC) were assessed, i.e., changes in abdominal symptoms (irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system (IBS-SSS)), reflux symptoms (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ)), GI-related QoL (Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI)) and fatigue (Fatigue Impact Scale), and faecal SCFAs concentrations after following the diets for 3 and 12 months. Group differences were analysed by constrained linear mixed effect modelling (cLMM).

Results

118 and 57 participants completed 3 and 12 months of the dietary intervention, respectively, with no significant group differences in weight loss at 12 months (5–7%). At 12 months, the mean daily fibre intake was 34 ± 7 g/day, 41 ± 14.3 g/day, and 18.5 ± 6 g/day on the A-HCLF, C-HCLF and LCHF diet, respectively, compared to 21 ± 7, 21 ± 7 and 20 ± 6 g/day at baseline. We observed no significant between-group difference in IBS-SSS sum score after 3 and 12 months. We found significant improvement in GerdQ score (change score [95 % CI]: −0.62 [−1.18, −0.048], p = 0.034), and SF-NDI sum score (−1.88 [−3.22, −0.52], p = 0.007) after 3 months on the LCHF diet compared to the A-HCLF diet, and GerdQ remained significant at 12 months (−1.03 [−1.88, −0.19], p = 0.017). Compared to the A-HCLF diet, the concentration of faecal butyric acid increased significantly more after 3 months on the C-HCLF diet (4.97 [1.71, 8.23] p = 0.003) and faecal acetic acid decreased more (−6.41 [−12.8, −0.047]. p = 0.048) on the LCHF diet. At 12 months the greater reduction in faecal acetic acid on the LCHF diet remained significant (−9.82 [−19.0, −0.67], p = 0.036), along with significantly greater reductions also in total SCFAs (−21.3 [−38.0, −4.56], p = 0.013), propionic (−4.42 [−7.79, −1.05], p = 0.010), and butyric acid (−5.05 [−9.60, −0.51], p = 0.030).

Conclusion

In this sample of adults with obesity and mild GI symptoms at baseline, modest improvements were observed only for the LCHF diet in QoL (at 3 months) and reflux symptoms (at 3 and 12 months), which was significantly different from the acellular carbohydrate diet, and independent of total fibre intake. Concomitantly, compared to the acellular carbohydrate diet, the cellular diet significantly increased the faecal concentration of butyric acid, whereas the LCHF diet lowered acetic acid after 3 months and all the major SCFAs after 12 months.

Clinical trials identifier

NCT03401970. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03401970.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳水化合物的质量和数量、粪便短链脂肪酸和胃肠道症状——来自随机对照试验(CARBFUNC)的结果。
背景与目的:饮食是胃肠道(GI)健康的关键决定因素,在一定程度上与微生物源性短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)有关。然而,我们需要更多地了解饮食碳水化合物的数量和质量对胃肠道症状、胃肠道相关生活质量(QoL)和粪便scfa的相对影响。方法:193名肥胖的男性和女性被随机分配到三种等热量、等蛋白质的饮食模式中(女性2000千卡/天,男性2500千卡/天)。高碳水化合物低脂肪饮食与精制碳水化合物来源(无细胞饮食,a - hclf,比较组),高碳水化合物低脂肪饮食与最低限度的精制碳水化合物来源(完整的细胞结构,细胞饮食,C-HCLF),或低碳水化合物高脂肪饮食(LCHF),都是低添加糖。该随机对照试验(CARBFUNC)的次要结局被评估,即腹部症状(肠易激综合征严重程度评分系统(IBS-SSS))、反流症状(胃食管反流疾病问卷(GerdQ))、gi相关生活质量(短形式Nepean消化不良指数(SF-NDI))和疲劳(疲劳影响量表)的变化,以及饮食3个月和12个月后粪便SCFAs浓度的变化。采用约束线性混合效应模型(cLMM)分析组间差异。结果:118名和57名参与者分别完成了3个月和12个月的饮食干预,12个月时体重减轻的组间差异不显著(5-7%)。在12个月时,A-HCLF、C-HCLF和LCHF饮食组的平均每日纤维摄入量分别为34±7 g/天、41±14.3 g/天和18.5±6 g/天,而基线时为21±7、21±7和20±6 g/天。3个月和12个月后,我们观察到IBS-SSS总评分在组间无显著差异。我们发现,与A-HCLF饮食相比,LCHF饮食3个月后,GerdQ评分(变化评分[95% CI]: -0.62 [-1.18, -0.048], p = 0.034)和SF-NDI总评分(-1.88 [-3.22,-0.52],p = 0.007)有显著改善,12个月时GerdQ仍然显著(-1.03 [-1.88,-0.19],p = 0.017)。与A-HCLF饲粮相比,C-HCLF饲粮3个月后粪便丁酸浓度显著升高(4.97 [1.71,8.23]p = 0.003),粪便乙酸降低(-6.41[-12.8,-0.047])。p = 0.048)。在12个月时,LCHF饮食中粪便乙酸的减少仍然显著(-9.82 [-19.0,-0.67],p = 0.036),同时总scfa (-21.3 [-38.0, -4.56], p = 0.013),丙酸(-4.42 [-7.79,-1.05],p = 0.010)和丁酸(-5.05 [-9.60,-0.51],p = 0.030)的减少也显著更大。结论:在基线时患有肥胖和轻度胃肠道症状的成年人样本中,仅观察到LCHF饮食在生活质量(3个月)和反流症状(3个月和12个月)方面有适度改善,这与无细胞碳水化合物饮食有显著不同,且与总纤维摄入量无关。同时,与非细胞碳水化合物饲粮相比,细胞饲粮显著提高了丁酸的粪便浓度,而LCHF饲粮在3个月后降低了乙酸的浓度,在12个月后降低了所有主要的SCFAs。临床试验标识符:NCT03401970。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03401970。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
期刊最新文献
An umbrella review of meta-analyses on the effects of microbial therapy in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease Muscle mass mediates the association between dietary diversity and mortality among the older adults: A prospective cohort study Serum tryptophan and kynurenine levels and risk of heart failure among patients with chronic kidney disease On how to feed critically ill children in intensive care: A slowly shifting paradigm Effect of ultra-processed food consumption on the gut microbiota in the first year of life: Findings from the MINA–Brazil birth cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1