Impact of Angiographically Detected Residual Trabeculation After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using the WATCHMAN Device: Insight From the OCEAN-LAAC Registry

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1111/jce.16517
Ryuki Chatani, Shunsuke Kubo, Naoki Nishiura, Kazunori Mushiake, Sachiyo Ono, Takeshi Maruo, Kazushige Kadota, Mitsuru Sago, Shuhei Tanaka, Masahiko Asami, Daisuke Hachinohe, Toru Naganuma, Yohei Ohno, Tomoyuki Tani, Hideharu Okamatsu, Kazuki Mizutani, Yusuke Watanabe, Masaki Izumo, Mike Saji, Shingo Mizuno, Hiroshi Ueno, Shinichi Shirai, Masaki Nakashima, Masanori Yamamoto, Kentaro Hayashida, OCEAN-LAAC investigators
{"title":"Impact of Angiographically Detected Residual Trabeculation After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using the WATCHMAN Device: Insight From the OCEAN-LAAC Registry","authors":"Ryuki Chatani,&nbsp;Shunsuke Kubo,&nbsp;Naoki Nishiura,&nbsp;Kazunori Mushiake,&nbsp;Sachiyo Ono,&nbsp;Takeshi Maruo,&nbsp;Kazushige Kadota,&nbsp;Mitsuru Sago,&nbsp;Shuhei Tanaka,&nbsp;Masahiko Asami,&nbsp;Daisuke Hachinohe,&nbsp;Toru Naganuma,&nbsp;Yohei Ohno,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Tani,&nbsp;Hideharu Okamatsu,&nbsp;Kazuki Mizutani,&nbsp;Yusuke Watanabe,&nbsp;Masaki Izumo,&nbsp;Mike Saji,&nbsp;Shingo Mizuno,&nbsp;Hiroshi Ueno,&nbsp;Shinichi Shirai,&nbsp;Masaki Nakashima,&nbsp;Masanori Yamamoto,&nbsp;Kentaro Hayashida,&nbsp;OCEAN-LAAC investigators","doi":"10.1111/jce.16517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research on the impact of angiographically detected residual trabeculation after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and clinical implications of angiographically detected residual trabeculation after LAAC using the WATCHMAN device.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 1350 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing LAAC using the WATCHMAN device from the OCEAN-LAAC registry, which is a prospective ongoing, multicenter Japanese registry. The inclusion criteria comprised patients who successfully underwent LAAC and whose presence or absence of residual trabeculation can be confirmed using a contrast medium. The clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without angiographically detected residual trabeculation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Residual trabeculation was angiographically detected in 5.6% (75/1350 patients). At the procedure, the proportion of peri-device leak (PDL) was significantly higher in the residual trabeculation group than in the non-residual trabeculation group (20% vs. 5.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, the PDL and device-related thrombosis at 45 days and 1 year were comparable between the two groups (37% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> = 0.24; 28% vs. 31%, <i>p</i> = 0.84; 2.1% vs. 1.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.50; 6.9% vs. 6.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.69, respectively). The 3-year cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke, all cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were comparable between the two groups (5.7% vs. 5.5%, log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.96; 7.7% vs. 8.9%, log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.34, 31.4% vs. 22.3%, log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.71, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The angiographically detected residual trabeculation rate was 5.6%, and this population had a significantly higher prevalence of PDL at the procedure. However, the presence of residual trabeculation did not contribute to PDL or device-related thrombosis at follow-up or affect the clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 2","pages":"347-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research on the impact of angiographically detected residual trabeculation after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is limited.

Objectives

To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and clinical implications of angiographically detected residual trabeculation after LAAC using the WATCHMAN device.

Methods

We analyzed 1350 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing LAAC using the WATCHMAN device from the OCEAN-LAAC registry, which is a prospective ongoing, multicenter Japanese registry. The inclusion criteria comprised patients who successfully underwent LAAC and whose presence or absence of residual trabeculation can be confirmed using a contrast medium. The clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without angiographically detected residual trabeculation.

Results

Residual trabeculation was angiographically detected in 5.6% (75/1350 patients). At the procedure, the proportion of peri-device leak (PDL) was significantly higher in the residual trabeculation group than in the non-residual trabeculation group (20% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001). However, the PDL and device-related thrombosis at 45 days and 1 year were comparable between the two groups (37% vs. 23%, p = 0.24; 28% vs. 31%, p = 0.84; 2.1% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.50; 6.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.69, respectively). The 3-year cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke, all cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were comparable between the two groups (5.7% vs. 5.5%, log-rank p = 0.96; 7.7% vs. 8.9%, log-rank p = 0.34, 31.4% vs. 22.3%, log-rank p = 0.71, respectively).

Conclusion

The angiographically detected residual trabeculation rate was 5.6%, and this population had a significantly higher prevalence of PDL at the procedure. However, the presence of residual trabeculation did not contribute to PDL or device-related thrombosis at follow-up or affect the clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用WATCHMAN设备关闭左心耳后血管造影检测残余小梁的影响:来自OCEAN-LAAC注册的见解。
背景:关于左心房附件关闭(LAAC)后血管造影检测残余小梁影响的研究有限。目的:探讨使用WATCHMAN装置LAAC后血管造影检测到残余小梁的发生率、特点和临床意义。方法:我们分析了1350例连续的房颤患者,使用来自OCEAN-LAAC注册中心的WATCHMAN装置进行LAAC,这是一个前瞻性的、持续的、多中心的日本注册中心。纳入标准包括成功行LAAC的患者,其残余小梁的存在或不存在可以用造影剂确认。比较有和没有血管造影检测到残余小梁的患者的临床结果。结果:5.6%(75/1350)患者在血管造影检查中发现残余小梁。在手术过程中,残余小梁组的设备周围泄漏(PDL)比例明显高于非残余小梁组(20% vs. 5.1%, p结论:血管造影检测到残余小梁率为5.6%,该人群在手术过程中PDL的患病率明显高于非残余小梁组(20% vs. 5.1%)。然而,在随访中,残余小梁的存在并没有导致PDL或器械相关血栓形成,也没有影响临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Response to the Letter to the Editor "How to Manage Ventricular Arrhythmia Following Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation". Catheter Ablation Improves Ventilatory Efficiency in Atrial Fibrillation-Mediated Cardiomyopathy. Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Presence of Ineffective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Provides Insights Into Hidden Causes and Therapeutic Targets of Nonresponder. Response to Letter to the Editor Concerning the Article "Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions with Prepotentials Mapped Inside Coronary Cusps: When to Go Infra-Valvular?"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1