Patient-reported questionnaires to preoperatively identify high-risk surgical patients.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03560-0
Renske Meijer, David W G Ten Cate, Bart C Bongers, Marta Regis, Hans H C M Savelberg, Gerrit D Slooter, Stef Janssen, Martijn van Hooff, Goof Schep
{"title":"Patient-reported questionnaires to preoperatively identify high-risk surgical patients.","authors":"Renske Meijer, David W G Ten Cate, Bart C Bongers, Marta Regis, Hans H C M Savelberg, Gerrit D Slooter, Stef Janssen, Martijn van Hooff, Goof Schep","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03560-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major surgery. Assessing CRF preoperatively, by measuring peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2peak</sub>) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), is valuable yet not widely available. This study aimed to assess whether questionnaires could be used preoperatively to identify high-risk surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy participants and patients who underwent CPET completed the FitMáx, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), the modified 4-questions DASI (M-DASI-4Q), Veterans-Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ), and Metabolic Equivalents of Task (MET) questionnaire. Questionnaire-VO<sub>2peak</sub> was compared with CPET-VO<sub>2peak</sub>. Overall performance of the questionnaires was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Furthermore, corresponding to the Youden index or pre-specified levels, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 361 participants were included. All questionnaires showed high AUC values to identify high-risk patients, defined on the basis of CPET-VO<sub>2peak</sub> thresholds. FitMáx and VSAQ demonstrated superior results compared to the other questionnaires. Based on the Youden index, the optimal questionnaire-VO<sub>2peak</sub> cut-off values were 20.6, 21.3, and 26.1 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup> for the FitMáx and 16.3, 18.2, and 20.4 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup> for the VSAQ corresponding to the VO<sub>2peak</sub> thresholds 16.0, 18.2 and 24.5 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup> respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to identify high-risk surgical patients preoperatively (defined by the CPET-VO<sub>2peak</sub> thresholds) by the FitMáx and the VSAQ indicates that they could be used to identify high-risk surgical patients. Patients with a poor predicted VO<sub>2peak</sub> ≤ 21.3 and ≤ 18.2 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, respectively for FitMáx and VSAQ, should be referred to formal preoperative (cardiopulmonary) exercise testing.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered as NL-OMON23304 in the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands, retrospectively at 28-04-2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03560-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major surgery. Assessing CRF preoperatively, by measuring peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), is valuable yet not widely available. This study aimed to assess whether questionnaires could be used preoperatively to identify high-risk surgical patients.

Methods: Healthy participants and patients who underwent CPET completed the FitMáx, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), the modified 4-questions DASI (M-DASI-4Q), Veterans-Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ), and Metabolic Equivalents of Task (MET) questionnaire. Questionnaire-VO2peak was compared with CPET-VO2peak. Overall performance of the questionnaires was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Furthermore, corresponding to the Youden index or pre-specified levels, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined.

Results: In total, 361 participants were included. All questionnaires showed high AUC values to identify high-risk patients, defined on the basis of CPET-VO2peak thresholds. FitMáx and VSAQ demonstrated superior results compared to the other questionnaires. Based on the Youden index, the optimal questionnaire-VO2peak cut-off values were 20.6, 21.3, and 26.1 ml·kg-1·min-1 for the FitMáx and 16.3, 18.2, and 20.4 ml·kg-1·min-1 for the VSAQ corresponding to the VO2peak thresholds 16.0, 18.2 and 24.5 ml·kg-1·min-1 respectively.

Conclusion: The ability to identify high-risk surgical patients preoperatively (defined by the CPET-VO2peak thresholds) by the FitMáx and the VSAQ indicates that they could be used to identify high-risk surgical patients. Patients with a poor predicted VO2peak ≤ 21.3 and ≤ 18.2 ml·kg-1·min-1, respectively for FitMáx and VSAQ, should be referred to formal preoperative (cardiopulmonary) exercise testing.

Trial registration: The study was registered as NL-OMON23304 in the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands, retrospectively at 28-04-2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative factors predicting outcomes in patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma referred for curative resection- a single-center 10-year experience. Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study. Comparative effectiveness totally endoscopic thyroidectomy via completely submental tri-hole approach and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy without insufflation. Curative treatment for oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer- results of a prospective multicenter study. New purse-string suture clamp and multi-functional seal cap: a simple intracorporeal circular-stapled oesophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1