Immediate changes in depolarization and repolarization after left bundle branch area pacing and atrioventricular nodal ablation

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of electrocardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.153847
Mert Doğan MD, Uğur Canpolat MD, Cem Çöteli MD, Hikmet Yorgun MD, Kudret Aytemir MD
{"title":"Immediate changes in depolarization and repolarization after left bundle branch area pacing and atrioventricular nodal ablation","authors":"Mert Doğan MD,&nbsp;Uğur Canpolat MD,&nbsp;Cem Çöteli MD,&nbsp;Hikmet Yorgun MD,&nbsp;Kudret Aytemir MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.153847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Malignant arrhythmia due to ventricular depolarization and repolarization alterations after atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation is a known clinical entity. Here, we aimed to demonstrate the ventricular depolarization and repolarization changes in patients who underwent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) and AVN ablation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-center, retrospective preliminary study (<em>n</em> = 10). All patients underwent single-chamber pacemaker implantation with LBBaP before the AVN ablation procedure. Electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters [QRS duration (QRSd), QTc (Fridericia formula), Tp-e, and JT interval] were measured and analyzed before and after the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age of the study population was 67.1 ± 8.88 years, and 70 % of the patients were female. 60 % of the patients had AF, and 40 % of them had atrial tachycardia during the procedures. Eight patients had undergone more than two catheter ablations before the procedure. The QT interval (263.47 ± 26.79 vs. 416.14 ± 36.31 msec) and QRSd (93.3 ± 7.3 vs. 122.32 ± 21.16 msec) were prolonged when the patient's ECG parameters were analyzed. Still, the Tp-Te interval (75.57 ± 18.62 vs. 80.93 ± 17.35 msec) did not change, and the QTc (Fridericia formula) interval (425 ± 29.82 vs. 461.70 ± 35.33 msec) did not show a significant difference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Malignant arrhythmia may occur due to ventricular depolarization and repolarization changes after the AVN ablation procedure. This study showed no significant change in Tp-e and QTc durations previously defined for malignant arrhythmia development. At the same time, JT time, which indicates ventricular repolarization duration, did not show a significant difference. LBBaP is more physiological and safer for patients planning to undergo AVN ablation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 153847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073624003170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Malignant arrhythmia due to ventricular depolarization and repolarization alterations after atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation is a known clinical entity. Here, we aimed to demonstrate the ventricular depolarization and repolarization changes in patients who underwent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) and AVN ablation.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective preliminary study (n = 10). All patients underwent single-chamber pacemaker implantation with LBBaP before the AVN ablation procedure. Electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters [QRS duration (QRSd), QTc (Fridericia formula), Tp-e, and JT interval] were measured and analyzed before and after the procedure.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 67.1 ± 8.88 years, and 70 % of the patients were female. 60 % of the patients had AF, and 40 % of them had atrial tachycardia during the procedures. Eight patients had undergone more than two catheter ablations before the procedure. The QT interval (263.47 ± 26.79 vs. 416.14 ± 36.31 msec) and QRSd (93.3 ± 7.3 vs. 122.32 ± 21.16 msec) were prolonged when the patient's ECG parameters were analyzed. Still, the Tp-Te interval (75.57 ± 18.62 vs. 80.93 ± 17.35 msec) did not change, and the QTc (Fridericia formula) interval (425 ± 29.82 vs. 461.70 ± 35.33 msec) did not show a significant difference.

Conclusion

Malignant arrhythmia may occur due to ventricular depolarization and repolarization changes after the AVN ablation procedure. This study showed no significant change in Tp-e and QTc durations previously defined for malignant arrhythmia development. At the same time, JT time, which indicates ventricular repolarization duration, did not show a significant difference. LBBaP is more physiological and safer for patients planning to undergo AVN ablation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左束支区起搏和房室结消融后去极化和复极化的即时变化。
背景:房室结(AVN)消融后心室去极化和复极化改变引起的恶性心律失常是一个已知的临床实体。在这里,我们的目的是证明左束分支区域起搏(LBBaP)和AVN消融患者心室去极化和复极化的变化。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性初步研究(n = 10)。所有患者在AVN消融前均行单室起搏器植入LBBaP。测量并分析术前、术后心电图参数[QRS持续时间(QRSd)、QTc (Fridericia公式)、Tp-e、JT间期]。结果:研究人群平均年龄为67.1±8.88岁,女性占70%。在治疗过程中,60%的患者有房颤,40%的患者有房性心动过速。8名患者在手术前接受了两次以上的导管消融。分析心电图参数时QT间期(263.47±26.79比416.14±36.31 msec)延长,QRSd(93.3±7.3比122.32±21.16 msec)延长。Tp-Te区间(75.57±18.62 vs. 80.93±17.35 msec)没有变化,QTc (Fridericia公式)区间(425±29.82 vs. 461.70±35.33 msec)无显著差异。结论:AVN消融后室性去极化和复极化改变可导致恶性心律失常。该研究显示,先前定义为恶性心律失常发展的Tp-e和QTc持续时间没有显著变化。与此同时,反映心室复极持续时间的JT时间无显著差异。对于计划行AVN消融的患者,LBBaP更具生理性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of electrocardiology
Journal of electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
A dragon in a barn Ventricular preexcitation and narrow QRS tachycardia. What is the diagnosis? Expect the unexpected Challenges in localisation of culprit artery in STEMI A practical review of generative AI in cardiac electrophysiology medical education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1