[Ethical standards for research involving persons with mental disabilities pursuant to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a proposalPrincípios éticos para pesquisas com pessoas com deficiência intelectual de acordo com a Convenção sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência: uma proposta].

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2024.126
Sarah Carracedo, Bernardo Aguilera, Renato Constantino
{"title":"[Ethical standards for research involving persons with mental disabilities pursuant to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a proposalPrincípios éticos para pesquisas com pessoas com deficiência intelectual de acordo com a Convenção sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência: uma proposta].","authors":"Sarah Carracedo, Bernardo Aguilera, Renato Constantino","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2024.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>International ethical standards for research involving persons who have diminished decision-making capacity allow for delegation of the decision to participate in research to a representative who can act as a surrogate decision-maker. However, this approach has been questioned by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), according to which all persons with disabilities, regardless of their mental or neurological condition, always have universal legal capacity to make decisions. The incompatibility between ethical standards and the CRPD is clear and impacts the conduct of research involving people with mental disabilities, which is essential for the improvement of their health and well-being. This article advances a proposal that seeks to reconcile the CRPD with ethical standards for informed consent processes in research and provides practical recommendations, especially for Latin American countries that still face challenges in implementing the CRPD in the research field.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 ","pages":"e126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International ethical standards for research involving persons who have diminished decision-making capacity allow for delegation of the decision to participate in research to a representative who can act as a surrogate decision-maker. However, this approach has been questioned by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), according to which all persons with disabilities, regardless of their mental or neurological condition, always have universal legal capacity to make decisions. The incompatibility between ethical standards and the CRPD is clear and impacts the conduct of research involving people with mental disabilities, which is essential for the improvement of their health and well-being. This article advances a proposal that seeks to reconcile the CRPD with ethical standards for informed consent processes in research and provides practical recommendations, especially for Latin American countries that still face challenges in implementing the CRPD in the research field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[根据《残疾人权利公约》涉及智障人士的研究的伦理标准:根据《残疾人权利公约》涉及智障人士的研究的伦理原则:一项建议]。
涉及决策能力下降的人的研究的国际伦理标准允许将参与研究的决定委托给可以作为代理决策者的代表。然而,这种做法受到了《残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)的质疑,根据该公约,所有残疾人,无论其精神或神经状况如何,始终具有普遍的法律决策能力。道德标准与《残疾人权利公约》之间的不相容是显而易见的,并影响到涉及精神残疾者的研究的开展,而这对改善他们的健康和福祉至关重要。本文提出了一项建议,旨在协调CRPD与研究中知情同意过程的伦理标准,并为在研究领域实施CRPD仍面临挑战的拉丁美洲国家提供实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Analysis of the surveillance system for adverse events following Immunization (AEFI) related to COVID-19 vaccines in Colombia, 2021-2023Análise do sistema de vigilância de ESAVI por vacinas contra a COVID-19 na Colômbia, 2021-2023]. [Knowledge, practices, and human seroprevalence of brucellosis in the central dairy-producing area of Cochabamba, BoliviaConhecimentos, práticas e soroprevalência humana de brucelose na área central de produção de laticínios de Cochabamba, Bolívia]. Point prevalence survey of antibiotics in a pediatric tertiary hospital in the Republic of Panama. [Controlling cystic echinococcosis: outlook in the 21st centuryControle da equinococose/hidatidose cística: perspectivas no século XXI]. [Pharmacovigilance of COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil: Actions Taken, Lessons Learned, and Next StepsFarmacovigilancia de las vacunas contra la COVID-19 en Brasil: medidas adoptadas, enseñanzas extraídas y próximos pasos].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1