Validity and reliability study of the Turkish adaptation of the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.42811
Kerim Kaan Gokustun, Nurcan Yabanci Ayhan
{"title":"Validity and reliability study of the Turkish adaptation of the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.","authors":"Kerim Kaan Gokustun, Nurcan Yabanci Ayhan","doi":"10.34172/hpp.42811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ) in university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 394 undergraduate students at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University. The study included individuals who volunteered to participate, were at least 18 years old, and did not have any severe psychological issues. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses of the scale were conducted by dividing the data set into two groups. Cronbach's α coefficient was analyzed and a test-retest was conducted with 94 students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was determined that the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire had 2 factors (acceptance and willingness). The fit values of the scale were found to be CMIN/df=2.26; GFI=0.92; AGFI=0.87; CFI=0.85; RMSEA=0.08. The acceptance, willingness subscales and total Cronbach α coefficients of the scale were 0.761, 0.716 and 0.761, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were 0.84, 0.81 and 0.80 for acceptance, willingness and total scale score, respectively. Statistically significant negative correlations were found between the 'acceptance', 'willingness' subscale and total DEBQ, FCQ-T scores, subscale scores and mYFAS 2.0 symptom count (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FAAQ was found to have a two-factor structure and the fit values were found to be within the acceptable range. The age range for university students is considered to be that of adults, and this scale can also be applied to adults in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"14 3","pages":"268-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.42811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ) in university students.

Methods: The study included 394 undergraduate students at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University. The study included individuals who volunteered to participate, were at least 18 years old, and did not have any severe psychological issues. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses of the scale were conducted by dividing the data set into two groups. Cronbach's α coefficient was analyzed and a test-retest was conducted with 94 students.

Results: It was determined that the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire had 2 factors (acceptance and willingness). The fit values of the scale were found to be CMIN/df=2.26; GFI=0.92; AGFI=0.87; CFI=0.85; RMSEA=0.08. The acceptance, willingness subscales and total Cronbach α coefficients of the scale were 0.761, 0.716 and 0.761, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were 0.84, 0.81 and 0.80 for acceptance, willingness and total scale score, respectively. Statistically significant negative correlations were found between the 'acceptance', 'willingness' subscale and total DEBQ, FCQ-T scores, subscale scores and mYFAS 2.0 symptom count (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The FAAQ was found to have a two-factor structure and the fit values were found to be within the acceptable range. The age range for university students is considered to be that of adults, and this scale can also be applied to adults in general.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其人对食物渴望接受与行动问卷的改写效度与信度研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估大学生渴望食物接受与行动问卷(FAAQ)的效度和信度。方法:研究对象为安卡拉Yıldırım Beyazıt大学394名本科生。该研究包括自愿参加的个人,年龄至少18岁,没有任何严重的心理问题。将数据集分为两组,对量表进行解释性和验证性因素分析。对94名学生进行Cronbach’s α系数分析和重测。结果:确定食物渴望接受与行动问卷包含2个因素(接受与意愿)。量表的拟合值为CMIN/df=2.26;GFI = 0.92;AGFI = 0.87;CFI = 0.85;RMSEA = 0.08。量表的接受度、意愿分量表和总Cronbach α系数分别为0.761、0.716和0.761。接受度、意愿和总量表得分的类内相关系数(ICC)分别为0.84、0.81和0.80。“接受”、“意愿”分量表与DEBQ总分、FCQ-T评分、分量表得分和mYFAS 2.0症状计数呈显著负相关(p)。结论:FAAQ具有双因素结构,拟合值在可接受范围内。大学生的年龄范围被认为是成年人的年龄范围,这个尺度也可以适用于一般的成年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing universal considerations in infant mortality across the globe: A descriptive observational study of sudden infant death syndrome knowledge and reduction coverage on YouTube. Blood pressure management protocol based on transtheoretical model effectiveness on self- care: A systematic review. Effects of propolis supplementation on prooxidant-antioxidant balance, oxidative stress biomarkers, and body composition in obese patients with NAFLD: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Perspectives on barriers to traditional sources of sexual and reproductive health information and services: Are mHealth technologies the answer? Predictors of dropping out from a home tele-exercise programme: A cohort study derived from a randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1