User preference and patient benefits of a novel energy storing and return foot: A randomized, cross-over clinical trial.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000415
Pawel Maciejasz, Tymoteusz Budny, Michael Sauer, Marina Umari, Jürgen Korber, Jennifer Ernst, Bjoern Altenburg, Andreas Hahn, Frank Braatz
{"title":"User preference and patient benefits of a novel energy storing and return foot: A randomized, cross-over clinical trial.","authors":"Pawel Maciejasz, Tymoteusz Budny, Michael Sauer, Marina Umari, Jürgen Korber, Jennifer Ernst, Bjoern Altenburg, Andreas Hahn, Frank Braatz","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Energy storing and return (ESAR) prosthetic feet often provide high energy return at the cost of increased foot height, compromised appearance, and reduced flexibility. An ESAR foot, Ottobock Evanto, with a novel compact design has been introduced (novel foot).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize user preference and benefits of a novel foot compared with the subject's previously worn (everyday foot) and comparator foot, Össur Pro-Flex XC.Study Design:Multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, cross-over trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05628064).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transtibial amputees using ESAR feet were eligible. Outcome measures included perceived mobility, the extent of meeting amputees' needs, pain intensity, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, Activities-specific Balance Confidence, pain interference, foot preference, and walking experience. The first 3 measures with the novel foot vs. the everyday and comparator feet were used for primary objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 20 participants were analyzed. For all primary outcomes, improved scores while wearing the novel foot were obtained. The change in perceived mobility vs. the everyday foot score was highly significant (P = 0.0007). The novel foot was the most preferred foot overall (55% participants) and for many activities, e.g., walking on inclines (85%) and over uneven terrain (70%). Participants confirmed that the novel foot made walking up slopes easier (95%), standing more flexible (85%), and heel strike more comfortable (85%) vs. their everyday feet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel foot offers advantages compared with the tested feet, including making walking on uneven terrain and slopes easier and more comfortable heel strike. Activities in which the novel foot would perform worse than the other feet have not been reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Energy storing and return (ESAR) prosthetic feet often provide high energy return at the cost of increased foot height, compromised appearance, and reduced flexibility. An ESAR foot, Ottobock Evanto, with a novel compact design has been introduced (novel foot).

Objective: To characterize user preference and benefits of a novel foot compared with the subject's previously worn (everyday foot) and comparator foot, Össur Pro-Flex XC.Study Design:Multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, cross-over trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05628064).

Methods: Transtibial amputees using ESAR feet were eligible. Outcome measures included perceived mobility, the extent of meeting amputees' needs, pain intensity, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, Activities-specific Balance Confidence, pain interference, foot preference, and walking experience. The first 3 measures with the novel foot vs. the everyday and comparator feet were used for primary objectives.

Results: Data from 20 participants were analyzed. For all primary outcomes, improved scores while wearing the novel foot were obtained. The change in perceived mobility vs. the everyday foot score was highly significant (P = 0.0007). The novel foot was the most preferred foot overall (55% participants) and for many activities, e.g., walking on inclines (85%) and over uneven terrain (70%). Participants confirmed that the novel foot made walking up slopes easier (95%), standing more flexible (85%), and heel strike more comfortable (85%) vs. their everyday feet.

Conclusions: The novel foot offers advantages compared with the tested feet, including making walking on uneven terrain and slopes easier and more comfortable heel strike. Activities in which the novel foot would perform worse than the other feet have not been reported.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型能量储存和返回足的用户偏好和患者益处:一项随机交叉临床试验。
背景:能量储存和返回(ESAR)假肢脚通常提供高能量返回,代价是脚的高度增加,外观受损,灵活性降低。一种ESAR脚,Ottobock Evanto,具有新颖的紧凑设计(新颖脚)。目的:与受试者以前穿的(日常脚)和比较脚Össur Pro-Flex XC相比,表征用户偏好和新脚的好处。研究设计:多中心、随机、非盲、交叉试验(ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05628064)。方法:经胫部截肢患者采用ESAR足。结果测量包括感知的活动能力、满足截肢者需求的程度、疼痛强度、EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level、特定活动平衡信心、疼痛干扰、足部偏好和步行体验。新足与日常足和比较足的前3个测量用于主要目标。结果:分析了20名参与者的数据。在所有主要结果中,佩戴新型足部后得分均有所提高。感知活动能力与日常足部评分的变化非常显著(P = 0.0007)。在许多活动中,例如在斜坡上行走(85%)和在不平坦的地形上行走(70%),新颖的脚是最受欢迎的脚(55%的参与者)。参与者证实,与他们日常的脚相比,这种新脚让他们在斜坡上行走更容易(95%),站立更灵活(85%),脚跟撞击更舒适(85%)。结论:与已测试的脚相比,新型脚具有优势,包括在不平坦的地形和斜坡上行走更容易,脚跟撞击更舒适。在一些活动中,这只新脚的表现会比其他脚差,目前还没有相关报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors. Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses on jump landing performance: A systematic review. Which factors may influence medium-term quality of life of patients with lower-limb loss? A systematic review of the literature. What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis. A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1