Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire (AVVQ) in Patients With Varicose Veins of Lower Extremity: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Chen Wang, Wenjing Yang, Xiaojun Shen, Jing Xu, Xia Wang, Chao Ji, Siwen Hu
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire (AVVQ) in Patients With Varicose Veins of Lower Extremity: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Chen Wang, Wenjing Yang, Xiaojun Shen, Jing Xu, Xia Wang, Chao Ji, Siwen Hu","doi":"10.1002/nur.22431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Varicose veins in the lower extremities significantly impairs patients' quality of life, highlighting the importance of targeted quality of life assessments for specific diseases. The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) was specifically designed to assess the impact of lower extremity varicose veins on quality of life. This study comprised two phases: in the first phase, the AVVQ was translated and culturally adapted, and the second phase was an evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of AVVQ in 328 patients with varicose veins of lower extremities. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the Chinese AVVQ comprises 13 items distributed across four dimensions, accounting for a total variance of 61.74%, with a Cronbach's α of 0.745 and a content validity index of 0.908. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between the AVVQ scores and the SF-36. In addition, the difference in AVVQ scores by CEAP classification was statistically significant. These findings affirmed the Chinese version of the AVVQ as both reliable and valid, making it a valid tool for evaluating the quality of life in Chinese patients with varicose veins and applicable across various international contexts and diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Varicose veins in the lower extremities significantly impairs patients' quality of life, highlighting the importance of targeted quality of life assessments for specific diseases. The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) was specifically designed to assess the impact of lower extremity varicose veins on quality of life. This study comprised two phases: in the first phase, the AVVQ was translated and culturally adapted, and the second phase was an evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of AVVQ in 328 patients with varicose veins of lower extremities. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the Chinese AVVQ comprises 13 items distributed across four dimensions, accounting for a total variance of 61.74%, with a Cronbach's α of 0.745 and a content validity index of 0.908. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between the AVVQ scores and the SF-36. In addition, the difference in AVVQ scores by CEAP classification was statistically significant. These findings affirmed the Chinese version of the AVVQ as both reliable and valid, making it a valid tool for evaluating the quality of life in Chinese patients with varicose veins and applicable across various international contexts and diverse patient populations.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.