Factors influencing nurses and nursing students' attitudes towards vaccinations: A cross-sectional study.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104963
Jeremia Keisala, Erika Jarva, Dania Comparcini, Valentina Simonetti, Giancarlo Cicolini, John Unsworth, Marco Tomietto, Kristina Mikkonen
{"title":"Factors influencing nurses and nursing students' attitudes towards vaccinations: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jeremia Keisala, Erika Jarva, Dania Comparcini, Valentina Simonetti, Giancarlo Cicolini, John Unsworth, Marco Tomietto, Kristina Mikkonen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccination hesitancy remains the main obstacle to improving vaccination coverage. Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals is essential. It is crucial to study the vaccination attitudes of healthcare professionals as they significantly influence the vaccination attitudes and behaviour of the rest of the population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the attitudes of Finnish nurses and nursing students towards COVID-19 and Influenza vaccination and explain what factors influence these attitudes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>A total of 1353 nurses from five hospital organisations and 580 nursing students from eight Universities of Applied Sciences participated in the survey. Participants were invited to complete the questionnaire through Webropol between March and September 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To collect data anonymously, a self-reported web-based questionnaire combining the Vaccination Attitude Examination (VAX) scale and Bergen's Social Media Addiction (BSMA) scale was used. K-means cluster analysis was performed to describe vaccination attitude profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four distinct vaccination attitude profiles were identified: Profile A - Confident Pro-Vaccine (n = 605) exhibited low hesitancy, with high confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness; Profile B - Cautiously Pro-Vaccine (n = 764) showed moderate hesitancy, mainly concerned about unforeseen future effects; Profile C - Hesitant with Mistrust (n = 405) expressed high hesitancy, with significant worries about vaccine safety and mistrust in health authorities; and Profile D - Strongly Vaccine-Hesitant (n = 159) demonstrated very high hesitancy, marked by strong beliefs in potential long-term negative effects of vaccination. Significant differences in VAX-scale mean scores were found between the profiles, ranging from 1.27 for Profile A to 6.65 for Profile D. Overall, nursing students were more hesitant than practising nurses, with students being overrepresented in the more hesitant profiles. Clinical training in a COVID-19 unit was associated with more favourable vaccination attitudes among nursing students. The uptake of the full series of COVID-19 and annual Influenza vaccines was generally high in the sample (90.8 % and 87 %, respectively). However, a clear pattern between specific social media use and vaccination attitudes was not found. Major concerns related to vaccine hesitancy focused on the uncertainty of vaccines' long-term effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the complex nature of vaccination hesitancy among nurses and nursing students. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address underlying concerns and promote vaccine acceptance within this demographic. In future research, it would be essential to gather more in-depth knowledge, particularly regarding nursing students' attitudes towards vaccination and the factors influencing them.</p>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"162 ","pages":"104963"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104963","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaccination hesitancy remains the main obstacle to improving vaccination coverage. Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals is essential. It is crucial to study the vaccination attitudes of healthcare professionals as they significantly influence the vaccination attitudes and behaviour of the rest of the population.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the attitudes of Finnish nurses and nursing students towards COVID-19 and Influenza vaccination and explain what factors influence these attitudes.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting and participants: A total of 1353 nurses from five hospital organisations and 580 nursing students from eight Universities of Applied Sciences participated in the survey. Participants were invited to complete the questionnaire through Webropol between March and September 2023.

Methods: To collect data anonymously, a self-reported web-based questionnaire combining the Vaccination Attitude Examination (VAX) scale and Bergen's Social Media Addiction (BSMA) scale was used. K-means cluster analysis was performed to describe vaccination attitude profiles.

Results: Four distinct vaccination attitude profiles were identified: Profile A - Confident Pro-Vaccine (n = 605) exhibited low hesitancy, with high confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness; Profile B - Cautiously Pro-Vaccine (n = 764) showed moderate hesitancy, mainly concerned about unforeseen future effects; Profile C - Hesitant with Mistrust (n = 405) expressed high hesitancy, with significant worries about vaccine safety and mistrust in health authorities; and Profile D - Strongly Vaccine-Hesitant (n = 159) demonstrated very high hesitancy, marked by strong beliefs in potential long-term negative effects of vaccination. Significant differences in VAX-scale mean scores were found between the profiles, ranging from 1.27 for Profile A to 6.65 for Profile D. Overall, nursing students were more hesitant than practising nurses, with students being overrepresented in the more hesitant profiles. Clinical training in a COVID-19 unit was associated with more favourable vaccination attitudes among nursing students. The uptake of the full series of COVID-19 and annual Influenza vaccines was generally high in the sample (90.8 % and 87 %, respectively). However, a clear pattern between specific social media use and vaccination attitudes was not found. Major concerns related to vaccine hesitancy focused on the uncertainty of vaccines' long-term effects.

Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the complex nature of vaccination hesitancy among nurses and nursing students. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address underlying concerns and promote vaccine acceptance within this demographic. In future research, it would be essential to gather more in-depth knowledge, particularly regarding nursing students' attitudes towards vaccination and the factors influencing them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士及护生对疫苗接种态度的影响因素:横断面研究。
背景:疫苗接种犹豫不决仍然是提高疫苗接种覆盖率的主要障碍。卫生保健专业人员的流感和COVID-19疫苗接种覆盖率至关重要。研究卫生保健专业人员的疫苗接种态度至关重要,因为他们对其他人口的疫苗接种态度和行为有重大影响。目的:本研究旨在描述芬兰护士和护生对COVID-19和流感疫苗接种的态度,并解释影响这些态度的因素。设计:横断面研究。调查地点及对象:共有来自五间医院机构的1353名护士及来自八所应用科技大学的580名护生参与调查。参与者被邀请在2023年3月至9月期间通过Webropol完成问卷调查。方法:采用基于网络的疫苗接种态度调查(VAX)量表和卑尔根社交媒体成瘾(BSMA)量表相结合的自述问卷,采用匿名方式收集数据。采用k -均值聚类分析描述疫苗接种态度概况。结果:确定了四种不同的疫苗接种态度:A型-自信的支持疫苗(n = 605)表现出低犹豫,对疫苗的安全性和有效性有很高的信心;谱B -谨慎支持疫苗(n = 764)表现出中度犹豫,主要担心不可预见的未来影响;特征C -犹豫与不信任(n = 405)表示高度犹豫,对疫苗安全和卫生当局的不信任有重大担忧;特征图D -强烈的疫苗犹豫(n = 159)表现出非常高的犹豫,表现为对疫苗接种潜在的长期负面影响的强烈信念。vax量表的平均得分在各概况之间存在显着差异,从概况A的1.27到概况d的6.65不等。总体而言,护生比执业护士更犹豫,学生在更犹豫的概况中被过度代表。在COVID-19单位的临床培训与护理学生中更有利的疫苗接种态度相关。样本中COVID-19全系列疫苗和年度流感疫苗的接种率普遍较高(分别为90.8%和87%)。然而,没有发现特定社交媒体使用与疫苗接种态度之间的明确模式。与疫苗犹豫有关的主要关切集中在疫苗长期效果的不确定性上。结论:本研究对护士和护生疫苗接种犹豫的复杂性提供了有价值的见解。这些发现强调有必要采取有针对性的干预措施,以解决潜在的问题并促进这一人群对疫苗的接受。在未来的研究中,有必要收集更深入的知识,特别是关于护生对疫苗接种的态度及其影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
Think local, write global: Writing peer-reviewed research papers for an international audience. Comment on Liu et al. (2024) 'Patient preferences and willingness to pay for central venous access devices in breast cancer: A multicenter discrete choice experiment' Comment on Fajarini et al. (2024) 'Effects of advanced practice nurses on health-care costs, quality of care, and patient well-being: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'. Evaluating quick return restrictions on sickness absence in healthcare employees: A difference-in-differences study. 'Entanglement of nursing care': A theoretical proposition to understand the complexity of nursing work and division of labour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1