Exercise into Pain in Chronic Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 6-Month Follow-Up.

IF 1.3 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJSM.S483272
Claudia Cavaggion, Alejandro Luque-Suarez, Lennard Voogt, Birgit Juul-Kristensen, Guy Wollants, Lucas Beke, Erik Fransen, Filip Struyf
{"title":"Exercise into Pain in Chronic Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 6-Month Follow-Up.","authors":"Claudia Cavaggion, Alejandro Luque-Suarez, Lennard Voogt, Birgit Juul-Kristensen, Guy Wollants, Lucas Beke, Erik Fransen, Filip Struyf","doi":"10.2147/OAJSM.S483272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercise therapy is the first-line treatment in rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP), and diverse types of exercise seem effective. However, it is not still clear if painful exercise should be allowed or avoided during exercises. The objective of this study was to investigate if exercise into pain is more effective than no pain in RCRSP.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a physiotherapy clinic in Belgium. Forty-three participants with chronic RCRSP were randomly allocated to G1 (exercising into pain) or G2 (exercising without pain) in a 12-week intervention with 6-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI); secondary outcomes were pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, fear of pain, quality of life, strength, and range of motion. Outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), after 9 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3) from the first session and analysed with linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No between-group difference in SPADI (time-by-group interaction, p = 0.25) up to 6 months was found, with mean difference (G1-G2) at T1 = 5.78 (CI95%: -3.43,14.59; p = 0.33), at T2 = 0.93 (CI95%: -7.20,9.05; p = 0.82), at T3 = 4.15 (CI95%: -2.61,10.92; p = 0.33). No between-group differences were found for any other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pain provocation seems not to be necessary in RCRSP for achieving successful treatment effect in pain and disability reduction, fear-related beliefs, and quality of life up to 6 months.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04553289.</p>","PeriodicalId":51644,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"181-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S483272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Exercise therapy is the first-line treatment in rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP), and diverse types of exercise seem effective. However, it is not still clear if painful exercise should be allowed or avoided during exercises. The objective of this study was to investigate if exercise into pain is more effective than no pain in RCRSP.

Patients and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a physiotherapy clinic in Belgium. Forty-three participants with chronic RCRSP were randomly allocated to G1 (exercising into pain) or G2 (exercising without pain) in a 12-week intervention with 6-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI); secondary outcomes were pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, fear of pain, quality of life, strength, and range of motion. Outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), after 9 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3) from the first session and analysed with linear mixed models.

Results: No between-group difference in SPADI (time-by-group interaction, p = 0.25) up to 6 months was found, with mean difference (G1-G2) at T1 = 5.78 (CI95%: -3.43,14.59; p = 0.33), at T2 = 0.93 (CI95%: -7.20,9.05; p = 0.82), at T3 = 4.15 (CI95%: -2.61,10.92; p = 0.33). No between-group differences were found for any other outcomes.

Conclusion: Pain provocation seems not to be necessary in RCRSP for achieving successful treatment effect in pain and disability reduction, fear-related beliefs, and quality of life up to 6 months.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04553289.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动对慢性肩袖相关肩痛的影响:一项6个月随访的随机对照试验。
目的:运动疗法是肩袖相关性肩痛(RCRSP)的一线治疗方法,多种类型的运动似乎都是有效的。然而,目前还不清楚在运动过程中是否应该允许或避免痛苦的运动。本研究的目的是调查在RCRSP中,运动后疼痛是否比不疼痛更有效。患者和方法:在比利时的一家理疗诊所进行了随机对照试验。43名慢性RCRSP患者在为期12周的干预和6个月的随访中被随机分配到G1(运动到疼痛)或G2(运动无疼痛)。主要终点是肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI);次要结局是疼痛强度、恐惧回避信念、对疼痛的恐惧、生活质量、力量和活动范围。在基线(T0)、第一次治疗后9周(T1)、12周(T2)和6个月(T3)测量结果,并使用线性混合模型进行分析。结果:6个月SPADI组间无差异(组间相互作用,p = 0.25), T1 = 5.78时平均差异(G1-G2) (CI95%: -3.43,14.59;p = 0.33), T2 = 0.93 (CI95%: -7.20,9.05;p = 0.82), T3 = 4.15 (CI95%: -2.61,10.92;P = 0.33)。其他结果没有发现组间差异。结论:在RCRSP中,疼痛诱发似乎不是实现疼痛和残疾减轻、恐惧相关信念和6个月生活质量成功治疗效果的必要条件。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04553289。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Objective Neurophysiological Measures of Cognitive Performance in Elite Ice Hockey Players. Yoga Practice as a Potential Sarcopenia Prevention Strategy in Indonesian Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Quadriceps Muscle Geometry and Strength Throughout Maturation in National-Level Male Soccer Players: A Cross-Sectional Study [Letter]. Short-Term Intermittent Normobaric Hypoxia Combined with Light Exercise Improves Acclimatization of Cardiorespiratory Function in Inactive Adults. Microbial Champions: The Influence of Gut Microbiota on Athletic Performance via the Gut-Brain Axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1