The Role of CD56, HBME-1, and CK19 Immunohistochemical Markers in the differential Diagnosing of Thyroid Neoplasms.

Abilash Sasidharannair Chandrakumari, Shree Lakshmi Devi Singaravelu, Pammy Sinha
{"title":"The Role of CD56, HBME-1, and CK19 Immunohistochemical Markers in the differential Diagnosing of Thyroid Neoplasms.","authors":"Abilash Sasidharannair Chandrakumari, Shree Lakshmi Devi Singaravelu, Pammy Sinha","doi":"10.60787/nmj-v65i3.509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of thyroid neoplasms is steadily increasing due to the widespread use of sensitive diagnostic techniques. While histopathologic evaluation using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining is considered the \"gold standard,\" it often faces challenges due to morphological overlap between benign and malignant follicular patterned lesions. This led to diagnostic uncertainties, underscoring the need for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a valuable adjunct. This study aims to evaluate the expression of IHC markers, Hector Battifora Mesothelial Cell-1 (HBME-1), Cluster of Differentiate (CD56 also known as Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule) and Cytokeratin-19 (CK19), in follicular patterned neoplasms of thyroid to aid in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid neoplasms.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study was a descriptive analysis and it included 60 thyroidectomy specimens diagnosed as neoplastic by histopathology were studied after satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The IHC results were interpreted semi-quantitatively. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test and Fisher's-exact tests. P-value of <0.05 was considered as significant. Sensitivity and specificity for each marker and their combination in diagnosis were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the sixty cases, 31.67% were benign neoplasms, and 68.33% were malignant. Loss of CD56 expression was noted in 75.68% of malignant cases. The specificity of CD56, HBME-1, and CK19 in identifying malignant neoplasms was 84.21%, 84.21%, and 89.47%, respectively. The accuracy of CD56 and CK19 in diagnosing follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) from follicular adenoma (FA) was 79.31% and 93.10%, respectively. The specificity of CK19 in distinguishing FVPTC from FA was 89.47%. The specificity of CD56, CK19, and HBME-1 in diagnosing follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) from FA was 84.21%, 85%, and 84.21%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the diagnostic utility of CD56, CK19, and HBME-1 in thyroid neoplasms incorporating these markers into routine diagnostic panels can significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of thyroid malignancy assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":"65 5","pages":"716-724"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60787/nmj-v65i3.509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of thyroid neoplasms is steadily increasing due to the widespread use of sensitive diagnostic techniques. While histopathologic evaluation using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining is considered the "gold standard," it often faces challenges due to morphological overlap between benign and malignant follicular patterned lesions. This led to diagnostic uncertainties, underscoring the need for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a valuable adjunct. This study aims to evaluate the expression of IHC markers, Hector Battifora Mesothelial Cell-1 (HBME-1), Cluster of Differentiate (CD56 also known as Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule) and Cytokeratin-19 (CK19), in follicular patterned neoplasms of thyroid to aid in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid neoplasms.

Methodology: The study was a descriptive analysis and it included 60 thyroidectomy specimens diagnosed as neoplastic by histopathology were studied after satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The IHC results were interpreted semi-quantitatively. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test and Fisher's-exact tests. P-value of <0.05 was considered as significant. Sensitivity and specificity for each marker and their combination in diagnosis were calculated.

Results: Among the sixty cases, 31.67% were benign neoplasms, and 68.33% were malignant. Loss of CD56 expression was noted in 75.68% of malignant cases. The specificity of CD56, HBME-1, and CK19 in identifying malignant neoplasms was 84.21%, 84.21%, and 89.47%, respectively. The accuracy of CD56 and CK19 in diagnosing follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) from follicular adenoma (FA) was 79.31% and 93.10%, respectively. The specificity of CK19 in distinguishing FVPTC from FA was 89.47%. The specificity of CD56, CK19, and HBME-1 in diagnosing follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) from FA was 84.21%, 85%, and 84.21%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the diagnostic utility of CD56, CK19, and HBME-1 in thyroid neoplasms incorporating these markers into routine diagnostic panels can significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of thyroid malignancy assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CD56、HBME-1和CK19免疫组化标志物在甲状腺肿瘤鉴别诊断中的作用
背景:由于敏感诊断技术的广泛应用,甲状腺肿瘤的诊断率正在稳步上升。虽然使用苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的组织病理学评估被认为是“金标准”,但由于良性和恶性滤泡型病变之间的形态学重叠,它经常面临挑战。这导致诊断的不确定性,强调需要免疫组织化学(IHC)作为有价值的辅助手段。本研究旨在评估甲状腺滤泡型肿瘤中IHC标志物Hector Battifora Mesothelial Cell-1 (HBME-1)、CD56 (Cluster of differentiation,又称神经细胞粘附分子)和细胞角蛋白19 (cytokerprotein -19, CK19)的表达,以帮助甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断。方法:本研究为描述性分析,纳入60例经组织病理学诊断为肿瘤的甲状腺切除术标本,满足纳入和排除标准后进行研究。免疫组化结果半定量解释。统计学分析采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。结果p值:60例中,良性肿瘤占31.67%,恶性肿瘤占68.33%。75.68%的恶性病例中CD56表达缺失。CD56、HBME-1和CK19对恶性肿瘤的特异性分别为84.21%、84.21%和89.47%。CD56和CK19对滤泡腺瘤(FA)中滤泡变异性甲状腺乳头状癌(FVPTC)的诊断准确率分别为79.31%和93.10%。CK19区分FVPTC和FA的特异性为89.47%。CD56、CK19和HBME-1在FA中诊断滤泡性甲状腺癌(FTC)的特异性分别为84.21%、85%和84.21%。结论:我们的研究强调了CD56、CK19和HBME-1在甲状腺肿瘤诊断中的应用,将这些标志物纳入常规诊断小组可以显著提高甲状腺恶性肿瘤评估的准确性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Descending Colon with Regional Lymph Node Involvement Presenting in a Young Adult Nigerian Male: A Case Report. Sero-prevalence of hepatitis B and C and HIV among students at the Federal University of Health Sciences, Azare. An evaluation of Asthma control using the Asthma control test in patients at the University Hospital, Agadir, Morocco. Analysis of HAM-D Scores on Cognitive Functions and Heart Rate Variability in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccine Knowledge, Uptake, and Factors Influencing its Uptake Among Medical Students at the University of Jos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1