Peripheral perfusion response to semiorthostatic stress: a simple method for assessing autonomic dysfunction in sepsis?

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240090-en
Lilian Barth Guimarães, César Maistro Guimarães, Hipólito Carraro Junior, Jamil Assreuy Filho, Igor Alexandre Côrtes de Menezes
{"title":"Peripheral perfusion response to semiorthostatic stress: a simple method for assessing autonomic dysfunction in sepsis?","authors":"Lilian Barth Guimarães, César Maistro Guimarães, Hipólito Carraro Junior, Jamil Assreuy Filho, Igor Alexandre Côrtes de Menezes","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240090-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether the perfusion index response to semiorthostatic stress can be used to monitor the sympathetic-vascular response in sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups were studied: Group A (30 healthy patients), Group B (30 critically ill patients without sepsis), and Group C (92 septic patients). The patients underwent a semiorthostatic stress test (head elevation from 0 to 60 degrees), and hemodynamics, perfusion index values and cardiac ultrasound data were evaluated. SOFA scores were also evaluated in septic patients, comparing those with increased and decreased perfusion indices after the test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the test, Group A presented significant reductions in stroke volume (p < 0.01) and the cardiac index (p < 0.05), with increases in heart rate (p < 0.05) and mean arterial pressure (p < 0.001). These responses were not observed in Groups B and C. In the individual analysis of Group A, there was a decrease in the perfusion index (p < 0,001), whereas in Groups B and C, the response was heterogeneous. Additionally, septic patients who had a reduced perfusion index after the test had a significant decrease in the SOFA score at 72 hours compared with the group with an increased perfusion index (p < 0.05). However, the delta-SOFA score did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perfusion index response to semiorthostatic stress in sepsis patients is a simple and inexpensive method that can be used to detect the sympathetic-microvascular response at the bedside and appears to have prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"36 ","pages":"e20240090en"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240090-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the perfusion index response to semiorthostatic stress can be used to monitor the sympathetic-vascular response in sepsis patients.

Methods: Three groups were studied: Group A (30 healthy patients), Group B (30 critically ill patients without sepsis), and Group C (92 septic patients). The patients underwent a semiorthostatic stress test (head elevation from 0 to 60 degrees), and hemodynamics, perfusion index values and cardiac ultrasound data were evaluated. SOFA scores were also evaluated in septic patients, comparing those with increased and decreased perfusion indices after the test.

Results: After the test, Group A presented significant reductions in stroke volume (p < 0.01) and the cardiac index (p < 0.05), with increases in heart rate (p < 0.05) and mean arterial pressure (p < 0.001). These responses were not observed in Groups B and C. In the individual analysis of Group A, there was a decrease in the perfusion index (p < 0,001), whereas in Groups B and C, the response was heterogeneous. Additionally, septic patients who had a reduced perfusion index after the test had a significant decrease in the SOFA score at 72 hours compared with the group with an increased perfusion index (p < 0.05). However, the delta-SOFA score did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion: The perfusion index response to semiorthostatic stress in sepsis patients is a simple and inexpensive method that can be used to detect the sympathetic-microvascular response at the bedside and appears to have prognostic value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周灌注对半直立应激的反应:一种评估脓毒症患者自主神经功能障碍的简单方法?
目的:评价灌注指数对半直立应激的反应能否用于脓毒症患者交感血管反应的监测。方法:将患者分为A组(30例健康患者)、B组(30例无脓毒症的危重患者)和C组(92例脓毒症患者)。患者接受半直立性应激试验(头部抬高0 ~ 60度),并评估血流动力学、灌注指数值和心脏超声数据。对脓毒症患者进行SOFA评分,比较试验后灌注指数升高和降低的患者。结果:试验结束后,A组患者脑卒中容量显著减少(p < 0.01),心脏指数显著降低(p < 0.05),心率显著升高(p < 0.05),平均动脉压显著升高(p < 0.001)。在个体分析中,A组的灌注指数下降(p < 0.001),而B组和C组的反应则是异质性的。此外,与灌注指数升高组相比,试验后灌注指数降低的脓毒症患者在72小时时的SOFA评分显著降低(p < 0.05)。然而,delta-SOFA评分在两组之间没有差异。结论:脓毒症患者对半直立应激的灌注指数反应是一种简单、廉价的检测床边交感微血管反应的方法,具有预测预后的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Care of the chronic dialysis patient in the intensive care unit: a state-of-the-art review. Intensive Care Medicine in Portugal. Predictive factors for high-flow nasal cannula failure in patients with acute viral bronchiolitis admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. A national survey of Intensive Care Medicine Services in Portugal: where we are and the road ahead. Analysis of the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit and its correlation with measures of muscle strength in critically ill patients during hospitalization in the intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1