Benefits of promoting scholarship among program directors: promoting scholarship among directors is a win-win-win for institutions, trainees, and directors.

IF 1.6 Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2024.1477471
Patrick D Brandt, Donita L Robinson
{"title":"Benefits of promoting scholarship among program directors: promoting scholarship among directors is a win-win-win for institutions, trainees, and directors.","authors":"Patrick D Brandt, Donita L Robinson","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1477471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget doubled in the late 1990s, it led to a rise in the number of PhD-trained scientists and to increased NIH-funded programs to diversify the biomedical workforce. This trend has seen more PhD scientists take on leadership roles as program directors in academia. These program directors are often highly skilled in research design and data analysis, and they bring a scholarly approach to their administrative duties. Despite organizational challenges, promoting scholarship among program directors offers numerous benefits, including enhanced institutional reputation and better training outcomes. Herein we use examples from peer reviewed literature to illustrate how publications by program directors have influenced national policies and practices in biomedical training. Encouraging more academic institutions to support program director scholarship can yield significant returns for institutions, trainees, and the directors themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"9 ","pages":"1477471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1477471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget doubled in the late 1990s, it led to a rise in the number of PhD-trained scientists and to increased NIH-funded programs to diversify the biomedical workforce. This trend has seen more PhD scientists take on leadership roles as program directors in academia. These program directors are often highly skilled in research design and data analysis, and they bring a scholarly approach to their administrative duties. Despite organizational challenges, promoting scholarship among program directors offers numerous benefits, including enhanced institutional reputation and better training outcomes. Herein we use examples from peer reviewed literature to illustrate how publications by program directors have influenced national policies and practices in biomedical training. Encouraging more academic institutions to support program director scholarship can yield significant returns for institutions, trainees, and the directors themselves.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推广项目主任奖学金的好处:推广项目主任奖学金对机构、学员和项目主任来说是一个三赢的局面。
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的预算在20世纪90年代末翻了一番,这导致了博士培养的科学家数量的增加,并增加了NIH资助的项目,以使生物医学工作人员多样化。这一趋势使得越来越多的博士科学家在学术界担任项目主管的领导角色。这些项目主管通常在研究设计和数据分析方面非常熟练,他们将学术方法带到他们的行政职责中。尽管存在组织上的挑战,但在项目主管中推广奖学金有很多好处,包括提高机构声誉和更好的培训效果。在此,我们使用同行评议文献中的例子来说明项目主任的出版物如何影响国家生物医学培训的政策和实践。鼓励更多的学术机构支持项目主任奖学金,可以为机构、学员和主任本身带来可观的回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Managing technological sovereignty: a systematic review of semiconductor industry policy and regional ecosystem governance. Generative artificial intelligence in the publishing industry: adoption, use, intellectual property, and other challenges. What evidence syntheses reveal about PROSPERO, INPLASY, OSF, the Research Registry, and protocols.io: a meta-research study. Ubuntu as a blueprint: learning ethical transdisciplinarity from African indigenous knowledge systems. Data collection methods in qualitative research: researchers' reflections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1