Radhika Duggal , Mark Liu , Trisha Shang , Peng Ding
{"title":"Risk of nasal septal perforation following nasal packing for epistaxis in the emergency department","authors":"Radhika Duggal , Mark Liu , Trisha Shang , Peng Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Nasal packing is commonly employed in the emergency department (ED) to manage epistaxis that does not respond to conservative treatments. However, this intervention may increase the risk of nasal septal perforation (NSP) due to reduced blood flow to the nasal septum. No prior study has explored the relationship between nasal packing and risk of NSP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined all patients who received non-absorbable nasal packing in the ED at our institution, identifying 19 patients diagnosed with NSP post-treatment and 50 randomly selected patients without NSP for comparison. <em>t-</em>Tests and Chi square tests were utilized to compare numeric and categoric variables respectively and a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to assess risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics of individuals who developed NSP were similar to those of the comparison group, with the exception of tobacco use. Interestingly, individuals with NSP had a lower rate of tobacco use (21 % vs 64 % current/former users, <em>p</em> = 0.004). Univariable analysis revealed that patients with NSP had a longer mean duration of nasal packing (5 vs 3 days, <em>p</em> = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that each additional day of packing increased odds of NSP by 77 %, and bilateral packing, compared to unilateral, was associated with four times the odds of NSP.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings indicate that prolonged nasal packing increases the risk of NSP. Prospective, large-scale studies are needed to identify patients at risk for NSP after nasal packing in the ED and to inform guidelines on the removal of nasal packing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 1","pages":"Article 104552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924003387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Nasal packing is commonly employed in the emergency department (ED) to manage epistaxis that does not respond to conservative treatments. However, this intervention may increase the risk of nasal septal perforation (NSP) due to reduced blood flow to the nasal septum. No prior study has explored the relationship between nasal packing and risk of NSP.
Methods
We examined all patients who received non-absorbable nasal packing in the ED at our institution, identifying 19 patients diagnosed with NSP post-treatment and 50 randomly selected patients without NSP for comparison. t-Tests and Chi square tests were utilized to compare numeric and categoric variables respectively and a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to assess risk factors.
Results
Baseline characteristics of individuals who developed NSP were similar to those of the comparison group, with the exception of tobacco use. Interestingly, individuals with NSP had a lower rate of tobacco use (21 % vs 64 % current/former users, p = 0.004). Univariable analysis revealed that patients with NSP had a longer mean duration of nasal packing (5 vs 3 days, p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that each additional day of packing increased odds of NSP by 77 %, and bilateral packing, compared to unilateral, was associated with four times the odds of NSP.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that prolonged nasal packing increases the risk of NSP. Prospective, large-scale studies are needed to identify patients at risk for NSP after nasal packing in the ED and to inform guidelines on the removal of nasal packing.
简介:鼻填充物通常用于急诊科(ED)处理鼻出血,保守治疗无效。然而,由于鼻中隔的血流量减少,这种干预可能会增加鼻中隔穿孔(NSP)的风险。之前没有研究探讨鼻腔填塞与NSP风险之间的关系。方法:我们检查了所有在本院急诊科接受不可吸收性鼻填充物治疗的患者,确定了19例治疗后诊断为NSP的患者和50例随机选择的无NSP的患者进行比较。分别采用t检验和卡方检验比较数值变量和类别变量,并建立多变量logistic回归模型评估危险因素。结果:除吸烟外,NSP患者的基线特征与对照组相似。有趣的是,NSP患者的烟草使用率较低(21% vs 64%, p = 0.004)。单变量分析显示,NSP患者鼻腔填塞的平均持续时间更长(5天vs 3天,p = 0.001)。多变量分析表明,每增加一天的包装,NSP的几率增加77%,与单侧包装相比,双侧包装与NSP的几率增加了四倍。结论:我们的研究结果表明,长时间的鼻腔填塞增加了NSP的风险。需要前瞻性的、大规模的研究来确定急诊科鼻填充物后有NSP风险的患者,并为去除鼻填充物的指南提供信息。
期刊介绍:
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.