Evaluation of aqueous chlorine and peracetic acid sanitizers to inactivate protozoa and bacteria of concern in agricultural water.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Applied and Environmental Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1128/aem.01653-24
Kyle J McCaughan, Zoe Scott, Channah Rock, Kalmia E Kniel
{"title":"Evaluation of aqueous chlorine and peracetic acid sanitizers to inactivate protozoa and bacteria of concern in agricultural water.","authors":"Kyle J McCaughan, Zoe Scott, Channah Rock, Kalmia E Kniel","doi":"10.1128/aem.01653-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agricultural water is a potential source of microbial contamination whereby <i>Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Cryptosporidium,</i> and <i>Cyclospora cayetenensis</i> can enter the food supply. To reduce this risk, effective sanitization of agricultural water may be critical to food safety. As such, it is important to investigate the effects of aqueous peracetic acid (PAA) and chlorine (Cl) on bacteria and protozoa at different treatment times and temperatures in agricultural water with respect to key water characteristics. Multiple concentrations of each sanitizer, ranging from 3 to 200 ppm, were prepared in recently collected agricultural water, the solution was brought to the desired temperature, and the target organisms were added and left for the desired contact time (5 or 10 minutes) when sodium metabisulfite was added to neutralize the sanitizers. Bacterial samples were enumerated on MacConkey or XLT4 agar. Samples with protozoa were added to mammalian cell culture (HCT-8 cells for <i>Cryptosporidium parvum</i> and MDBK cells for <i>Eimeria tenella</i>). After 48 hours, the infected cells were collected, DNA extracted and infectivity assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Low and high concentrations of sanitizer were effective at eliminating bacteria with Cl being significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) more effective. The greatest reductions in <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> (3.48 log and 2.5 log cfu/mL, respectively) were observed after 10 minutes of exposure to 10 ppm Cl. Concentrations of sanitizer 50 ppm and lower resulted in insignificant (<i>P</i> > 0.05) reductions in parasite infectivity of less than 1 log for both organisms. A 200 ppm PAA treatment reduced infectious oocyst populations by 3.8 log for <i>C. parvum</i> and 2.6 log for <i>E. tenella</i>, with Cl being significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) less effective against these organisms.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>This research is critical to inform decisions regarding the application and use of sanitizers in pre-harvest agricultural water settings to enhance food safety. Understanding the effectiveness of chlorine (Cl) and peracetic acid (PAA) on bacteria and protozoa will allow for the more efficient and practical use of these sanitizers, thus improving agricultural practices in ways that are beneficial to both growers and consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8002,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0165324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01653-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural water is a potential source of microbial contamination whereby Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Cryptosporidium, and Cyclospora cayetenensis can enter the food supply. To reduce this risk, effective sanitization of agricultural water may be critical to food safety. As such, it is important to investigate the effects of aqueous peracetic acid (PAA) and chlorine (Cl) on bacteria and protozoa at different treatment times and temperatures in agricultural water with respect to key water characteristics. Multiple concentrations of each sanitizer, ranging from 3 to 200 ppm, were prepared in recently collected agricultural water, the solution was brought to the desired temperature, and the target organisms were added and left for the desired contact time (5 or 10 minutes) when sodium metabisulfite was added to neutralize the sanitizers. Bacterial samples were enumerated on MacConkey or XLT4 agar. Samples with protozoa were added to mammalian cell culture (HCT-8 cells for Cryptosporidium parvum and MDBK cells for Eimeria tenella). After 48 hours, the infected cells were collected, DNA extracted and infectivity assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Low and high concentrations of sanitizer were effective at eliminating bacteria with Cl being significantly (P < 0.05) more effective. The greatest reductions in E. coli and Salmonella (3.48 log and 2.5 log cfu/mL, respectively) were observed after 10 minutes of exposure to 10 ppm Cl. Concentrations of sanitizer 50 ppm and lower resulted in insignificant (P > 0.05) reductions in parasite infectivity of less than 1 log for both organisms. A 200 ppm PAA treatment reduced infectious oocyst populations by 3.8 log for C. parvum and 2.6 log for E. tenella, with Cl being significantly (P < 0.05) less effective against these organisms.

Importance: This research is critical to inform decisions regarding the application and use of sanitizers in pre-harvest agricultural water settings to enhance food safety. Understanding the effectiveness of chlorine (Cl) and peracetic acid (PAA) on bacteria and protozoa will allow for the more efficient and practical use of these sanitizers, thus improving agricultural practices in ways that are beneficial to both growers and consumers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯和过氧乙酸消毒液灭活农业水中原生动物和细菌的效果评价。
农业用水是微生物污染的潜在来源,大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌、隐孢子虫和卡耶滕环孢子虫可以进入食物供应。为了减少这种风险,对农业用水进行有效的卫生处理可能对食品安全至关重要。因此,研究过氧乙酸(PAA)和氯(Cl)在不同处理时间和温度下对农业用水中细菌和原生动物的影响具有重要意义。在最近收集的农业用水中制备了多种浓度的消毒剂,范围从3到200 ppm,将溶液带到所需的温度,然后加入目标生物并保持所需的接触时间(5或10分钟),然后加入焦亚硫酸钠来中和消毒剂。细菌样本在MacConkey或XLT4琼脂上进行计数。将带有原虫的样品加入哺乳动物细胞培养中(细小隐孢子虫的HCT-8细胞和柔嫩艾美耳虫的MDBK细胞)。48h后,收集感染细胞,提取DNA,采用定量PCR (qPCR)检测感染性。低浓度和高浓度消毒剂对细菌的杀灭效果均显著高于氯(P < 0.05)。在暴露于10 ppm Cl中10分钟后,大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的减少幅度最大(分别为3.48 log和2.5 log cfu/mL)。消毒剂浓度为50 ppm及更低时,两种生物的寄生虫传染性降低幅度均小于1 log,但效果不显著(P > 0.05)。200 ppm PAA处理可使感染性卵囊数量减少3.8 log的细小梭菌和2.6 log的柔嫩梭菌,其中Cl对这些生物体的作用显著(P < 0.05)降低。重要性:这项研究对于在收获前农业用水环境中应用和使用杀菌剂以提高食品安全的决策至关重要。了解氯(Cl)和过氧乙酸(PAA)对细菌和原生动物的有效性,将有助于更有效和更实际地使用这些杀菌剂,从而以有利于种植者和消费者的方式改进农业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
730
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied and Environmental Microbiology (AEM) publishes papers that make significant contributions to (a) applied microbiology, including biotechnology, protein engineering, bioremediation, and food microbiology, (b) microbial ecology, including environmental, organismic, and genomic microbiology, and (c) interdisciplinary microbiology, including invertebrate microbiology, plant microbiology, aquatic microbiology, and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Inactivation of deposited bioaerosols on food contact surfaces with UV-C light emitting diode devices. Variability in cadmium tolerance of closely related Listeria monocytogenes isolates originating from dairy processing environments. Postdocs should receive relocation benefits from the universities that hire them. Systematic analysis of the glucose-PTS in Streptococcus sanguinis highlighted its importance in central metabolism and bacterial fitness. Papain expression in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm by T7-promoter engineering and co-expression with human protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) and thiol peroxidase (GPx7) genes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1