The effectiveness of probiotics or synbiotics in the prevention and treatment of diarrhea among critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition ESPEN Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.11.025
Boshra Bagdadi, Ali Alqazlane, May Alotaibi, Ahlam Alamoudi, Laila Baghdadi, Amna MohammadMahmood, Ibrahim Al-Neami, Idrees Fageehi, Mater Salamah, Sami Majrabi
{"title":"The effectiveness of probiotics or synbiotics in the prevention and treatment of diarrhea among critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Boshra Bagdadi, Ali Alqazlane, May Alotaibi, Ahlam Alamoudi, Laila Baghdadi, Amna MohammadMahmood, Ibrahim Al-Neami, Idrees Fageehi, Mater Salamah, Sami Majrabi","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Diarrhea is one of the most common complications among patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Alongside common medical products for managing diarrhea, attention has been directed toward natural approaches, such as the use of probiotics or synbiotics supplements. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics or synbiotics in the prevention and treatment of diarrhea, mortality, and length of ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In adherence to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) statement, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Relevant articles were identified by searching PubMed, SpringerLink, and ScienceDirect databases. Quality assessment was done using Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized-controlled trials (ROB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6305 articles were identified, of which 14 papers were included. Probiotics reduced the risk of diarrhea by 10 %; however, the result was not statistically significant [Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.90; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 0.77 to 1.05; P = 0.16; I<sup>2</sup> = 29 %; 13 studies]. No statistical significance was found among studies regarding reducing the duration of diarrhea, with considerable heterogeneity [RR = - 0.53; 95 % CI: -1.46 to 0.41; P = 0.27; I<sup>2</sup> = 71 %, 5 studies]. Neither the length of ICU stays nor the mortality rate was affected by the use of probiotics or synbiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Probiotics or synbiotics appear to slightly reduce the incidence of diarrhea among ICU patients. However, this effect is considered statistically significant only after conducting sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Further high-quality clinical trials are required to evaluate the potential of probiotics or synbiotics in the treatment of diarrhea among critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":"218-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.11.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Diarrhea is one of the most common complications among patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Alongside common medical products for managing diarrhea, attention has been directed toward natural approaches, such as the use of probiotics or synbiotics supplements. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics or synbiotics in the prevention and treatment of diarrhea, mortality, and length of ICU stay.

Methods: In adherence to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) statement, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Relevant articles were identified by searching PubMed, SpringerLink, and ScienceDirect databases. Quality assessment was done using Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized-controlled trials (ROB2).

Results: 6305 articles were identified, of which 14 papers were included. Probiotics reduced the risk of diarrhea by 10 %; however, the result was not statistically significant [Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.90; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 0.77 to 1.05; P = 0.16; I2 = 29 %; 13 studies]. No statistical significance was found among studies regarding reducing the duration of diarrhea, with considerable heterogeneity [RR = - 0.53; 95 % CI: -1.46 to 0.41; P = 0.27; I2 = 71 %, 5 studies]. Neither the length of ICU stays nor the mortality rate was affected by the use of probiotics or synbiotics.

Conclusion: Probiotics or synbiotics appear to slightly reduce the incidence of diarrhea among ICU patients. However, this effect is considered statistically significant only after conducting sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Further high-quality clinical trials are required to evaluate the potential of probiotics or synbiotics in the treatment of diarrhea among critically ill patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌或合成菌在预防和治疗重症成人腹泻中的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:腹泻是重症监护病房(ICU)患者最常见的并发症之一。除了常见的治疗腹泻的医疗产品外,人们的注意力一直指向自然方法,如使用益生菌或合成制剂补充剂。本综述的目的是评价益生菌或合成菌在预防和治疗腹泻、死亡率和ICU住院时间方面的有效性。方法:根据系统评价和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明中概述的指南,进行系统评价和元分析。通过检索PubMed、SpringerLink和ScienceDirect数据库确定相关文章。使用Cochrane协作的随机对照试验(ROB2)工具进行质量评估。结果:共识别论文6305篇,其中纳入14篇。益生菌使腹泻的风险降低了10%;但结果无统计学意义[风险比(RR) = 0.90;95%置信区间(CI): 0.77 ~ 1.05;P = 0.16;I2 = 29%;13个研究)。关于减少腹泻持续时间的研究间无统计学意义,存在相当大的异质性[RR = - 0.53;95% CI: -1.46 ~ 0.41;P = 0.27;[2 = 71%, 5项研究]。使用益生菌或合成菌对ICU住院时间和死亡率均无影响。结论:益生菌或合成菌制剂可轻微降低ICU患者腹泻的发生率。然而,只有在进行敏感性和亚组分析后,这种效应才被认为具有统计学意义。需要进一步的高质量临床试验来评估益生菌或合成菌治疗危重患者腹泻的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Dawn-to-dusk intermittent fasting is associated with overexpression of autophagy genes: A prospective study on overweight and obese cohort. Course of measured energy expenditure over the first 10 days of critical illness: A nested prospective study in an adult surgical ICU. Letter to the editor: Comment on "Maternal non-compliance with recommended folic acid supplement use alters global DNA methylation in cord blood of newborns: A cohort study". Pathophysiological mechanisms of gut dysbiosis and food allergy and an investigation of probiotics as an intervention for atopic disease. Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α modulator improves hypertriglyceridemia and muscle quality in patients with chronic kidney disease: A retrospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1