Indices of healthy and unhealthy plant-based diets and the risk of selected digestive cancers

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.11.039
Federica Turati , Silvia Mignozzi , Giovanna Esposito , Francesca Bravi , Angela D'Angelo , Gianfranco Alicandro , Werner Garavello , Livia S.A. Augustin , Sara Vitale , Attilio Giacosa , Ettore Bidoli , Jerry Polesel , Eva Negri , Monica Ferraroni , Carlo La Vecchia
{"title":"Indices of healthy and unhealthy plant-based diets and the risk of selected digestive cancers","authors":"Federica Turati ,&nbsp;Silvia Mignozzi ,&nbsp;Giovanna Esposito ,&nbsp;Francesca Bravi ,&nbsp;Angela D'Angelo ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Alicandro ,&nbsp;Werner Garavello ,&nbsp;Livia S.A. Augustin ,&nbsp;Sara Vitale ,&nbsp;Attilio Giacosa ,&nbsp;Ettore Bidoli ,&nbsp;Jerry Polesel ,&nbsp;Eva Negri ,&nbsp;Monica Ferraroni ,&nbsp;Carlo La Vecchia","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.11.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>The relation between various types of plant-based diets and cancer risk is still unclear. We examined the association of the overall plant-based diet index (PDI) and healthy (hPDI) and unhealthy plant-based diet indices (uPDI) with the risk of selected digestive cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from a network of hospital-based case–control studies including 942 oral/pharyngeal, 304 esophageal, 230 stomach, 1953 colorectal, and 326 pancreatic cancer cases. We calculated PDI, hPDI, and uPDI from a validated food frequency questionnaire. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of selected digestive cancers across the three indices (in quintiles, Q, or tertiles, T, and in continuous).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PDI was significantly inversely associated with oral/pharyngeal (OR<sub>Q5 vs Q1</sub>=0.63, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.47–0.84) and esophageal cancer risk (OR<sub>T3 vs T1</sub>=0.47, 95% CI 0.31–0.72). The inverse associations appeared stronger for the hPDI (oral cavity/pharynx: OR<sub>Q5 vs Q1</sub>=0.52; 95% CI 0.39–0.70; esophagus: OR<sub>T3 vs T1</sub>=0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.91; stomach: OR<sub>T3 vs T1</sub>=0.42, 95% CI 0.27–0.67; colorectum: OR<sub>Q5 vs Q1</sub>=0.69; 95% CI 0.57–0.84; pancreas: OR<sub>T3 vs T1</sub>=0.60; 95% CI 0.41–0.89). In contrast, the uPDI was directly associated with the risk of oral/pharyngeal (OR<sub>Q5 vs Q1</sub>=1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.94), colorectal (OR<sub>Q5 vs Q1</sub>=2.28, 95% CI 1.86–2.81), and pancreatic cancer (OR<sub>T3 vs T1</sub>=1.74, 95% CI 1.14–2.65). Esophageal and stomach cancer risks were non-significantly increased by 34% and 46% respectively in the highest uPDI quantile.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A plant-based diet, especially a healthy plant-based diet, may reduce the risk of various digestive cancers, whereas an unhealthy plant-based diet may increase the risk. The quality of plant-based diets is important for digestive cancer risk evaluation and prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 76-85"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424004369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims

The relation between various types of plant-based diets and cancer risk is still unclear. We examined the association of the overall plant-based diet index (PDI) and healthy (hPDI) and unhealthy plant-based diet indices (uPDI) with the risk of selected digestive cancers.

Methods

We used data from a network of hospital-based case–control studies including 942 oral/pharyngeal, 304 esophageal, 230 stomach, 1953 colorectal, and 326 pancreatic cancer cases. We calculated PDI, hPDI, and uPDI from a validated food frequency questionnaire. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of selected digestive cancers across the three indices (in quintiles, Q, or tertiles, T, and in continuous).

Results

The PDI was significantly inversely associated with oral/pharyngeal (ORQ5 vs Q1=0.63, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.47–0.84) and esophageal cancer risk (ORT3 vs T1=0.47, 95% CI 0.31–0.72). The inverse associations appeared stronger for the hPDI (oral cavity/pharynx: ORQ5 vs Q1=0.52; 95% CI 0.39–0.70; esophagus: ORT3 vs T1=0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.91; stomach: ORT3 vs T1=0.42, 95% CI 0.27–0.67; colorectum: ORQ5 vs Q1=0.69; 95% CI 0.57–0.84; pancreas: ORT3 vs T1=0.60; 95% CI 0.41–0.89). In contrast, the uPDI was directly associated with the risk of oral/pharyngeal (ORQ5 vs Q1=1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.94), colorectal (ORQ5 vs Q1=2.28, 95% CI 1.86–2.81), and pancreatic cancer (ORT3 vs T1=1.74, 95% CI 1.14–2.65). Esophageal and stomach cancer risks were non-significantly increased by 34% and 46% respectively in the highest uPDI quantile.

Conclusion

A plant-based diet, especially a healthy plant-based diet, may reduce the risk of various digestive cancers, whereas an unhealthy plant-based diet may increase the risk. The quality of plant-based diets is important for digestive cancer risk evaluation and prevention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康和不健康植物性饮食的指数和某些消化系统癌症的风险。
背景与目的:各种植物性饮食与癌症风险之间的关系尚不清楚。我们研究了总体植物性饮食指数(PDI)、健康植物性饮食指数(hPDI)和不健康植物性饮食指数(uPDI)与特定消化系统癌症风险的关系。方法:我们使用基于医院的病例对照研究网络的数据,包括942例口服/咽癌、304例食管癌、230例胃癌、1953例结直肠癌和326例胰腺癌。我们从一份经过验证的食物频率问卷中计算了PDI、hPDI和uPDI。我们使用多变量logistic回归模型来估计三个指数(五分位数,Q,或四分位数,T和连续)中选定消化道癌症的比值比(OR)。结果:PDI与口服/咽癌(ORQ5 vs Q1=0.63, 95%可信区间CI, 0.47-0.84)和食管癌风险呈显著负相关(ORT3 vs T1=0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72)。与hPDI(口腔/咽部:ORQ5 vs Q1=0.52;95% ci 0.39-0.70;食管:ORT3 vs T1=0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.91;胃:ORT3 vs T1=0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.67;结直肠:ORQ5 vs Q1=0.69;95% ci 0.57-0.84;胰腺:ORT3 vs T1=0.60;95% ci 0.41-0.89)。相比之下,uPDI与口腔/咽部(ORQ5 vs Q1=1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.94)、结直肠癌(ORQ5 vs Q1=2.28, 95% CI 1.86-2.81)和胰腺癌(ORT3 vs T1=1.74, 95% CI 1.14-2.65)的风险直接相关。在uPDI最高的分位数中,食管癌和胃癌的风险分别增加了34%和46%。结论:植物性饮食,尤其是健康的植物性饮食,可能会降低患各种消化系统癌症的风险,而不健康的植物性饮食可能会增加风险。植物性饮食的质量对消化道癌症风险评估和预防很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
期刊最新文献
An umbrella review of meta-analyses on the effects of microbial therapy in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease Muscle mass mediates the association between dietary diversity and mortality among the older adults: A prospective cohort study Serum tryptophan and kynurenine levels and risk of heart failure among patients with chronic kidney disease On how to feed critically ill children in intensive care: A slowly shifting paradigm Effect of ultra-processed food consumption on the gut microbiota in the first year of life: Findings from the MINA–Brazil birth cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1