Machine Learning Models for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Detrusor Underactivity in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Neurourology Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.5213/inj.2448360.180
Hyungkyung Shin, Kwang Jin Ko, Wei-Jin Park, Deok Hyun Han, Ikjun Yeom, Kyu-Sung Lee
{"title":"Machine Learning Models for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Detrusor Underactivity in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.","authors":"Hyungkyung Shin, Kwang Jin Ko, Wei-Jin Park, Deok Hyun Han, Ikjun Yeom, Kyu-Sung Lee","doi":"10.5213/inj.2448360.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models, specifically CatBoost and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), for diagnosing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in male patients. The objective is to differentiate between bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and detrusor underactivity (DUA) using a comprehensive dataset that includes patient-reported outcomes, uroflowmetry measurements, and ultrasound-derived features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dataset used in this study was collected from male patients aged 40 and older who presented with LUTS and sought treatment at the urology department of Samsung Medical Center. We developed and trained CatBoost and XGBoost models using this dataset. These models incorporated features like prostate size, voiding parameters, and responses from questionnaires. Their performance was assessed using standard metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that the CatBoost models displayed greater sensitivity, rendering them effective for initial screenings by accurately identifying true positive cases. Conversely, the XGBoost models showed higher specificity and precision, making them more suitable for confirming diagnoses and reducing false positives. In terms of overall performance for both BOO and DUA, XGBoost surpassed CatBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.826 and 0.819, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating these machine learning models into the diagnostic workflow for LUTS can significantly enhance clinical decision-making by offering noninvasive, cost-effective, and patient-friendly diagnostic alternatives. The combined application of CatBoost and XGBoost models has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide customized treatment plans for patients, ultimately leading to better clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14466,"journal":{"name":"International Neurourology Journal","volume":"28 Suppl 2","pages":"S74-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Neurourology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2448360.180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models, specifically CatBoost and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), for diagnosing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in male patients. The objective is to differentiate between bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and detrusor underactivity (DUA) using a comprehensive dataset that includes patient-reported outcomes, uroflowmetry measurements, and ultrasound-derived features.

Methods: The dataset used in this study was collected from male patients aged 40 and older who presented with LUTS and sought treatment at the urology department of Samsung Medical Center. We developed and trained CatBoost and XGBoost models using this dataset. These models incorporated features like prostate size, voiding parameters, and responses from questionnaires. Their performance was assessed using standard metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: The results indicated that the CatBoost models displayed greater sensitivity, rendering them effective for initial screenings by accurately identifying true positive cases. Conversely, the XGBoost models showed higher specificity and precision, making them more suitable for confirming diagnoses and reducing false positives. In terms of overall performance for both BOO and DUA, XGBoost surpassed CatBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.826 and 0.819, respectively.

Conclusion: Integrating these machine learning models into the diagnostic workflow for LUTS can significantly enhance clinical decision-making by offering noninvasive, cost-effective, and patient-friendly diagnostic alternatives. The combined application of CatBoost and XGBoost models has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide customized treatment plans for patients, ultimately leading to better clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下尿路症状男性膀胱出口梗阻和逼尿肌活动不足的无创诊断机器学习模型
目的:本研究旨在开发和评估机器学习模型,特别是CatBoost和极端梯度增强(XGBoost),用于诊断男性患者的下尿路症状(LUTS)。目的是通过一个综合数据集来区分膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)和逼尿肌活动不足(DUA),该数据集包括患者报告的结果、尿流测量和超声衍生特征。方法:本研究使用的数据集来自于年龄在40岁及以上的男性患者,他们在三星医疗中心泌尿外科就诊。我们使用这个数据集开发并训练了CatBoost和XGBoost模型。这些模型结合了前列腺大小、排尿参数和问卷回答等特征。使用准确度、精密度、召回率、f1评分和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)等标准指标评估他们的表现。结果:结果表明CatBoost模型显示出更高的灵敏度,通过准确识别真阳性病例,使其在初始筛选中有效。相反,XGBoost模型具有更高的特异性和精度,使其更适合于确诊和减少假阳性。就BOO和DUA的整体性能而言,XGBoost超过了CatBoost, AUROC分别为0.826和0.819。结论:将这些机器学习模型集成到LUTS的诊断工作流程中,可以通过提供无创、经济高效和患者友好的诊断替代方案,显著提高临床决策能力。CatBoost和XGBoost模型的联合应用有可能提高诊断准确性,并为患者提供定制的治疗方案,最终获得更好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Neurourology Journal
International Neurourology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Neurourology Journal (Int Neurourol J, INJ) is a quarterly international journal that publishes high-quality research papers that provide the most significant and promising achievements in the fields of clinical neurourology and fundamental science. Specifically, fundamental science includes the most influential research papers from all fields of science and technology, revolutionizing what physicians and researchers practicing the art of neurourology worldwide know. Thus, we welcome valuable basic research articles to introduce cutting-edge translational research of fundamental sciences to clinical neurourology. In the editorials, urologists will present their perspectives on these articles. The original mission statement of the INJ was published on October 12, 1997. INJ provides authors a fast review of their work and makes a decision in an average of three to four weeks of receiving submissions. If accepted, articles are posted online in fully citable form. Supplementary issues will be published interim to quarterlies, as necessary, to fully allow berth to accept and publish relevant articles.
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Bipolar Radiofrequency Thermotherapy Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Storage Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Application of Augmented Reality for Accurate Punctures During Stage 1 Sacral Neuromodulation. Difficulties in Manipulating the Female Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pump: Prevalence and Management. Effect of Eugenol on Detrusor Muscle: Potential for Overactive Bladder Treatment. Efficacy of Combined Therapy With Silodosin and Solifenacin in Females With Overactive Bladder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1