Comparison of the BluePoint MoldID oligonucleotide array and Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for the identification of filamentous fungi.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01048-24
Chia-Hua Chou, Qiao-Ting Chao, Yun-Shan Lu, Tai-Fen Lee, Po-Ren Hsueh, Yu-Tsung Huang, Chun-Hsing Liao
{"title":"Comparison of the BluePoint MoldID oligonucleotide array and Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for the identification of filamentous fungi.","authors":"Chia-Hua Chou, Qiao-Ting Chao, Yun-Shan Lu, Tai-Fen Lee, Po-Ren Hsueh, Yu-Tsung Huang, Chun-Hsing Liao","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01048-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BluePoint MoldID can identify 43 fungal species through nucleic acid array hybridization and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) can identify 247 filamentous fungi through mass spectrometry. First, 43 standard isolates from the Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Taiwan, and the College of American Pathologists and 41 clinical <i>Aspergillus</i> species isolates confirmed by rDNA-ITS sequencing were analyzed using BluePoint MoldID and Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. BluePoint MoldID accurately identified 79% (34/43) of the standard isolates to the species level but failed to recognize nine isolates absent from its database; additionally, 87.8% (36/41) of the clinical isolates were identified at the species level, with 80.5% (33/41) accuracy. MALDI-TOF MS identified 86% (37/43) of the standard isolates, with 81.4% (35/43) accurately identified at the species level and two at the genus level, and identified all the clinical isolates, with 92.6% (38/41) accurately identified at the species level. Next, we analyzed 93 clinical <i>Aspergillus</i> species and compared the results by rDNA-ITS sequencing. BluePoint MoldID identified 87.1% (81/93) of the isolates at the species level, with 80.6% (75/93) accuracy. MALDI-TOF MS identified 97.8% (91/93) of the isolates, including some uncommon species, with 90.3% (84/93) accuracy at the species level. BluePoint MoldID and MALDI-TOF MS had turnaround times of 8 and 2 h, respectively, significantly reducing the time needed to identify filamentous fungi.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The BluePoint MoldID kit is an oligonucleotide array used for the identification of filamentous fungi, and it has not yet been mentioned in recent studies. We used a BluePoint MoldID kit to identify standard and clinical filamentous fungal isolates and compared its performance with that of Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. The former accurately identified 80.2% of the isolates (142/177), and the latter identified 92.6% of the isolates (164/177). The performance of the BluePoint MoldID kit was slightly inferior to that of Bruker MALDI-TOF MS because of the smaller database. However, the BluePoint MoldID kit can cover most clinically common opportunistic fungal infections; thus, it offers an alternative method for laboratories that lack MALDI-TOF MS equipment, as the device is less expensive.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0104824"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01048-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BluePoint MoldID can identify 43 fungal species through nucleic acid array hybridization and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) can identify 247 filamentous fungi through mass spectrometry. First, 43 standard isolates from the Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Taiwan, and the College of American Pathologists and 41 clinical Aspergillus species isolates confirmed by rDNA-ITS sequencing were analyzed using BluePoint MoldID and Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. BluePoint MoldID accurately identified 79% (34/43) of the standard isolates to the species level but failed to recognize nine isolates absent from its database; additionally, 87.8% (36/41) of the clinical isolates were identified at the species level, with 80.5% (33/41) accuracy. MALDI-TOF MS identified 86% (37/43) of the standard isolates, with 81.4% (35/43) accurately identified at the species level and two at the genus level, and identified all the clinical isolates, with 92.6% (38/41) accurately identified at the species level. Next, we analyzed 93 clinical Aspergillus species and compared the results by rDNA-ITS sequencing. BluePoint MoldID identified 87.1% (81/93) of the isolates at the species level, with 80.6% (75/93) accuracy. MALDI-TOF MS identified 97.8% (91/93) of the isolates, including some uncommon species, with 90.3% (84/93) accuracy at the species level. BluePoint MoldID and MALDI-TOF MS had turnaround times of 8 and 2 h, respectively, significantly reducing the time needed to identify filamentous fungi.

Importance: The BluePoint MoldID kit is an oligonucleotide array used for the identification of filamentous fungi, and it has not yet been mentioned in recent studies. We used a BluePoint MoldID kit to identify standard and clinical filamentous fungal isolates and compared its performance with that of Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. The former accurately identified 80.2% of the isolates (142/177), and the latter identified 92.6% of the isolates (164/177). The performance of the BluePoint MoldID kit was slightly inferior to that of Bruker MALDI-TOF MS because of the smaller database. However, the BluePoint MoldID kit can cover most clinically common opportunistic fungal infections; thus, it offers an alternative method for laboratories that lack MALDI-TOF MS equipment, as the device is less expensive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BluePoint MoldID寡核苷酸阵列与Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF质谱鉴定丝状真菌的比较。
BluePoint MoldID通过核酸阵列杂交和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定了43种真菌,通过质谱鉴定了247种丝状真菌。首先,利用BluePoint MoldID和Bruker MALDI-TOF ms对来自台湾生物资源收集与研究中心和美国病理学会的43株标准分离株和41株经rDNA-ITS测序证实的临床曲霉属分离株进行分析,其中79%(34/43)的标准分离株准确识别到种水平,但9株未能识别出数据库中缺失的分离株;87.8%(36/41)的临床分离菌在种水平上被鉴定,准确率为80.5%(33/41)。MALDI-TOF MS鉴定出86%(37/43)的标准分离株,其中81.4%(35/43)在种水平上准确鉴定,2株在属水平上准确鉴定;全部临床分离株在种水平上准确鉴定92.6%(38/41)。接下来,我们分析了93种临床曲霉,并通过rDNA-ITS测序对结果进行了比较。BluePoint MoldID在种水平上的鉴定准确率为87.1%(81/93),准确率为80.6%(75/93)。MALDI-TOF MS鉴定出97.8%(91/93)的分离菌株,其中包括一些罕见的物种,在物种水平上的准确率为90.3%(84/93)。BluePoint MoldID和MALDI-TOF MS的周转时间分别为8和2小时,显著减少了鉴定丝状真菌所需的时间。重要性:BluePoint MoldID试剂盒是一种用于丝状真菌鉴定的寡核苷酸阵列,在最近的研究中尚未被提及。采用BluePoint MoldID试剂盒对标准丝状真菌和临床丝状真菌进行鉴定,并与Bruker MALDI-TOF ms进行比较,前者的鉴定准确率为80.2%(142/177),后者的鉴定准确率为92.6%(164/177)。由于数据库较小,BluePoint MoldID试剂盒的性能略低于Bruker MALDI-TOF MS。然而,BluePoint MoldID试剂盒可以覆盖大多数临床常见的机会性真菌感染;因此,它为缺乏MALDI-TOF质谱设备的实验室提供了一种替代方法,因为该设备较便宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Nanopore sequencing for precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance: a retrospective multicenter study in China. External quality assessment of molecular detection and variant typing of SARS-CoV-2 in European expert laboratories in 2023. Lipid fingerprinting by MALDI Biotyper Sirius instrument fails to differentiate the three subspecies of the Mycobacterium abscessus complex. The impact of FDA-cleared molecular solutions for BK polyomavirus quantitation. A rapid and simple MALDI-TOF MS lipid profiling method for differentiating Mycobacterium ulcerans from Mycobacterium marinum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1