A qualitative investigation to identify return to sports criteria after shoulder stabilization surgery used by professional team physicians.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1177/10225536241302219
Mike Szlufcik, Mario Pasurka, John Theodoropoulos, Marcel Betsch
{"title":"A qualitative investigation to identify return to sports criteria after shoulder stabilization surgery used by professional team physicians.","authors":"Mike Szlufcik, Mario Pasurka, John Theodoropoulos, Marcel Betsch","doi":"10.1177/10225536241302219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Purpose of this study is to explore currently utilized readiness to return to sports (RTS) criteria after shoulder stabilization surgery used in elite athletes to gain novel insights into the RTS decision making process of professional team physicians.<b>Methods:</b> 19 qualitative semi-structured interviews with professional team physicians were conducted by a single trained interviewer. The interviews were used to identify team physician concepts and themes regarding the criteria used to determine RTS after shoulder stabilization surgery. General inductive analysis and a coding process were used to identify themes and sub-themes arising from the data. A hierarchical approach in coding helped to link themes.<b>Results:</b> We were able to identify five key themes that participating physicians focused on to determine RTS decision making: external influence, objective and subjective criteria, time elapsed since surgery and type of sport. The most important RTS criteria included: range of motion and muscle strength followed by clinical joint stability, time since surgery, ability of sporting movement, psychological readiness, functional testing, absence of pain and allied team support.<b>Conclusion:</b> This study identified several main themes and subordinate minor themes as having the most influence on RTS decision after shoulder surgery. We showed that even among specialized professional team physicians, the main criteria to RTS in these categories were inconsistent necessitating the future development of specific RTS guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 3","pages":"10225536241302219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241302219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Purpose of this study is to explore currently utilized readiness to return to sports (RTS) criteria after shoulder stabilization surgery used in elite athletes to gain novel insights into the RTS decision making process of professional team physicians.Methods: 19 qualitative semi-structured interviews with professional team physicians were conducted by a single trained interviewer. The interviews were used to identify team physician concepts and themes regarding the criteria used to determine RTS after shoulder stabilization surgery. General inductive analysis and a coding process were used to identify themes and sub-themes arising from the data. A hierarchical approach in coding helped to link themes.Results: We were able to identify five key themes that participating physicians focused on to determine RTS decision making: external influence, objective and subjective criteria, time elapsed since surgery and type of sport. The most important RTS criteria included: range of motion and muscle strength followed by clinical joint stability, time since surgery, ability of sporting movement, psychological readiness, functional testing, absence of pain and allied team support.Conclusion: This study identified several main themes and subordinate minor themes as having the most influence on RTS decision after shoulder surgery. We showed that even among specialized professional team physicians, the main criteria to RTS in these categories were inconsistent necessitating the future development of specific RTS guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项定性调查,以确定由专业团队医生使用的肩部稳定手术后恢复运动标准。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨目前使用的精英运动员肩部稳定手术后重返运动准备(RTS)标准,以获得专业团队医生的RTS决策过程的新见解。方法:由一名训练有素的采访者对专业团队医生进行19次定性半结构化访谈。访谈用于确定团队医生关于确定肩部稳定手术后RTS标准的概念和主题。一般归纳分析和编码过程被用来确定从数据产生的主题和子主题。编码中的分层方法有助于将主题联系起来。结果:我们能够确定参与的医生在决定RTS决策时关注的五个关键主题:外部影响、客观和主观标准、手术后经过的时间和运动类型。最重要的RTS标准包括:运动范围和肌肉力量,其次是临床关节稳定性,手术后时间,运动能力,心理准备,功能测试,疼痛消失和团队支持。结论:本研究确定了几个主要主题和次要主题对肩部手术后的RTS决策影响最大。我们发现,即使在专业的专业团队医生中,这些类别的RTS主要标准也不一致,因此需要未来制定具体的RTS指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Prognosis after one- and two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anxiety and depression as risk factors for postoperative complications and pain in lumbar spine surgery: A national database study Imaging evaluation of extraarticular posterior loose bodies in varus ankle osteoarthritis Oblique sliding ulna osteotomy to treat paediatric neglected monteggia fracture dislocation. Comparative analysis of changes in spinal dimensions following different correction methods in adult spinal deformity surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1