Effect of single-pill versus free equivalent combinations on persistence and major adverse cardiovascular events in hypertension: a real-world analysis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003916
Gábor Simonyi, Michel Burnier, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, György Rokszin, Zsolt Abonyi-Tóth, Gábor Kovács, Praveen Kumar Potukuchi, Mohamed Abdel-Moneim, Csaba Farsang
{"title":"Effect of single-pill versus free equivalent combinations on persistence and major adverse cardiovascular events in hypertension: a real-world analysis.","authors":"Gábor Simonyi, Michel Burnier, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, György Rokszin, Zsolt Abonyi-Tóth, Gábor Kovács, Praveen Kumar Potukuchi, Mohamed Abdel-Moneim, Csaba Farsang","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hypertension guidelines recommend the use of single-pill combinations (SPCs) of antihypertensive drugs to improve treatment persistence and blood pressure control. This study aimed to investigate the long-term effects of ramipril/amlodipine (R/A) SPC versus free equivalent dose combinations (FEC) on cardiovascular outcomes and treatment persistence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study analysed the database of the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund. The study included patients with hypertension aged at least 18 years who were initiated on R/A SPC or FEC of different dose combinations (R/A 5/5, 5/10, 10/5 and 10/10 mg) between 2012 and 2018, with follow-up for up to 60 months. Imbalances in baseline characteristics were reduced with propensity score-based sub-classification. All analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazard model and propensity score sub-classification to adjust the imbalances in baseline characteristics. Drug persistence and MACEs were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 104 882 patients with SPC and 68 324 patients with FEC-treated hypertension were included. The R/A 5/5 mg combination represented the largest proportion (62%). The nonpersistence rate was significantly lower with SPC than with FEC from month 1 to month 24 in the R/A 5/5 mg combination ( P  < 0.001) and during the entire observation period in the remaining combinations. The MACE rate was significantly reduced with all R/A SPCs versus FECs. No effects on age and sex on both endpoints were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study further supports the beneficial effects of the use of SPC on 60-month persistence and MACEs in hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"405-412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Hypertension guidelines recommend the use of single-pill combinations (SPCs) of antihypertensive drugs to improve treatment persistence and blood pressure control. This study aimed to investigate the long-term effects of ramipril/amlodipine (R/A) SPC versus free equivalent dose combinations (FEC) on cardiovascular outcomes and treatment persistence.

Methods: This retrospective, observational study analysed the database of the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund. The study included patients with hypertension aged at least 18 years who were initiated on R/A SPC or FEC of different dose combinations (R/A 5/5, 5/10, 10/5 and 10/10 mg) between 2012 and 2018, with follow-up for up to 60 months. Imbalances in baseline characteristics were reduced with propensity score-based sub-classification. All analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazard model and propensity score sub-classification to adjust the imbalances in baseline characteristics. Drug persistence and MACEs were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

Results: Overall, 104 882 patients with SPC and 68 324 patients with FEC-treated hypertension were included. The R/A 5/5 mg combination represented the largest proportion (62%). The nonpersistence rate was significantly lower with SPC than with FEC from month 1 to month 24 in the R/A 5/5 mg combination ( P  < 0.001) and during the entire observation period in the remaining combinations. The MACE rate was significantly reduced with all R/A SPCs versus FECs. No effects on age and sex on both endpoints were noted.

Conclusion: This study further supports the beneficial effects of the use of SPC on 60-month persistence and MACEs in hypertension.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高血压患者单药与自由等效组合对持久性和主要不良心血管事件的影响:现实世界的分析。
目的:高血压指南推荐使用单片联合抗高血压药物(SPCs)来改善治疗持久性和血压控制。本研究旨在探讨雷米普利/氨氯地平(R/A) SPC与自由等效剂量组合(FEC)对心血管结局和治疗持久性的长期影响。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究分析了匈牙利国家健康保险基金的数据库。该研究纳入了2012年至2018年期间开始使用R/A SPC或FEC不同剂量组合(R/A 5/ 5,5 / 10,10 /5和10/ 10mg)的18岁以上高血压患者,随访时间长达60个月。基于倾向评分的子分类减少了基线特征的不平衡。所有分析均采用Cox比例风险模型和倾向评分亚分类来调整基线特征的不平衡。药物持续性和mace分别是主要和次要终点。结果:总共纳入了104 882例SPC患者和68 324例fec治疗的高血压患者。R/A 5/ 5mg组合所占比例最大(62%)。从第1个月到第24个月,在R/A 5/ 5mg联合用药中,SPC组的非持续率明显低于FEC组(P结论:本研究进一步支持了SPC对高血压患者60个月的持续和mace的有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Intensive versus routine blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A Meta-analysis and Trial sequential analysis. Reassessing home blood pressure thresholds: clinical implications of lowering the diagnostic criteria to 130/80 mmHg. Magnesium depletion score is associated with arterial stiffness: data from the Brisighella Heart Study. Dietary modification of blood pressure-lowering effects of antihypertensive drugs - a scoping review. Association of lean body mass and fat mass with peripheral arterial disease events in hypertensive patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1