Dellaneira Setjiadi, Colin Geddes, Christian Delles
{"title":"Blood pressure measurement technique in clinical practice in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.","authors":"Dellaneira Setjiadi, Colin Geddes, Christian Delles","doi":"10.1038/s41371-024-00984-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood pressure (BP) measurement is a common procedure conducted in various disciplines and is widely available on clinical reports. The diagnosis and management of hypertension require reliable measurement of BP in outpatient clinics. Published studies suggest the standardised method for BP measurement is difficult to apply in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the current practice of BP measurement in outpatient clinics in relevant secondary care clinical specialties across the 15 separate hospital sites of the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde region (population 1.2 million) compared to the recommended standardised method. An online questionnaire was developed and disseminated to the supervising clinician of each of 268 regular outpatient clinics. The questionnaire focused on the standardised BP method (patient preparation, environment, and BP measurement technique). The questionnaire was returned for 110 clinics. 73 (66.4%) of the participating clinics measure BP routinely and these formed the basis for further analysis. 3 clinics (4.1%) apply all components of the standardised BP method. 5 (6.9%) clinics deliver advice to patients prior to clinic attendance on how to prepare for BP measurement. 61 (83.6%) of participating clinics have a dedicated quiet environment for BP measurement. 50 (68.5%) clinics always place the cuff on bare upper arm and 63.0% use a cuff size appropriate to upper arm circumference. In a wide range of secondary care out-patient clinic settings, we found that BP measurement rarely adheres to the recommended standards. This has important implications for the quality of treatment decisions that are based on BP measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-024-00984-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) measurement is a common procedure conducted in various disciplines and is widely available on clinical reports. The diagnosis and management of hypertension require reliable measurement of BP in outpatient clinics. Published studies suggest the standardised method for BP measurement is difficult to apply in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the current practice of BP measurement in outpatient clinics in relevant secondary care clinical specialties across the 15 separate hospital sites of the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde region (population 1.2 million) compared to the recommended standardised method. An online questionnaire was developed and disseminated to the supervising clinician of each of 268 regular outpatient clinics. The questionnaire focused on the standardised BP method (patient preparation, environment, and BP measurement technique). The questionnaire was returned for 110 clinics. 73 (66.4%) of the participating clinics measure BP routinely and these formed the basis for further analysis. 3 clinics (4.1%) apply all components of the standardised BP method. 5 (6.9%) clinics deliver advice to patients prior to clinic attendance on how to prepare for BP measurement. 61 (83.6%) of participating clinics have a dedicated quiet environment for BP measurement. 50 (68.5%) clinics always place the cuff on bare upper arm and 63.0% use a cuff size appropriate to upper arm circumference. In a wide range of secondary care out-patient clinic settings, we found that BP measurement rarely adheres to the recommended standards. This has important implications for the quality of treatment decisions that are based on BP measurement.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension.
The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.