Association Between Current Medical Decision-Making Participation Self-Efficacy and Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Older Adults: Baseline Findings from a Nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0106
Cheng-Pei Lin, Jung-Yu Liao, Chi-Hsien Huang, Shao-Yi Cheng, Wei-Zhe Tseng, Masanori Mori, Hsien-Cheng Chang, Chia-Ming Li, Wen-Jung Sun, Chien-Yi Wu, Hung-Yi Chiou, Sang-Ju Yu, Chao A Hsiung, Ping-Jen Chen
{"title":"Association Between Current Medical Decision-Making Participation Self-Efficacy and Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Older Adults: Baseline Findings from a Nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study.","authors":"Cheng-Pei Lin, Jung-Yu Liao, Chi-Hsien Huang, Shao-Yi Cheng, Wei-Zhe Tseng, Masanori Mori, Hsien-Cheng Chang, Chia-Ming Li, Wen-Jung Sun, Chien-Yi Wu, Hung-Yi Chiou, Sang-Ju Yu, Chao A Hsiung, Ping-Jen Chen","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> Misconceptions of and cultural differences in aging influence older adults' medical decision-making self-efficacy and engagement in advance care planning (ACP). This study aims to investigate the association between current medical decision-making participation self-efficacy and ACP engagement among older individuals receiving home-based medical care (HBMC) in Taiwan. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Baseline data analysis of a nationwide cohort study. <b><i>Setting and Participants:</i></b> Patients aged ≥50 years who had been consistently receiving HBMC for > two months between November 2019 and December 2022 were recruited. Study recruitment took place at six hospitals and 12 community home care institutions. <b><i>Measurement and Analysis:</i></b> A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, decision-making participation self-efficacy, and ACP engagement. Descriptive, stratified, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 408 HBMC recipients were enrolled (average age: 80.4 years; 55% women). The respondents reported moderate decision-making participation self-efficacy but low ACP engagement. In light of the transtheoretical model of behavior change, participants with moderate or high self-efficacy had a significantly higher chance of reaching the \"contemplation stage\" for ACP decisions (odds ratio or OR 4.06-27.13). Participants were more likely to reach the \"preparation and action stages\" for ACP decisions only when they had high self-efficacy (OR 2.76-14.73). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Although participants with better current medical decision-making self-efficacy were more likely to contemplate ACP, many did not take action beyond appointing a medical surrogate(s). Strategies to enhance decisional self-efficacy, thereby increasing timely ACP discussions among older adults in home settings in Chinese culture, are warranted. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT04250103 which has been registered on 31st January 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"50-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Misconceptions of and cultural differences in aging influence older adults' medical decision-making self-efficacy and engagement in advance care planning (ACP). This study aims to investigate the association between current medical decision-making participation self-efficacy and ACP engagement among older individuals receiving home-based medical care (HBMC) in Taiwan. Design: Baseline data analysis of a nationwide cohort study. Setting and Participants: Patients aged ≥50 years who had been consistently receiving HBMC for > two months between November 2019 and December 2022 were recruited. Study recruitment took place at six hospitals and 12 community home care institutions. Measurement and Analysis: A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, decision-making participation self-efficacy, and ACP engagement. Descriptive, stratified, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: In total, 408 HBMC recipients were enrolled (average age: 80.4 years; 55% women). The respondents reported moderate decision-making participation self-efficacy but low ACP engagement. In light of the transtheoretical model of behavior change, participants with moderate or high self-efficacy had a significantly higher chance of reaching the "contemplation stage" for ACP decisions (odds ratio or OR 4.06-27.13). Participants were more likely to reach the "preparation and action stages" for ACP decisions only when they had high self-efficacy (OR 2.76-14.73). Conclusions: Although participants with better current medical decision-making self-efficacy were more likely to contemplate ACP, many did not take action beyond appointing a medical surrogate(s). Strategies to enhance decisional self-efficacy, thereby increasing timely ACP discussions among older adults in home settings in Chinese culture, are warranted. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT04250103 which has been registered on 31st January 2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人当前医疗决策参与自我效能感与提前护理计划参与之间的关系:来自全国纵向队列研究的基线结果。
背景与目的:对老龄化的误解和文化差异影响老年人的医疗决策、自我效能感和提前护理计划(ACP)参与。摘要本研究旨在探讨台湾地区居家医疗照护老年人当前医疗决策参与自我效能感与ACP参与的关系。设计:一项全国性队列研究的基线数据分析。环境和参与者:招募年龄≥50岁,在2019年11月至2022年12月期间持续接受HBMC治疗50个月的患者。研究招募在6家医院和12家社区家庭护理机构进行。测量与分析:采用结构化问卷收集社会人口学特征、决策参与自我效能感和ACP参与的数据。进行了描述性、分层和多变量逻辑回归分析。结果:共纳入408例HBMC受者(平均年龄80.4岁;55%的女性)。被调查者的决策参与自我效能中等,但ACP投入较低。根据行为改变的跨理论模型,中等或高度自我效能的参与者在ACP决策中达到“沉思阶段”的机会显著更高(比值比or 4.06-27.13)。只有当参与者具有高自我效能时,他们才更有可能达到ACP决策的“准备和行动阶段”(OR 2.76-14.73)。结论:虽然当前医疗决策自我效能较好的参与者更有可能考虑ACP,但许多人除了指定医疗代理之外没有采取行动。提高决策自我效能的策略,从而在中国文化的家庭环境中增加及时的ACP讨论,是有必要的。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符为NCT04250103,已于2020年1月31日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
"Happy Palliversary!" Fast Facts and Concepts #531: Treatment Over Objection: A Guide for Clinicians and Surrogates. Delivering Dental Care to the Dying. The Attitudes of Health Care Professionals Toward the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Palliative Care: A Systematic Search and Narrative Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Wound Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1