Association Between Current Medical Decision-Making Participation Self-Efficacy and Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Older Adults: Baseline Findings from a Nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0106
Cheng-Pei Lin, Jung-Yu Liao, Chi-Hsien Huang, Shao-Yi Cheng, Wei-Zhe Tseng, Masanori Mori, Hsien-Cheng Chang, Chia-Ming Li, Wen-Jung Sun, Chien-Yi Wu, Hung-Yi Chiou, Sang-Ju Yu, Chao A Hsiung, Ping-Jen Chen
{"title":"Association Between Current Medical Decision-Making Participation Self-Efficacy and Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Older Adults: Baseline Findings from a Nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study.","authors":"Cheng-Pei Lin, Jung-Yu Liao, Chi-Hsien Huang, Shao-Yi Cheng, Wei-Zhe Tseng, Masanori Mori, Hsien-Cheng Chang, Chia-Ming Li, Wen-Jung Sun, Chien-Yi Wu, Hung-Yi Chiou, Sang-Ju Yu, Chao A Hsiung, Ping-Jen Chen","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> Misconceptions of and cultural differences in aging influence older adults' medical decision-making self-efficacy and engagement in advance care planning (ACP). This study aims to investigate the association between current medical decision-making participation self-efficacy and ACP engagement among older individuals receiving home-based medical care (HBMC) in Taiwan. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Baseline data analysis of a nationwide cohort study. <b><i>Setting and Participants:</i></b> Patients aged ≥50 years who had been consistently receiving HBMC for > two months between November 2019 and December 2022 were recruited. Study recruitment took place at six hospitals and 12 community home care institutions. <b><i>Measurement and Analysis:</i></b> A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, decision-making participation self-efficacy, and ACP engagement. Descriptive, stratified, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 408 HBMC recipients were enrolled (average age: 80.4 years; 55% women). The respondents reported moderate decision-making participation self-efficacy but low ACP engagement. In light of the transtheoretical model of behavior change, participants with moderate or high self-efficacy had a significantly higher chance of reaching the \"contemplation stage\" for ACP decisions (odds ratio or OR 4.06-27.13). Participants were more likely to reach the \"preparation and action stages\" for ACP decisions only when they had high self-efficacy (OR 2.76-14.73). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Although participants with better current medical decision-making self-efficacy were more likely to contemplate ACP, many did not take action beyond appointing a medical surrogate(s). Strategies to enhance decisional self-efficacy, thereby increasing timely ACP discussions among older adults in home settings in Chinese culture, are warranted. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT04250103 which has been registered on 31st January 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Misconceptions of and cultural differences in aging influence older adults' medical decision-making self-efficacy and engagement in advance care planning (ACP). This study aims to investigate the association between current medical decision-making participation self-efficacy and ACP engagement among older individuals receiving home-based medical care (HBMC) in Taiwan. Design: Baseline data analysis of a nationwide cohort study. Setting and Participants: Patients aged ≥50 years who had been consistently receiving HBMC for > two months between November 2019 and December 2022 were recruited. Study recruitment took place at six hospitals and 12 community home care institutions. Measurement and Analysis: A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, decision-making participation self-efficacy, and ACP engagement. Descriptive, stratified, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: In total, 408 HBMC recipients were enrolled (average age: 80.4 years; 55% women). The respondents reported moderate decision-making participation self-efficacy but low ACP engagement. In light of the transtheoretical model of behavior change, participants with moderate or high self-efficacy had a significantly higher chance of reaching the "contemplation stage" for ACP decisions (odds ratio or OR 4.06-27.13). Participants were more likely to reach the "preparation and action stages" for ACP decisions only when they had high self-efficacy (OR 2.76-14.73). Conclusions: Although participants with better current medical decision-making self-efficacy were more likely to contemplate ACP, many did not take action beyond appointing a medical surrogate(s). Strategies to enhance decisional self-efficacy, thereby increasing timely ACP discussions among older adults in home settings in Chinese culture, are warranted. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT04250103 which has been registered on 31st January 2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes Toward Medical Assistance in Dying Among Swedish Palliative Care Professionals. Palliative Care and Intensivists' Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care. Patterns of Specialty Palliative Consultation for Patients Admitted to Surgical Services. Letter to the Editor: "No-Shows" and Missed Opportunities: Reasons for Missed In-Person and Telehealth Appointments in an Ambulatory Palliative Care Program. What Matters to Older Native Hawaiians?: A Qualitative Study of Care Preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1