Modulation of physical exercise intensity in motor-cognitive training of adults using the SKILLCOURT technology.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.70136
Gülsa Erdogan, Bettina Karsten, Lutz Vogt, Andreas Mierau, Thorben Hülsdünker
{"title":"Modulation of physical exercise intensity in motor-cognitive training of adults using the SKILLCOURT technology.","authors":"Gülsa Erdogan, Bettina Karsten, Lutz Vogt, Andreas Mierau, Thorben Hülsdünker","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor-cognitive training and exergaming often only reach low-to-medium intensities that limits their training efficiency. This study evaluated the physiological profile of different exercises on a novel motor-cognitive training technology designed to cover a broad range of exercise intensities. Twenty-six healthy trained adults (17 males, 23.7 ± 3.8 years) performed five motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT technology. Oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR), blood [lactate], perceived physical exertion (RPE) responses, and metabolic equivalent (MET) were assessed and compared to an incremental treadmill ramp test determining the maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2max</sub>) and maximal heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>). Computer-based cognitive training served as control condition. Motor-cognitive exercises reached a higher %VO<sub>2max</sub> and %HR<sub>max</sub> levels when compared to computer-based training (p < 0.001). Average intensity varied significantly between motor-cognitive tasks, with %VO<sub>2max</sub> ranging from 22% to 81% (p < 0.001), %HR<sub>max</sub> from 49% to 89% (p < 0.001), METs from 3.57 to 13.37 (p < 0.001), blood [lactate] from 0.93 to 7.81 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup> (p < 0.001), and RPE from 8.5 to 16.4 (p < 0.001). Motor-cognitive training covers a wide range of exercise intensities. This supports individual training subscription and allows high-intensity training to facilitate cardio-vascular adaptations and neural plasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 23","pages":"e70136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11620832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor-cognitive training and exergaming often only reach low-to-medium intensities that limits their training efficiency. This study evaluated the physiological profile of different exercises on a novel motor-cognitive training technology designed to cover a broad range of exercise intensities. Twenty-six healthy trained adults (17 males, 23.7 ± 3.8 years) performed five motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT technology. Oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), blood [lactate], perceived physical exertion (RPE) responses, and metabolic equivalent (MET) were assessed and compared to an incremental treadmill ramp test determining the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and maximal heart rate (HRmax). Computer-based cognitive training served as control condition. Motor-cognitive exercises reached a higher %VO2max and %HRmax levels when compared to computer-based training (p < 0.001). Average intensity varied significantly between motor-cognitive tasks, with %VO2max ranging from 22% to 81% (p < 0.001), %HRmax from 49% to 89% (p < 0.001), METs from 3.57 to 13.37 (p < 0.001), blood [lactate] from 0.93 to 7.81 mmol·L-1 (p < 0.001), and RPE from 8.5 to 16.4 (p < 0.001). Motor-cognitive training covers a wide range of exercise intensities. This supports individual training subscription and allows high-intensity training to facilitate cardio-vascular adaptations and neural plasticity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用SKILLCOURT技术调节成人运动认知训练中的体育锻炼强度。
运动认知训练和运动训练通常只能达到低到中等强度,这限制了他们的训练效率。本研究评估了一种新的运动-认知训练技术的不同运动的生理特征,该技术旨在涵盖广泛的运动强度。26名健康成人(17名男性,23.7±3.8岁)在SKILLCOURT技术上完成了5项运动认知训练任务。评估耗氧量(VO2)、心率(HR)、血[乳酸]、感知体力消耗(RPE)反应和代谢当量(MET),并与确定最大耗氧量(VO2max)和最大心率(HRmax)的增量跑步机斜坡试验进行比较。计算机认知训练作为对照条件。与基于计算机的训练相比,运动认知训练达到了更高的%VO2max和%HRmax水平(p 2max从22%到81% (p max从49%到89% (p -1))
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
Associations between circulating amino acids and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in individuals living with severe obesity. Expression and function of Connexin 43 and Connexin 37 in the murine zona glomerulosa. Prolonged sitting is not associated with altered shear-mediated dilation of the internal carotid artery, despite impairing lower limb endothelial function. Quantification of training-induced alterations in body composition via automated machine learning analysis of MRI images in the thigh region: A pilot study in young females. Pemafibrate ameliorates renal injury through induction of FGF21 and ketone body production in male mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1