Disaster preparedness for intensive care units: Priorities to inform crisis standards of care

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101142
David Sellers RN, MCritCareNursing , Julia Crilly RN, PhD , Lynda Hughes RN, PhD , Jamie Ranse RN, PhD
{"title":"Disaster preparedness for intensive care units: Priorities to inform crisis standards of care","authors":"David Sellers RN, MCritCareNursing ,&nbsp;Julia Crilly RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Lynda Hughes RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Jamie Ranse RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The number of disasters occurring globally is increasing. Natural hazards, changing geopolitical situations, and increasing population densities may lead to an increased likelihood of a surge of patients requiring health care, some of whom might be requiring intensive care–level treatment. There is a dearth of literature on intensive care unit (ICU) practitioner's priorities regarding disaster preparedness and crisis standards of care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to understand what nurses working in ICUs within Australia prioritise regarding ICU disaster preparedness and the implementation of crisis standards of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A modified three-round Delphi design was used for this study. A snowballing recruitment method facilitated the purposive sampling of ICU nurses, starting with members of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses. Eligible participants were asked to rate statements according to their priorities when addressing disaster preparedness of the Australian ICU in which they work. Statements that achieved the 10 highest scores in the final round were tabulated to indicate the broader areas of disaster preparedness that the respondents considered priorities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16 participants completed both round two and round three of this Delphi study. Out of 38 statements across six domains, 33 statements achieved consensus. Healthcare practitioner protection, wellbeing, and the management of space populated the top 10 priorities. These priorities included adequate personal protection equipment, services to support healthcare practitioners, and clear communication and debriefing pathways. Another key priority identified was the need for a clear plan on how the ICU footprint will expand to accommodate a surge of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Healthcare practitioner wellbeing followed by adequate plans for ICU expansion are key priorities of nursing staff working in ICUs within Australia. Understanding the priorities of those who work in the ICU gives a pragmatic insight into what is required to further develop the disaster preparedness of Australian ICUs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 101142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424002935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The number of disasters occurring globally is increasing. Natural hazards, changing geopolitical situations, and increasing population densities may lead to an increased likelihood of a surge of patients requiring health care, some of whom might be requiring intensive care–level treatment. There is a dearth of literature on intensive care unit (ICU) practitioner's priorities regarding disaster preparedness and crisis standards of care.

Objectives

This study aimed to understand what nurses working in ICUs within Australia prioritise regarding ICU disaster preparedness and the implementation of crisis standards of care.

Methods

A modified three-round Delphi design was used for this study. A snowballing recruitment method facilitated the purposive sampling of ICU nurses, starting with members of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses. Eligible participants were asked to rate statements according to their priorities when addressing disaster preparedness of the Australian ICU in which they work. Statements that achieved the 10 highest scores in the final round were tabulated to indicate the broader areas of disaster preparedness that the respondents considered priorities.

Results

A total of 16 participants completed both round two and round three of this Delphi study. Out of 38 statements across six domains, 33 statements achieved consensus. Healthcare practitioner protection, wellbeing, and the management of space populated the top 10 priorities. These priorities included adequate personal protection equipment, services to support healthcare practitioners, and clear communication and debriefing pathways. Another key priority identified was the need for a clear plan on how the ICU footprint will expand to accommodate a surge of patients.

Conclusion

Healthcare practitioner wellbeing followed by adequate plans for ICU expansion are key priorities of nursing staff working in ICUs within Australia. Understanding the priorities of those who work in the ICU gives a pragmatic insight into what is required to further develop the disaster preparedness of Australian ICUs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房的备灾:告知危机护理标准的优先事项。
背景:全球发生的灾害数量正在增加。自然灾害、不断变化的地缘政治局势和不断增加的人口密度可能导致需要医疗保健的患者激增的可能性增加,其中一些人可能需要重症监护级别的治疗。关于重症监护室(ICU)从业者关于备灾和危机护理标准的优先事项的文献缺乏。目的:本研究旨在了解在澳大利亚ICU工作的护士在ICU备灾和实施危机护理标准方面的优先事项。方法:采用改进的三轮德尔菲设计。滚雪球式的招募方法促进了ICU护士的有目的抽样,从澳大利亚重症监护护士学院的成员开始。符合条件的参与者被要求根据他们在澳大利亚ICU工作时解决备灾问题的优先级对陈述进行评级。在最后一轮中获得10个最高分的陈述被制成表格,以表明答复者认为优先考虑的更广泛的备灾领域。结果:共有16名参与者完成了本德尔菲研究的第二轮和第三轮。在6个领域的38项声明中,33项达成了共识。医疗从业者的保护、福利和空间管理占据了前10个优先事项。这些优先事项包括充足的个人防护设备、支持医疗从业人员的服务以及明确的沟通和汇报途径。确定的另一个关键优先事项是需要制定一个明确的计划,说明如何扩大ICU的覆盖范围以容纳激增的患者。结论:保健从业者的福祉,以及适当的ICU扩展计划是澳大利亚ICU护理人员工作的关键优先事项。了解重症监护病房工作人员的优先事项,可以务实地了解进一步发展澳大利亚重症监护病房备灾所需的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and variability in use of physical restraints in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effects of prophylactic non-invasive ventilation on weaning: A systematic review with meta-analysis Harnessing machine learning for predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation: A systematic review Multicentre prospective study to establish a risk prediction model on pressure injury in the neonatal intensive and intermediate care units Effects of compassion fatigue, structural empowerment, and psychological empowerment on the caring behaviours of intensive care unit nurses in China: A structural equation modelling analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1