Prenatal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Anorectal Malformations: Correlating Prenatal Signs With Postnatal Outcomes.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1002/pd.6723
D Huijgen, H P Versteegh, R M H Wijnen, S Galjaard, N C J Peters, C E J Sloots
{"title":"Prenatal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Anorectal Malformations: Correlating Prenatal Signs With Postnatal Outcomes.","authors":"D Huijgen, H P Versteegh, R M H Wijnen, S Galjaard, N C J Peters, C E J Sloots","doi":"10.1002/pd.6723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored prenatal ultrasound markers in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients treated for ARM in our institution from January 2014 to December 2021 with an available expert fetal anomaly scan (eFAS) were reviewed. The eFAS images were assessed to evaluate the fetal anus, specifically by identifying hyperechoic anal mucosa surrounded by hypoechoic anal sphincter, referred to as \"target sign\" (TS). Furthermore, indirect signs of ARM were assessed and correlated with postnatal clinical symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 115 patients treated for ARM, 32 mothers underwent eFAS. TS was assessed in 22 fetuses, of which 17 (77.3%) had an absent or abnormal TS. Of the patients with a postnatally confirmed complex type of ARM, 90% had an absent or abnormal TS. One or more indirect signs of ARM were found in 16 out of 32 fetuses (50.0%), comprising echogenic bowel (n = 3), echogenic meconium (n = 2), dilated intestines (n = 7), echo-lucent cavity behind the urinary bladder (n = 4), abnormal external genitalia (n = 6), and polyhydramnios (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective cohort study provides valuable insights into the potential role of TS assessment and indirect signs in the prenatal diagnosis of ARM. Future studies should further validate our findings and elicit whether TS assessment should be incorporated into prenatal screening protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored prenatal ultrasound markers in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs).

Methods: All patients treated for ARM in our institution from January 2014 to December 2021 with an available expert fetal anomaly scan (eFAS) were reviewed. The eFAS images were assessed to evaluate the fetal anus, specifically by identifying hyperechoic anal mucosa surrounded by hypoechoic anal sphincter, referred to as "target sign" (TS). Furthermore, indirect signs of ARM were assessed and correlated with postnatal clinical symptoms.

Results: Of the 115 patients treated for ARM, 32 mothers underwent eFAS. TS was assessed in 22 fetuses, of which 17 (77.3%) had an absent or abnormal TS. Of the patients with a postnatally confirmed complex type of ARM, 90% had an absent or abnormal TS. One or more indirect signs of ARM were found in 16 out of 32 fetuses (50.0%), comprising echogenic bowel (n = 3), echogenic meconium (n = 2), dilated intestines (n = 7), echo-lucent cavity behind the urinary bladder (n = 4), abnormal external genitalia (n = 6), and polyhydramnios (n = 5).

Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study provides valuable insights into the potential role of TS assessment and indirect signs in the prenatal diagnosis of ARM. Future studies should further validate our findings and elicit whether TS assessment should be incorporated into prenatal screening protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前超声诊断肛肠畸形:产前体征与产后结局的相关性。
目的:探讨肛肠畸形(ARMs)患者的产前超声标志物。方法:回顾2014年1月至2021年12月在我院接受专家胎儿异常扫描(eFAS)治疗的所有ARM患者。评估eFAS图像以评估胎儿肛门,特别是通过识别被低回声肛门括约肌包围的高回声肛门粘膜,称为“目标征象”(TS)。此外,评估了间接体征,并将其与产后临床症状相关联。结果:在115例接受ARM治疗的患者中,32名母亲接受了eFAS。TS是评估胎儿在22个,其中17(77.3%)有一个缺失或异常的TS。确诊的患者后天复杂类型的手臂,90%有缺失或异常的TS。一个或多个间接手臂的迹象被发现在16个32的胎儿(50.0%),包括回波的肠(n = 3),反射波的胎便(n = 2),扩张肠(n = 7)、echo-lucent腔在膀胱(n = 4),外生殖器异常(n = 6),和羊水过多(n = 5) .Conclusion:这项回顾性队列研究为TS评估和间接体征在ARM产前诊断中的潜在作用提供了有价值的见解。未来的研究将进一步验证我们的发现,并引出是否应该将TS评估纳入产前筛查方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Fetal Urinoma Secondary to Posterior Urethral Valve and Its Association to Postnatal Renal Function: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Challenges in Identifying the Cause of Fetal Sinus Bradycardia: Coexistence of Maternal Anti-SSA Antibodies and Holt-Oram Syndrome Due to a Novel TBX5 Variant. The Intersection Between Genetic Reproductive Carrier Screening and Genomic Newborn Screening: Implications for Clinical Practice. Exome sequencing in every pregnancy? Results of trio exome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses. Prenatal exome sequencing for the morphologically normal fetus: Should we be doing it?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1