Quality and Consistency of Rhinoplasty Photos on Social Media: Prevalence of Potentially Misleading Before-and-After Images.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2024.0232
Shervin Eskandari, Mitesh Mehta, Anita Sethna, David W Chou
{"title":"Quality and Consistency of Rhinoplasty Photos on Social Media: Prevalence of Potentially Misleading Before-and-After Images.","authors":"Shervin Eskandari, Mitesh Mehta, Anita Sethna, David W Chou","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> There is significant variability in how rhinoplasty results are presented on social media. This study aims to evaluate the quality and consistency of preoperative and postoperative rhinoplasty photos on the social media platform Instagram. <b>Methods:</b> Instagram was queried on April 4, 2024 using the search term #rhinoplastybeforeandafter. Posts meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed for inconsistencies in background, makeup, use of personal photo, and variations in face size between preoperative and postoperative images. Account demographics and time since surgery were also noted. <b>Results:</b> A total of 888 sets of before-and-after rhinoplasty photos were included, with nearly all (<i>n</i> = 882) posted by surgeon accounts. Of the posts analyzed, 23.7% had a ≥10% face size discrepancy, and 5.1% had a ≥10% face rotation discrepancy. Only 35.7% of posts were considered \"high quality,\" with no significant photo discrepancies between postop and preop images and with postoperative time interval reported. <b>Conclusion:</b> Instagram before-and-after rhinoplasty photos evaluated in this study exhibited significant heterogeneity in quality and consistency regarding image background, image source, face size, face rotation, and brightness. Surgeons should prioritize consistency between preoperative and postoperative photos when sharing their results to minimize the potential for misleading the public.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is significant variability in how rhinoplasty results are presented on social media. This study aims to evaluate the quality and consistency of preoperative and postoperative rhinoplasty photos on the social media platform Instagram. Methods: Instagram was queried on April 4, 2024 using the search term #rhinoplastybeforeandafter. Posts meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed for inconsistencies in background, makeup, use of personal photo, and variations in face size between preoperative and postoperative images. Account demographics and time since surgery were also noted. Results: A total of 888 sets of before-and-after rhinoplasty photos were included, with nearly all (n = 882) posted by surgeon accounts. Of the posts analyzed, 23.7% had a ≥10% face size discrepancy, and 5.1% had a ≥10% face rotation discrepancy. Only 35.7% of posts were considered "high quality," with no significant photo discrepancies between postop and preop images and with postoperative time interval reported. Conclusion: Instagram before-and-after rhinoplasty photos evaluated in this study exhibited significant heterogeneity in quality and consistency regarding image background, image source, face size, face rotation, and brightness. Surgeons should prioritize consistency between preoperative and postoperative photos when sharing their results to minimize the potential for misleading the public.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体上鼻整形照片的质量和一致性:可能误导前后图像的流行
导言:在社交媒体上展示隆鼻手术结果的方式有很大的差异。本研究旨在评估社交媒体平台Instagram上隆鼻手术术前和术后照片的质量和一致性。方法:在2024年4月4日使用搜索词# rhinoplasty前后在Instagram上进行查询。分析符合我们纳入标准的帖子在背景、化妆、个人照片的使用以及术前和术后图像之间面部大小的变化方面的不一致。还记录了账户人口统计数据和手术后的时间。结果:共纳入888组鼻整形前后照片,几乎全部(n = 882)由外科医生账号发布。在分析的帖子中,23.7%的帖子面部尺寸差异≥10%,5.1%的帖子面部旋转差异≥10%。只有35.7%的帖子被认为是“高质量的”,在手术后和术前的图像和术后时间间隔之间没有明显的照片差异。结论:本研究评估的Instagram隆鼻前后照片在图像背景、图像来源、面部大小、面部旋转和亮度方面的质量和一致性存在显著的异质性。外科医生在分享手术结果时应优先考虑术前和术后照片的一致性,以尽量减少误导公众的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Association Between Symptoms of Body Dysmorphia and Social Media Usage: A Cross-Generational Comparison. Maximizing Septal Cartilage and Bone Harvest for Autologous Nasal Septal Grafts in Congenital Cleft Nasal Deformity. Bell's Palsy-Unclear Terminology and Definitions Impede Progress. Dorsal Hump Reduction and Keystone Injury in Human Anatomic Specimens. Effectiveness of Isotretinoin Administration in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1