Is shared decision making an aspect of palliative care integration? An observation of collaboration between oncologists and palliative care professionals.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01608-y
Morgane Plançon, Ashley Ridley, Kristopher Lamore, Andréa Tarot, Alexis Burnod, François Blot, Isabelle Colombet
{"title":"Is shared decision making an aspect of palliative care integration? An observation of collaboration between oncologists and palliative care professionals.","authors":"Morgane Plançon, Ashley Ridley, Kristopher Lamore, Andréa Tarot, Alexis Burnod, François Blot, Isabelle Colombet","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01608-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early palliative care interventions in oncology, as recommended by international oncology societies, promote patient understanding and support decision-making. At the same time, shared decision-making models are being developed to enhance patient participation as part of a new model of patient-physician relationship. For patients with palliative needs, this participation is essential and helps to avoid futile and aggressive treatments at the end of life. The aim of this study is to observe decision making during meetings between oncology and palliative care professionals, focusing particularly on the components of shared decision-making models, but also on the role played by palliative care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a non-participant observation of multidisciplinary meetings and outpatient clinic activities in two Comprehensive Cancer Centres in France. Field notes were then coded using thematic content analysis. Deductive analysis was conducted using the observation grid developed from Elwyn's three-talk model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only a few elements of the different models of shared decision-making are apparent in the multidisciplinary meetings. Palliative care professionals emphasise the importance of involving patients and providing them with information about the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options. However, patient involvement in decision-making remains difficult in daily practice. Decisions to discontinue oncological treatment are often driven by clinical and biological signs of terminal evolution rather than shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are still cultural and organisational barriers to actual implementation of early integrated onco-palliative care. Promotion of shared decision making can be a strong lever of change which is frequently mobilised by palliative care teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01608-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early palliative care interventions in oncology, as recommended by international oncology societies, promote patient understanding and support decision-making. At the same time, shared decision-making models are being developed to enhance patient participation as part of a new model of patient-physician relationship. For patients with palliative needs, this participation is essential and helps to avoid futile and aggressive treatments at the end of life. The aim of this study is to observe decision making during meetings between oncology and palliative care professionals, focusing particularly on the components of shared decision-making models, but also on the role played by palliative care professionals.

Methods: We conducted a non-participant observation of multidisciplinary meetings and outpatient clinic activities in two Comprehensive Cancer Centres in France. Field notes were then coded using thematic content analysis. Deductive analysis was conducted using the observation grid developed from Elwyn's three-talk model.

Results: Only a few elements of the different models of shared decision-making are apparent in the multidisciplinary meetings. Palliative care professionals emphasise the importance of involving patients and providing them with information about the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options. However, patient involvement in decision-making remains difficult in daily practice. Decisions to discontinue oncological treatment are often driven by clinical and biological signs of terminal evolution rather than shared decision-making.

Conclusions: There are still cultural and organisational barriers to actual implementation of early integrated onco-palliative care. Promotion of shared decision making can be a strong lever of change which is frequently mobilised by palliative care teams.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同决策是姑息治疗整合的一个方面吗?肿瘤学家与姑息治疗专业人员合作的观察。
背景:肿瘤早期姑息治疗干预,作为国际肿瘤学会推荐,促进患者的理解和支持决策。与此同时,作为医患关系新模式的一部分,正在开发共享决策模式,以提高患者的参与。对于有姑息治疗需求的患者,这种参与是必不可少的,有助于避免在生命结束时进行无效和积极的治疗。本研究的目的是观察肿瘤学和姑息治疗专业人员在会议期间的决策,特别关注共享决策模型的组成部分,以及姑息治疗专业人员所扮演的角色。方法:我们对法国两家综合癌症中心的多学科会议和门诊活动进行了非参与者观察。然后使用主题内容分析对现场记录进行编码。利用Elwyn三语模型发展的观测网格进行演绎分析。结果:在多学科会议中,共享决策的不同模型中只有少数元素是明显的。姑息治疗专业人员强调让患者参与并向他们提供不同治疗方案的优缺点信息的重要性。然而,在日常实践中,患者参与决策仍然很困难。停止肿瘤治疗的决定往往是由临床和生物学的终末期进化的迹象驱动的,而不是共同的决策。结论:早期综合姑息治疗的实际实施仍然存在文化和组织障碍。促进共同决策可以是一个强有力的变革杠杆,姑息治疗团队经常动员这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
A safety risk assessment checklist for personalized exercise as early supportive care in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a modified Delphi consensus study. Causes of early hospital readmission in hospice patients at a comprehensive oncology center in Jordan: a retrospective descriptive study. Healthcare professionals' experiences of delivering palliative and end-of-life care in ethnically diverse communities: a qualitative study. Building a presence: implementation strategies used to expand palliative care services across six diverse health systems in a longitudinal mixed methods study. Criteria for referral to a hospital palliative care team in a cancer setting: a Delphi study of oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1