Infants' Knowledge of Individual Words: Investigating Links Between Parent Report and Looking Time

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infancy Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/infa.12641
Melanie López Pérez, Charlotte Moore, Andrea Sander-Montant, Krista Byers-Heinlein
{"title":"Infants' Knowledge of Individual Words: Investigating Links Between Parent Report and Looking Time","authors":"Melanie López Pérez,&nbsp;Charlotte Moore,&nbsp;Andrea Sander-Montant,&nbsp;Krista Byers-Heinlein","doi":"10.1111/infa.12641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assessing early vocabulary development commonly involves parent report methods and behavioral tasks like looking-while-listening. While both yield reliable aggregate scores, findings are mixed regarding their reliability in measuring infants' knowledge of individual words. Using archival data from 126 monolingual and bilingual 14–31-month-olds, we further examined links across these methods at the word level, while controlling for potentially confounding child-level factors. When data were averaged at the child level, performance on the looking-while-listening task correlated well with parent-reported word production of the same words, as expected. However, mixed-effects model comparisons suggested that at the word level, looking-while-listening performance was significantly predicted by age and total productive vocabulary, but not by parent-reported knowledge of a word once these factors were controlled for. These findings invite careful consideration regarding the adequacy of these two popular methods for capturing children's idiosyncratic knowledge of individual words.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing early vocabulary development commonly involves parent report methods and behavioral tasks like looking-while-listening. While both yield reliable aggregate scores, findings are mixed regarding their reliability in measuring infants' knowledge of individual words. Using archival data from 126 monolingual and bilingual 14–31-month-olds, we further examined links across these methods at the word level, while controlling for potentially confounding child-level factors. When data were averaged at the child level, performance on the looking-while-listening task correlated well with parent-reported word production of the same words, as expected. However, mixed-effects model comparisons suggested that at the word level, looking-while-listening performance was significantly predicted by age and total productive vocabulary, but not by parent-reported knowledge of a word once these factors were controlled for. These findings invite careful consideration regarding the adequacy of these two popular methods for capturing children's idiosyncratic knowledge of individual words.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿单字知识:父母报告与注视时间的关系研究。
评估早期词汇发展通常包括家长报告方法和像边听边看这样的行为任务。虽然这两种方法都能得出可靠的综合分数,但在测量婴儿对单个单词知识的可靠性方面,结果却不尽相同。利用126名14-31个月大的单语和双语婴儿的档案数据,我们进一步研究了这些方法在单词水平上的联系,同时控制了潜在的混淆儿童水平的因素。当数据在儿童水平上平均时,正如预期的那样,在“边听边看”任务中的表现与父母报告的相同单词的单词生成量密切相关。然而,混合效应模型的比较表明,在单词水平上,“边听边看”的表现与年龄和总有效词汇量显著相关,但一旦这些因素得到控制,则与父母报告的单词知识无关。这些发现需要仔细考虑这两种流行的方法是否足够,以捕捉儿童对单个单词的特殊知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
期刊最新文献
The Dynamics of Looking and Smiling Differ for Young Infants at Elevated Likelihood for ASD. The Association of Spousal Relationship Quality and Social Support With Maternal-Infant Bonding: Moderating Roles of Maternal Age and Paternal Occupation. The Active Infant's Developing Role in Musical Interactions: Insights From an Online Parent Questionnaire. Cultural Differences in Visual Attention Emerge in Infancy. Emotional Movement Kinematics Guide Twelve-Month-Olds' Visual, but Not Manual, Exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1