{"title":"Cancer Rehabilitation: Reconsidering the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Classification Criteria for Payment Under the Prospective Payment System.","authors":"Patricia L Geels, Kieran J Fogarty","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) are crucial in enhancing the functionality of individuals requiring post-acute care. However, despite modifications in reimbursement systems, IRF admission criteria have remained relatively unchanged since the 1970s. As a result, and despite evidence of functional improvement, IRFs are still not widely used for cancer patients' rehabilitation needs. President Biden relaunched the Cancer Moonshot in 2022 with the aim of enhancing the quality of life for individuals with cancer. To improve the quality of life for cancer patients and meet their rehabilitation needs, it is essential to assess IRF admission and reimbursement procedures. Utilizing Bardach's Eightfold Path for Policy Analysis, the so-called \"60% rule,\" and potential alternatives are evaluated to address the impact on cancer patients' access to IRF-level rehabilitation. Expanding the list of conditions eligible for IRF-level care could significantly increase access for those with a cancer diagnosis with minimal legislative intervention. This approach could also enhance the efficiency of these services by enabling providers to become more attuned to the unique needs of cancer patients. Although this may entail higher costs initially, long-term savings can be realized through reduced disability costs and improved quality of life for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 4","pages":"302-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) are crucial in enhancing the functionality of individuals requiring post-acute care. However, despite modifications in reimbursement systems, IRF admission criteria have remained relatively unchanged since the 1970s. As a result, and despite evidence of functional improvement, IRFs are still not widely used for cancer patients' rehabilitation needs. President Biden relaunched the Cancer Moonshot in 2022 with the aim of enhancing the quality of life for individuals with cancer. To improve the quality of life for cancer patients and meet their rehabilitation needs, it is essential to assess IRF admission and reimbursement procedures. Utilizing Bardach's Eightfold Path for Policy Analysis, the so-called "60% rule," and potential alternatives are evaluated to address the impact on cancer patients' access to IRF-level rehabilitation. Expanding the list of conditions eligible for IRF-level care could significantly increase access for those with a cancer diagnosis with minimal legislative intervention. This approach could also enhance the efficiency of these services by enabling providers to become more attuned to the unique needs of cancer patients. Although this may entail higher costs initially, long-term savings can be realized through reduced disability costs and improved quality of life for patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.