Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6
Vladimir Shnaydman
{"title":"Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring.","authors":"Vladimir Shnaydman","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the high-stakes world of clinical trials, where a company's multimillion-dollar drug development investment is at risk, the increasing complexity of these trials only compounds the challenges. Therefore, the development of a robust risk mitigation strategy, as a crucial component of comprehensive risk planning, is not just important but essential for effective drug development, particularly in the RBQM (Risk-Based Quality Management) ecosystem and its component-RBM (Risk-Based Monitoring). This emphasis on the urgency and significance of risk mitigation strategy can help the audience understand the gravity of the topic. The paper introduces a novel modeling framework for deriving an efficient risk mitigation strategy at the planning stage of a clinical trial and establishing operational rules (thresholds) under the assumption that contingency resources are limited. The problem is solved in two steps: (1) Deriving a contingency budget and its efficient allocation across risks to be mitigated and (2) Deriving operational rules to be aligned with risk assessment and contingency resources. This approach is based on combining optimization and simulation models. The optimization model aims to derive an efficient contingency budget and allocate limited mitigation resources across mitigated risks. The simulation model aims to efficiently position each risk's QTL/KRI (Quality Tolerance Limits/Key Risk Indicators at a clinical trial level) and Secondary Limit thresholds. A case study illustrates the proposed technique's practical application and effectiveness. This example demonstrates the framework's potential and instills confidence in its successful implementation, reassuring the audience of its practicality and usefulness. The paper is structured as follows. (1) Introduction; (2) Methodology; (3) Models-Risk Optimizer and Risk Simulator; (4) Case study; (5) Discussion and (6) Conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"173-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the high-stakes world of clinical trials, where a company's multimillion-dollar drug development investment is at risk, the increasing complexity of these trials only compounds the challenges. Therefore, the development of a robust risk mitigation strategy, as a crucial component of comprehensive risk planning, is not just important but essential for effective drug development, particularly in the RBQM (Risk-Based Quality Management) ecosystem and its component-RBM (Risk-Based Monitoring). This emphasis on the urgency and significance of risk mitigation strategy can help the audience understand the gravity of the topic. The paper introduces a novel modeling framework for deriving an efficient risk mitigation strategy at the planning stage of a clinical trial and establishing operational rules (thresholds) under the assumption that contingency resources are limited. The problem is solved in two steps: (1) Deriving a contingency budget and its efficient allocation across risks to be mitigated and (2) Deriving operational rules to be aligned with risk assessment and contingency resources. This approach is based on combining optimization and simulation models. The optimization model aims to derive an efficient contingency budget and allocate limited mitigation resources across mitigated risks. The simulation model aims to efficiently position each risk's QTL/KRI (Quality Tolerance Limits/Key Risk Indicators at a clinical trial level) and Secondary Limit thresholds. A case study illustrates the proposed technique's practical application and effectiveness. This example demonstrates the framework's potential and instills confidence in its successful implementation, reassuring the audience of its practicality and usefulness. The paper is structured as follows. (1) Introduction; (2) Methodology; (3) Models-Risk Optimizer and Risk Simulator; (4) Case study; (5) Discussion and (6) Conclusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险监测的临床试验中QTL和二次限制阈值的有效定位。
在高风险的临床试验领域,一家公司数百万美元的药物开发投资面临风险,而这些试验越来越复杂,只会加剧挑战。因此,作为全面风险规划的一个关键组成部分,制定强有力的风险缓解战略不仅重要,而且对于有效的药物开发至关重要,特别是在基于风险的质量管理(RBQM)生态系统及其组成部分——基于风险的监测(rbm)中。强调风险缓解战略的紧迫性和重要性,有助于听众理解这一主题的严重性。本文介绍了一种新的建模框架,用于在假设应急资源有限的情况下,在临床试验的规划阶段推导有效的风险缓解策略并建立操作规则(阈值)。该问题的解决分为两个步骤:(1)获得应急预算并有效分配所要减轻的风险;(2)获得与风险评估和应急资源相一致的操作规则。该方法是基于优化和仿真模型相结合的方法。该优化模型旨在推导出有效的应急预算,并将有限的缓解资源分配给缓解的风险。该模拟模型旨在有效定位每种风险的QTL/KRI(临床试验水平的质量容忍极限/关键风险指标)和次级极限阈值。实例分析表明了该技术的实际应用和有效性。这个例子展示了框架的潜力,并为它的成功实现注入了信心,向受众保证了它的实用性和有用性。本文的结构如下。(1)介绍;(2)方法;(3)模型——风险优化器和风险模拟器;(4)案例研究;(5)讨论(6)结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Impact of Rule 11 on the European Medical Software Landscape: Analysis of EUDAMED and Further Databases Three Years After MDR Implementation. Basic Considerations for Data Pooling Strategy in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials (MRCTs). Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development by Overcoming Existing Differences in Regional Regulatory Requirements - Outcomes of a Descriptive Review. A Consistent Lack of Consistency: Definitions, Evidentiary Expectations and Potential Use of Meaningful Change Data in Clinical Outcome Assessments Across Stakeholders. Results from a DIA Working Group Literature Review and Survey. A Five-Year Analysis of Market Share and Sales Growth for Original Drugs after Patent Expiration in Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1