Promoting Professional Behaviors and Attitudes in Healthcare Students: A Systematic Review.

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Seth J Kress, Kent E Irwin, Elizabeth Campione, Kathy D Hall
{"title":"Promoting Professional Behaviors and Attitudes in Healthcare Students: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Seth J Kress, Kent E Irwin, Elizabeth Campione, Kathy D Hall","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/background: </strong>The development of professionalism among healthcare students is challenging because these skills are complex concepts rather than technical skills. The purposes of this systematic review were to investigate: 1) the teaching methods used to promote the development of professionalism and 2) the effectiveness of the teaching methods found.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched healthcare and educational databases. Of 4,371 articles identified, we included 54. The variables of interest included teaching methods and professionalism outcomes in physical therapy, medicine, occupational therapy, nursing, dentistry, and pharmacy education. Two reviewers independently screened each title, abstract, and full-text article to determine if inclusion and exclusion criteria were met.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quality appraisal of the studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We identified 12 teaching methods. The 3 most used teaching methods were self-assessment/reflection, group discus-sion, and lecture. The teaching methods were frequently used in combination. An assessment of study outcomes showed overall, 89% of the studies resulted in positive changes in professional behaviors or attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teaching methods promoting the development of professional behaviors and attitudes in healthcare students commonly use a combination of methods. This systematic review offers healthcare educators evidence-based options for facilitating growth of professional behaviors and attitudes in students.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 4","pages":"308-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/background: The development of professionalism among healthcare students is challenging because these skills are complex concepts rather than technical skills. The purposes of this systematic review were to investigate: 1) the teaching methods used to promote the development of professionalism and 2) the effectiveness of the teaching methods found.

Methods: We searched healthcare and educational databases. Of 4,371 articles identified, we included 54. The variables of interest included teaching methods and professionalism outcomes in physical therapy, medicine, occupational therapy, nursing, dentistry, and pharmacy education. Two reviewers independently screened each title, abstract, and full-text article to determine if inclusion and exclusion criteria were met.

Results: The quality appraisal of the studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We identified 12 teaching methods. The 3 most used teaching methods were self-assessment/reflection, group discus-sion, and lecture. The teaching methods were frequently used in combination. An assessment of study outcomes showed overall, 89% of the studies resulted in positive changes in professional behaviors or attitudes.

Conclusions: Teaching methods promoting the development of professional behaviors and attitudes in healthcare students commonly use a combination of methods. This systematic review offers healthcare educators evidence-based options for facilitating growth of professional behaviors and attitudes in students.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进医疗保健学生的专业行为和态度:系统回顾。
目的/背景:保健专业学生的专业发展具有挑战性,因为这些技能是复杂的概念,而不是技术技能。本系统回顾的目的是调查:1)促进专业发展的教学方法;2)发现的教学方法的有效性。方法:检索卫生保健和教育数据库。在4371篇文献中,我们纳入了54篇。感兴趣的变量包括物理治疗、医学、职业治疗、护理、牙科和药学教育的教学方法和专业成果。两名审稿人独立筛选每篇标题、摘要和全文,以确定是否符合纳入和排除标准。结果:采用混合方法评价工具对研究进行质量评价。我们确定了12种教学方法。最常用的三种教学方法是自我评估/反思、小组讨论和讲座。两种教学方法经常结合使用。对研究结果的评估显示,总体而言,89%的研究导致了职业行为或态度的积极变化。结论:促进卫生保健专业学生职业行为态度发展的教学方法多采用综合方法。本系统综述为促进学生专业行为和态度的成长提供了医疗保健教育工作者基于证据的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Education Intervention: A Pilot Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a Brief, Self-Paced Intervention to Prevent Burnout in Physician Assistant Students. Allied Health Collaborative Practice Capability: A Coalescence of Capabilities. Demonstrating the Hallmarks of Gynecologic Malignancies by Translating Radiation Therapy Theory to Clinical Practice: A Student and Mentor Perspective. Factors Contributing to Physical Therapist Attrition: A Qualitative Study. How Do Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Perceive the Title Change from Physician Assistant to Physician Associate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1