Safety Net Spending on Children and the Sources of Household Income Across U.S. States, 1997-2016.

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Demography Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1215/00703370-11694711
Margot I Jackson, Christopher Wimer, Chloe Zilkha
{"title":"Safety Net Spending on Children and the Sources of Household Income Across U.S. States, 1997-2016.","authors":"Margot I Jackson, Christopher Wimer, Chloe Zilkha","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11694711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High levels of poverty and economic precarity in the United States relative to other countries have led to academic and policy debates about whether welfare state investments accomplish what they are intended to. Although social safety net spending clearly has antipoverty effects at the national level, there is scant evidence on the \"resource pathway\" presumed to underlie the effects of the local welfare state on families with children. Which types of public investments have especially contributed to the total resources of households with children? Understanding this question at the state level is important, given dramatic variation in states' safety net spending on children and the rise of federalism, which increases state autonomy in designing and administering social programs. Using annual data from the 1997-2016 State-by-State Spending on Kids Dataset linked to data from the Census Bureau's Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey, we examine the relationship between transfer spending in states and household income sources. Findings suggest that government transfers raise the total income of households with the lowest income and educational levels and that transfer income among these households is more multidimensional than among higher resource households. Further, analyses using variation within and across states demonstrate that state-level spending in each area is associated with an increase in corresponding transfer income among non-college-educated households and those in the bottom half of the income distribution; such spending is associated with no increase (or a decrease) in transfer income among college-educated households and those in the top quarter of the income distribution. These results suggest that increases in state-level spending disproportionately benefit the budgets of households with the lowest resources and might be a promising means to reduce resource gaps between households.</p>","PeriodicalId":48394,"journal":{"name":"Demography","volume":" ","pages":"2081-2105"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11694711","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High levels of poverty and economic precarity in the United States relative to other countries have led to academic and policy debates about whether welfare state investments accomplish what they are intended to. Although social safety net spending clearly has antipoverty effects at the national level, there is scant evidence on the "resource pathway" presumed to underlie the effects of the local welfare state on families with children. Which types of public investments have especially contributed to the total resources of households with children? Understanding this question at the state level is important, given dramatic variation in states' safety net spending on children and the rise of federalism, which increases state autonomy in designing and administering social programs. Using annual data from the 1997-2016 State-by-State Spending on Kids Dataset linked to data from the Census Bureau's Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey, we examine the relationship between transfer spending in states and household income sources. Findings suggest that government transfers raise the total income of households with the lowest income and educational levels and that transfer income among these households is more multidimensional than among higher resource households. Further, analyses using variation within and across states demonstrate that state-level spending in each area is associated with an increase in corresponding transfer income among non-college-educated households and those in the bottom half of the income distribution; such spending is associated with no increase (or a decrease) in transfer income among college-educated households and those in the top quarter of the income distribution. These results suggest that increases in state-level spending disproportionately benefit the budgets of households with the lowest resources and might be a promising means to reduce resource gaps between households.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1997-2016年美国各州儿童安全网支出与家庭收入来源。
与其他国家相比,美国的高贫困率和经济不稳定性引发了关于福利国家投资是否实现其预期目标的学术和政策辩论。虽然社会安全网支出在国家层面上明显具有反贫困效果,但关于“资源途径”的证据却很少,而这种“资源途径”被认为是地方福利国家对有孩子的家庭的影响的基础。哪些类型的公共投资对有子女家庭的总资源作出了特别贡献?考虑到各州在儿童方面的安全网支出存在巨大差异,以及联邦制的兴起(联邦制增加了各州在设计和管理社会项目方面的自主权),在州一级理解这个问题很重要。利用1997-2016年各州儿童支出数据集的年度数据,以及人口普查局《当前人口调查年度社会和经济补充》的数据,我们研究了各州转移支出与家庭收入来源之间的关系。研究结果表明,政府转移支付提高了最低收入和教育水平家庭的总收入,这些家庭之间的转移收入比高资源家庭之间的转移收入更具多维度。此外,利用州内和州间差异进行的分析表明,每个地区的州级支出与未受过大学教育的家庭和收入分配中处于后半部分的家庭相应的转移收入增加有关;在受过大学教育的家庭和收入分配最高的四分之一的家庭中,这种支出与转移收入的增加(或减少)无关。这些结果表明,州级支出的增加对资源最低的家庭的预算有不成比例的好处,可能是减少家庭之间资源差距的一种有希望的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Demography
Demography DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1964, the journal Demography has mirrored the vitality, diversity, high intellectual standard and wide impact of the field on which it reports. Demography presents the highest quality original research of scholars in a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, biology, economics, geography, history, psychology, public health, sociology, and statistics. The journal encompasses a wide variety of methodological approaches to population research. Its geographic focus is global, with articles addressing demographic matters from around the planet. Its temporal scope is broad, as represented by research that explores demographic phenomena spanning the ages from the past to the present, and reaching toward the future. Authors whose work is published in Demography benefit from the wide audience of population scientists their research will reach. Also in 2011 Demography remains the most cited journal among population studies and demographic periodicals. Published bimonthly, Demography is the flagship journal of the Population Association of America, reaching the membership of one of the largest professional demographic associations in the world.
期刊最新文献
Can Family Policies Enhance Fertility? An Ex Ante Evaluation Through Factorial Survey Experiments. Research Note: New Estimates of Immigrants' Self-employment From Linked Tax Records. Trends in the Developmental Gradient in Mothers' Parenting Time by Maternal Education, 2003-2019. Why Are So Many U.S. Mothers Becoming Their Family's Primary Economic Support? Maternal Wealth Implications of Child Incarceration: Examining the Upstream Consequences of Children's Incarceration for Women's Assets, Homeownership, and Home Equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1