Revisiting opioid toxicity: Cellular effects of six commonly used opioids.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0038
Erik Nylander, Frida Stam, Lenka Katila, Sofia Zelleroth, Jennifer Birgersson, Fred Nyberg, Mathias Hallberg, Alfhild Grönbladh
{"title":"Revisiting opioid toxicity: Cellular effects of six commonly used opioids.","authors":"Erik Nylander, Frida Stam, Lenka Katila, Sofia Zelleroth, Jennifer Birgersson, Fred Nyberg, Mathias Hallberg, Alfhild Grönbladh","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is an ongoing opioid crisis in the United States where the illicit and non-medical use of prescription opioids is associated with an increasing number of overdose deaths. Few studies have investigated opioid-induced effects on cell viability, and comparative studies are limited. Here, we examine the toxicity of six commonly used opioids: methadone, morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, and fentanyl with respect to mitochondrial and membrane function <i>in vitro</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The opioids were tested in four different cell cultures: primary cortical cell cultures, human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, and both differentiated and undifferentiated neuroblastoma/glioma hybrid NG108-15 cells. The mitochondrial activity was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the membrane integrity was assessed by measuring the leakage of lactate dehydrogenase. To compare the different opioids, the toxic dose (TD<sub>50</sub>) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results displayed a similar trend of opioid-reduced cell viability in all four cell cultures. The most toxic opioid was methadone, followed by fentanyl, while morphine was overall ranked as the least toxic opioid displaying little to no negative impact on cell viability. The remaining opioids varied in rank between the different cell types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study highlights opioid-dependent variations in toxicity across all four tested cell types, with methadone emerging as the most potent opioid.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There is an ongoing opioid crisis in the United States where the illicit and non-medical use of prescription opioids is associated with an increasing number of overdose deaths. Few studies have investigated opioid-induced effects on cell viability, and comparative studies are limited. Here, we examine the toxicity of six commonly used opioids: methadone, morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, and fentanyl with respect to mitochondrial and membrane function in vitro.

Methods: The opioids were tested in four different cell cultures: primary cortical cell cultures, human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, and both differentiated and undifferentiated neuroblastoma/glioma hybrid NG108-15 cells. The mitochondrial activity was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the membrane integrity was assessed by measuring the leakage of lactate dehydrogenase. To compare the different opioids, the toxic dose (TD50) was calculated.

Results: The results displayed a similar trend of opioid-reduced cell viability in all four cell cultures. The most toxic opioid was methadone, followed by fentanyl, while morphine was overall ranked as the least toxic opioid displaying little to no negative impact on cell viability. The remaining opioids varied in rank between the different cell types.

Conclusion: This in vitro study highlights opioid-dependent variations in toxicity across all four tested cell types, with methadone emerging as the most potent opioid.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重温阿片类药物毒性:六种常用阿片类药物的细胞效应。
目标:美国正在发生阿片类药物危机,处方阿片类药物的非法和非医疗使用与过量死亡人数的增加有关。很少有研究调查阿片类药物对细胞活力的影响,比较研究有限。在这里,我们研究了六种常用阿片类药物的毒性:美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮、氢吗啡酮、酮贝米酮和芬太尼在体外对线粒体和膜功能的影响。方法:在四种不同的细胞培养物中检测阿片类药物:原代皮质细胞培养物、人神经母细胞瘤SH-SY5Y细胞、分化和未分化的神经母细胞瘤/胶质瘤杂交NG108-15细胞。采用3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基溴化四唑(MTT)法测定线粒体活性,通过乳酸脱氢酶渗漏量测定膜完整性。比较不同阿片类药物的毒性剂量(TD50)。结果:在所有四种细胞培养中,结果显示阿片类药物降低细胞活力的趋势相似。毒性最大的阿片类药物是美沙酮,其次是芬太尼,而吗啡总体上被评为毒性最小的阿片类药物,对细胞活力几乎没有负面影响。剩余的阿片类药物在不同细胞类型之间的等级不同。结论:这项体外研究强调了阿片类药物在所有四种被测试细胞类型中毒性的依赖性变化,美沙酮是最有效的阿片类药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Stellate ganglion block in disparate treatment-resistant mental health disorders: A case series. A scoping review of the effectiveness of underwater treadmill exercise in clinical trials of chronic pain. Corrigendum to "Patient characteristics in relation to opioid exposure in a chronic non-cancer pain population". Association between clinical laboratory indicators and WOMAC scores in Qatar Biobank participants: The impact of testosterone and fibrinogen on pain, stiffness, and functional limitation. Effectiveness of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation vs heart rate variability biofeedback interventions for chronic pain conditions: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1