Standards for Quality Improvement Registries on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Delphi Consensus Report From VASCUNET and International Consortium of Vascular Registries.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.12.002
Matthew J Grima, Stefano Ancetti, Arun D Pherwani, Frederico B Gonçalves, Jacob Budtz-Lilly, Christian-Alexander Behrendt, Salvatore T Scali, Adam W Beck, Kevin Mani
{"title":"Standards for Quality Improvement Registries on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Delphi Consensus Report From VASCUNET and International Consortium of Vascular Registries.","authors":"Matthew J Grima, Stefano Ancetti, Arun D Pherwani, Frederico B Gonçalves, Jacob Budtz-Lilly, Christian-Alexander Behrendt, Salvatore T Scali, Adam W Beck, Kevin Mani","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Outcome registries in vascular surgery are increasingly used to drive quality improvement by vascular societies. The VASCUNET collaboration, within the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS), and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR) developed a set of variables for quality improvement registries on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair as a registry standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Representatives from international vascular registries within VASCUNET, ICVR, and other nations with established registries were invited to provide the variables. The final variables were developed through a two stage modified Delphi process. Variables from the established registries with at least 60% consensus among all the registries were included for round 1. A five point Likert scale (strongly disagree to fully agree) was used. If the limit of consensual agreement was not reached in round 1, the variable was discussed again in round 2. For round 2, an array question method (yes, no to unsure) was used. Agreement of at least 70% resulted in the variable being included in the final dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 out of 371 variables extracted from all AAA registries were circulated in the modified Delphi process as they reached the 60% consensus threshold. The questionnaire was circulated to 55 participants (round 1: 49; 89%; round 2: 43; 78%). After two rounds, 70 variables were recommended on consensual agreement. These variables comprised demographics (n = 4), pre-operative information (n = 28), intra-operative variables (n = 18), post-operative variables (n = 5), and follow up (n = 13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this modified Delphi process, an international panel of vascular surgeons representing quality improvement registries recommended 70 core variables as standard in registries on AAA repair. The inclusion of a core set of variables in AAA vascular registries may help to further harmonise observational research and quality of AAA repair among global healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.12.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Outcome registries in vascular surgery are increasingly used to drive quality improvement by vascular societies. The VASCUNET collaboration, within the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS), and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR) developed a set of variables for quality improvement registries on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair as a registry standard.

Methods: Representatives from international vascular registries within VASCUNET, ICVR, and other nations with established registries were invited to provide the variables. The final variables were developed through a two stage modified Delphi process. Variables from the established registries with at least 60% consensus among all the registries were included for round 1. A five point Likert scale (strongly disagree to fully agree) was used. If the limit of consensual agreement was not reached in round 1, the variable was discussed again in round 2. For round 2, an array question method (yes, no to unsure) was used. Agreement of at least 70% resulted in the variable being included in the final dataset.

Results: A total of 88 out of 371 variables extracted from all AAA registries were circulated in the modified Delphi process as they reached the 60% consensus threshold. The questionnaire was circulated to 55 participants (round 1: 49; 89%; round 2: 43; 78%). After two rounds, 70 variables were recommended on consensual agreement. These variables comprised demographics (n = 4), pre-operative information (n = 28), intra-operative variables (n = 18), post-operative variables (n = 5), and follow up (n = 13).

Conclusion: Based on this modified Delphi process, an international panel of vascular surgeons representing quality improvement registries recommended 70 core variables as standard in registries on AAA repair. The inclusion of a core set of variables in AAA vascular registries may help to further harmonise observational research and quality of AAA repair among global healthcare systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Trauma. Availability of Great Saphenous Vein for Infrainguinal Bypass. Open Surgery for Carotid Aneurysm: Age and Comorbidities Are Not Strict Contraindications. Recurrent Popliteal Vein Aneurysm. Elevated High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Prospective Population Based Study in The Norwegian HUNT Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1