Impact of cataract surgery on patients receiving intravitreal therapy for retinal vein occlusion

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/ceo.14468
Alessandro Invernizzi MD, Matteo Airaldi MD, Mariano Cozzi MSc, Vuong Nguyen PhD, Yohei Hashimoto PhD, Daniel Barthelmes MD, PhD, Louise O'Toole MD, Theodorus Leonardus Ponsioen MD, PhD, Pavol Kusenda MD, Francisco Javier Lavid MD, Nandor Jaross MD, Mark Gillies MD, PhD, Adrian Hunt MD, PhD
{"title":"Impact of cataract surgery on patients receiving intravitreal therapy for retinal vein occlusion","authors":"Alessandro Invernizzi MD,&nbsp;Matteo Airaldi MD,&nbsp;Mariano Cozzi MSc,&nbsp;Vuong Nguyen PhD,&nbsp;Yohei Hashimoto PhD,&nbsp;Daniel Barthelmes MD, PhD,&nbsp;Louise O'Toole MD,&nbsp;Theodorus Leonardus Ponsioen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Pavol Kusenda MD,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Lavid MD,&nbsp;Nandor Jaross MD,&nbsp;Mark Gillies MD, PhD,&nbsp;Adrian Hunt MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To assess clinical outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes treated with intravitreal injections for cystoid macular oedema (CMO) secondary to retinal vein occlusions (RVOs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eyes receiving intravitreal injections for CMO secondary to RVOs that underwent cataract extraction were identified from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry and matched 1:1 by 9 parameters with phakic controls also receiving intravitreal injections for the same condition. VA change at 12 months, central subfield thickness (CST) and injection frequency before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. The effect of baseline features on the final VA including age, CST, treatment frequency among others was tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 193 eyes that had cataract extraction (exposed) matched with 193 phakic eyes that did not have surgery (matched). VA (95%CI) changed by +9.9 (7, 12.8) letters in exposed eyes versus −2.4 (−4.1, −0.7) letters in matched eyes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The mean [SD] VA at 12 months was similar in exposed and matched eyes [60.7 (23.0) vs. 61.1 (24.3) letters, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.81]. The mean [SD] CST was similar between groups before and at surgery, but it was greater in exposed compared with matched eyes [353 (152) vs. 322 (123) μm, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.03] 12 months after surgery. Exposed eyes received more injections [median (range)] than matched eyes during the 12 months after surgery [5 (3, 7) vs. 4 (1, 6), injections, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Cataract extraction delivered good visual outcomes in patients treated for CMO secondary to RVOs. More injections were required on average in the 12 months after surgery in eyes undergoing surgery compared to matched controls.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"53 4","pages":"374-383"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.14468","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To assess clinical outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes treated with intravitreal injections for cystoid macular oedema (CMO) secondary to retinal vein occlusions (RVOs).

Methods

Eyes receiving intravitreal injections for CMO secondary to RVOs that underwent cataract extraction were identified from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry and matched 1:1 by 9 parameters with phakic controls also receiving intravitreal injections for the same condition. VA change at 12 months, central subfield thickness (CST) and injection frequency before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. The effect of baseline features on the final VA including age, CST, treatment frequency among others was tested.

Results

We included 193 eyes that had cataract extraction (exposed) matched with 193 phakic eyes that did not have surgery (matched). VA (95%CI) changed by +9.9 (7, 12.8) letters in exposed eyes versus −2.4 (−4.1, −0.7) letters in matched eyes (p < 0.01). The mean [SD] VA at 12 months was similar in exposed and matched eyes [60.7 (23.0) vs. 61.1 (24.3) letters, respectively, p = 0.81]. The mean [SD] CST was similar between groups before and at surgery, but it was greater in exposed compared with matched eyes [353 (152) vs. 322 (123) μm, respectively, p = 0.03] 12 months after surgery. Exposed eyes received more injections [median (range)] than matched eyes during the 12 months after surgery [5 (3, 7) vs. 4 (1, 6), injections, p < 0.01].

Conclusions

Cataract extraction delivered good visual outcomes in patients treated for CMO secondary to RVOs. More injections were required on average in the 12 months after surgery in eyes undergoing surgery compared to matched controls.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白内障手术对玻璃体内治疗视网膜静脉闭塞患者的影响。
背景:评价玻璃体内注射治疗继发于视网膜静脉阻塞(RVOs)的囊样黄斑水肿(CMO)的白内障手术的临床效果。方法:对行白内障摘除术的RVOs继发性CMO接受玻璃体内注射的眼进行鉴定。注册并按9个参数1:1匹配,同样接受玻璃体内注射的有晶状体对照。比较两组患者术后12个月VA变化、中心亚野厚度(CST)及注射次数。测试了基线特征对最终VA的影响,包括年龄、CST、治疗频率等。结果:我们纳入了193只白内障摘除(暴露)的眼睛和193只未手术的晶状眼(匹配)。暴露眼的VA (95%CI)变化为+9.9(7,12.8)个字母,而匹配眼的VA (95%CI)变化为-2.4(-4.1,-0.7)个字母(p)。结论:白内障摘除治疗继发于RVOs的CMO患者视力良好。与对照组相比,在手术后的12个月内,接受手术的眼睛平均需要更多的注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
期刊最新文献
Ray-Tracing-Based Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Combined Cataract Surgery and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Comparative Efficacy of Two Defocus Soft Contact Lenses on Axial Length and Choroid in High Myopic Adolescents: Comment. Lessons Learnt From 25 Years of Endophthalmitis: Causes, Microbiology and Visual Outcome Trends. Aqueous Humour Outflow Assessment Using Imaging-Based Techniques in Angle-Based Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS): A Systematic Review. Interpreting Hyperreflective Foci in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Critical Review of Cell Origins, Evolving Terminology and Clinical Utility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1