Treatment at an Academic Medical Center Eliminates Survival Disparities for Appalachian Kentuckians with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Journal of Appalachian health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.13023/jah.0601.02
Emily Cassim, Hannah McDonald, Megan Harper, Quan Chen, Miranda Lin, Reema Patel, Michael Cavnar, Prakash Pandalai, Bin Huang, Pamela C Hull, Joseph Kim, Erin Burke
{"title":"Treatment at an Academic Medical Center Eliminates Survival Disparities for Appalachian Kentuckians with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Emily Cassim, Hannah McDonald, Megan Harper, Quan Chen, Miranda Lin, Reema Patel, Michael Cavnar, Prakash Pandalai, Bin Huang, Pamela C Hull, Joseph Kim, Erin Burke","doi":"10.13023/jah.0601.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rates of cancer mortality in Appalachian Kentucky is among the highest in the nation. It is unknown whether geographic location of treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), one of the deadliest cancers worldwide, influences survival in Appalachian Kentuckians.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares outcomes among Appalachian Kentuckians with PDAC who received treatment at an academic medical center (AMC) or community facility (CF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Kentucky Cancer Registry, patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2003 and 2018 were identified. Patients were categorized according to treatment location (AMC v. CF) and county of residence (Appalachian v. non-Appalachian). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to assess survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, out of 4,402 PDAC patients, 87.3% received treatment at CFs and 12.7% at an AMC. When stratified by treatment location and Appalachian status, significant differences were found in clinicopathologic factors, such as age, smoking, insurance status, stage, and treatment (<i>p</i> < .05). Factors significantly associated with decreased survival included treatment at a CF (HR 1.53 for Appalachian, 1.25 for Non-Appalachian), patient age > 75 years (HR 1.44), having Medicare/Medicaid insurance (HR 1.23/1.16), and history of smoking (HR 1.11). Decreased 1- and 5-year survival was associated with treatment at a CF for both Appalachian (27.4% and 3.6%) and Non-Appalachian (36% and 5.7%) patients (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Improved survival of Kentuckians treated at an AMC suggests that poorer PDAC outcomes in Appalachian patients may be related to access to tertiary care. Future research should examine potential reasons for these disparate outcomes and strategies for increasing the quality of cancer care at CFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"6 1-2","pages":"6-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0601.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rates of cancer mortality in Appalachian Kentucky is among the highest in the nation. It is unknown whether geographic location of treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), one of the deadliest cancers worldwide, influences survival in Appalachian Kentuckians.

Purpose: This study compares outcomes among Appalachian Kentuckians with PDAC who received treatment at an academic medical center (AMC) or community facility (CF).

Methods: Using the Kentucky Cancer Registry, patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2003 and 2018 were identified. Patients were categorized according to treatment location (AMC v. CF) and county of residence (Appalachian v. non-Appalachian). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to assess survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

Results: Overall, out of 4,402 PDAC patients, 87.3% received treatment at CFs and 12.7% at an AMC. When stratified by treatment location and Appalachian status, significant differences were found in clinicopathologic factors, such as age, smoking, insurance status, stage, and treatment (p < .05). Factors significantly associated with decreased survival included treatment at a CF (HR 1.53 for Appalachian, 1.25 for Non-Appalachian), patient age > 75 years (HR 1.44), having Medicare/Medicaid insurance (HR 1.23/1.16), and history of smoking (HR 1.11). Decreased 1- and 5-year survival was associated with treatment at a CF for both Appalachian (27.4% and 3.6%) and Non-Appalachian (36% and 5.7%) patients (p < .001).

Implications: Improved survival of Kentuckians treated at an AMC suggests that poorer PDAC outcomes in Appalachian patients may be related to access to tertiary care. Future research should examine potential reasons for these disparate outcomes and strategies for increasing the quality of cancer care at CFs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Chronic Pain Among Adults Diagnosed with Diabetes Residing in Rural Appalachia. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intimate Partner Violence and Child Maltreatment Services in Rural Northwest North Carolina. Nutrition Education Needs and Barriers of Uninsured Clients who Utilize Free Clinics in Western North Carolina. Aftermath: A Word to Appalachia Following Hurricane Helene. Psychosocial Factors, Stress and Sleep Among Rural Appalachian Kentucky Residents with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1